Dovercourt lighthouse II

by WaypointCharlie

For those who don't like long exposure milky seas, here's another shot I took of the lighthouse about 25 mins earlier, when the tide was a bit lower and the sky was more boring. Personally I'm not a great fan of milky seas either (they're a bit of a cliche) but in this case I hate to say I prefer that version. What do you think?

Link to milky sea version
Liked by  pauljay pwegbr
Uploaded23/10/2015 - 08:28
CategoryLandscape / Travel
Shutter Speed1/30
Aperturef/14
LensN/A
ISO80
Focal Length39mm
Unique Views / Likes23/2
TagsN/A

bwlchmawr
Posted 23/10/2015 - 12:08 Link
No, this one's much better. That's what sea actually looks like, after all.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
WaypointCharlie
Posted 23/10/2015 - 12:29 Link
bwlchmawr wrote:
No, this one's much better. That's what sea actually looks like, after all.
But do photographs have to be like we normally perceive the world? I think some of the most interesting photos are those that show us the world in a different way to that we're used to. (Could open a big debate here)
bwlchmawr
Posted 23/10/2015 - 17:54 Link
WaypointCharlie wrote:
bwlchmawr wrote:
No, this one's much better. That's what sea actually looks like, after all.
But do photographs have to be like we normally perceive the world? I think some of the most interesting photos are those that show us the world in a different way to that we're used to. (Could open a big debate here)
That's a really good point. I mean, I like very shallow depth of field and monochrome and they're not "natural" as such. Maybe it's just me. I hate blatantly obvious HDR as well...
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Stridey
Posted 23/10/2015 - 18:27 Link
This one for. The presence of the small wave and the shingle makes for a more interesting foreground IMO. Sure, long exposure filters have their place but I feel just not best suited to this composition. Each to their own though - that's what makes photography so exciting !
PeterKR
Posted 23/10/2015 - 19:59 Link
WaypointCharlie wrote:
bwlchmawr wrote:
No, this one's much better. That's what sea actually looks like, after all.
But do photographs have to be like we normally perceive the world? I think some of the most interesting photos are those that show us the world in a different way to that we're used to. (Could open a big debate here)
I like this and agree with Andrew.
However, my wife and I are always having this discussion about whether it should be a true record or an artistic impression !
(As you say the debate could go on .......)

Best regards
Peter
alfpics
Posted 23/10/2015 - 21:25 Link
I like both types of water. I think on balance this version is better IMO
Andy
Dorset_Mike
Posted 24/10/2015 - 22:37 Link
I agree with you, the long exposure gave the image a serene character that makes it stand out.

Mike
Regards,
Mike

Every day's a holiday!

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo