Zeiss V SMC Takumar
Posted 22/07/2014 - 22:01
Link
I'll stick with my Taks then...
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 23/07/2014 - 00:14
Link
Hi Peter,
what mount was the Zeiss? Also, what focal distance did you do the tests at? No reason in particular for asking, just interested!
what mount was the Zeiss? Also, what focal distance did you do the tests at? No reason in particular for asking, just interested!
Posted 23/07/2014 - 10:11
Link
The mountis the Contax/Yashica bayonet -- I did test at full aperture on a bus at 30 feet and a 'candid' at around 10 feet away and a flower stopped down to f8 at 3 feet away which I had already taken with Pentax.
Been a member of Pentax Club since the Ron Spillman era! Got COMPUTERISED at last - DIGITISED?
Taken the PLUNGE - BUT FILM STILL RULES !!!
Taken the PLUNGE - BUT FILM STILL RULES !!!
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
930 posts
21 years
Brentwood Essex (UK)
Well, I tried the 50mm f1.4 Zeiss Planar at f1.4 and under a x6 Magnifier I cannot see any difference from my earlier 1973 50mm f1.4 SMC Takumar on my Spotmatic F ---
Taken the PLUNGE - BUT FILM STILL RULES !!!