Wild Goats

bychan
Posted 16/06/2010 - 00:25 Link
A few weeks ago I posted an image in the gallery of a wild goat, which are a fairly common site in and around the village.

The following are links to a few more taken that evening.

All shot with the DA 55-300.

link

link

link

link

Regards
Adrian
K5IIs, Sigma 10-20, Pentax DA 16-85, Pentax DA 55-300, Pentax 70 Ltd, Metz 44 AF-2.
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ambott/
snappychappy
Posted 16/06/2010 - 07:23 Link
I like the first and second images best, great depth of field and a lovely background.
mikew
Posted 16/06/2010 - 07:49 Link
I agree about the DOF but are any of them sharp enough? If the originals are no better I would sigh, work out why they weren't sharp (camera shake perhaps) and bin them I'm afraid. With a very heavy heart though as they use DOF and colour well.

Mike
---------------------------------------------------

You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
RR
Posted 16/06/2010 - 11:57 Link
I'd have to agree about the camera shake Adrian. Looking at the exif you're shooting at 300mm at around 1/50 of a second. I know you have SR to help but it doesn't work miracles. You'd have been better pushing the iso up a little more, I'd rather have sharp but noisier images to work with.

At 300mm I'd practice your handholding technique & try and stick to 1/200 & faster even with SR on.
mikew
Posted 16/06/2010 - 12:21 Link
I didn't realise it was 1/50th - I'd try using a cheap monopod and see how you get on but as RR says 1/200th or better is best.
---------------------------------------------------

You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
terje-l
Posted 16/06/2010 - 15:02 Link
Some characters you have encountered, Adrian. The otherwise nice portraits lack sharpness, though.

I second Mike's idea of using a Monopod.
Best regards
Terry

K20D, Optio I10, DA 18-55 1:3.5-5.6 AL II, A 1:1.7/50, D FA 1:2.8/100 Macro, Sigma 70-300 1:4-5.6 APO DG Macro, Pentax AF 360FGZ
bwlchmawr
Posted 16/06/2010 - 19:41 Link
I think Mike's right. It's a shame as the contrast is so good, as is colour and you've framed them so nicely. The camera seemes to have "locked on" all right so it must be camera shake. Must be worth another go, though.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
bychan
Posted 16/06/2010 - 21:57 Link
First of all many thanks for the comments and excellent advice, greatly appreciated.

Excuse the pun, but I do have a soft spot for these creatures and this set On the evening increasing the ISO would have been the best course, I presume, and with the Kx great results should still be had.

One of my main problems with shooting these was the location, and my lack of height (all of 5"4 ).

I was stood in a steep-ish field, with the goats higher-up to my right. Separating us was a stone wall about a foot deep. The closer I crawled up then the higher the wall became, so add to the equation being vertically challenged, stretching slightly and zooming at 300m.

In a funny way the stone wall was both my ally and hindrance; without it I would never have got that close without scaring them away.

Unfortunately under these circumstances any type of support wouldn't have been of aid (an orange box to stand on, perhaps ).

I think the image added to the gallery was one of the better ones
link

Again thanks for all your advice.

Regards
Adrian
K5IIs, Sigma 10-20, Pentax DA 16-85, Pentax DA 55-300, Pentax 70 Ltd, Metz 44 AF-2.
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ambott/

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo