Yanks coming
Posted 21/03/2010 - 08:13
Link
I believe this is a 'Grumman F4 Wildcat' Flew mainly from carriers.
Great shot.
Paul
Great shot.
Paul
K5's (2)both gripped, K10d gripped, Pentax 28-90 f3.5, Sigma 18-250mm, Sigma 150-500mm. Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro, Sigma 10-20 f.4-5.6.EX DC, Hoya 135 f2.8, Take on 28mm f2.8 Pentax AF360 flash, 2 fill in slaves. 30 metre remote release, Rt angle viewfinder, Giotto NOT 3261B Tripod with Manfrotto 808Rd4 ball head, Manfroto 4861RC2 monopoly, shoulder stock, various filters etc, Panasonic SET HBS HD Video cam, Tamrac Explorer 8x backpack and a sore back.....
-------------------------------------------------------
Photography is an index for measuring futility and pride.......
Paul
:wink
http://s743.photobucket.com/home/pg20_photos/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pg20
-------------------------------------------------------
Photography is an index for measuring futility and pride.......
Paul
:wink
http://s743.photobucket.com/home/pg20_photos/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pg20
Posted 21/03/2010 - 11:35
Link
And the second shot is a toyota but I cant tell which model
Actually, they do look a little soft, there are any number of reason for the aircraft but assuming the car was stationary very few reasons for that.
I'd get the camera on a tripod and do some tests, try auto focus and then try it manually, the car badge should be a good subject for this, compare the results agianst other lenses too.
Actually, they do look a little soft, there are any number of reason for the aircraft but assuming the car was stationary very few reasons for that.
I'd get the camera on a tripod and do some tests, try auto focus and then try it manually, the car badge should be a good subject for this, compare the results agianst other lenses too.
Posted 21/03/2010 - 12:04
Link
Thank you for that information paul glad you like it,as for the lens I forgot to say it had a 2x on it, I have been told it might jam on the K7 so I put the 2x on just in case,
Yes the Toyota was stationary cheaper to run and get a better shot that way ,
Tried about five shots on it and that was the best, when looking through the lens slightly out of focus it looks spotty (very fine spots not dust it is regularly spaced)
thank you for the reply
Yes the Toyota was stationary cheaper to run and get a better shot that way ,
Tried about five shots on it and that was the best, when looking through the lens slightly out of focus it looks spotty (very fine spots not dust it is regularly spaced)
thank you for the reply
K5iis,K7,KM, MG, Super A, MZ50.
24f2.8; 28f2.8;31 limited; 35f2; 55f1.8; 135f2.8; 400f5.6:
Some zooms
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/jack" target="_blank">
http://c759846.r46.cf2.rackcdn.com/img/black_link.jpg" alt="See my photos featured in the PENTAX Photogallery" />
24f2.8; 28f2.8;31 limited; 35f2; 55f1.8; 135f2.8; 400f5.6:
Some zooms
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/jack" target="_blank">
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
221 posts
16 years
adelaide
This lens looks a bit soft to me what is you oppinion.thanking you
[IMG]http://i858.photobucket.com/albums/ab142/montyaus/birds/yankplanenav.jpg[/IMG]
This is her car.
[IMG]http://i858.photobucket.com/albums/ab142/montyaus/birds/toyota.jpg[/IMG]
24f2.8; 28f2.8;31 limited; 35f2; 55f1.8; 135f2.8; 400f5.6:
Some zooms
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/jack" target="_blank">