which is better
Posted 09/06/2009 - 21:39
Link
Personally I like the second one as it's level with the squiggels eye line.
I like shots like this.
Plus it looks like a meercat, watching out
Blimey Scott, they are both spot on exposure and focus wise
Perfect in fact
Paul
I like shots like this.
Plus it looks like a meercat, watching out
Blimey Scott, they are both spot on exposure and focus wise
Perfect in fact
Paul
Posted 09/06/2009 - 22:02
Link
The second for me as well. When photographing these guys I like to get down to their level.
I m my local park, they are very tame and I like to get as close as possible, although sometimes they get too close...

(Just in case ur wondering this was taken with my Panasonic fz7 on wide angle, not my 150-500mm! And yes the nose is touching the lens!)
I m my local park, they are very tame and I like to get as close as possible, although sometimes they get too close...

(Just in case ur wondering this was taken with my Panasonic fz7 on wide angle, not my 150-500mm! And yes the nose is touching the lens!)
Posted 09/06/2009 - 22:14
Link
Quote:
Blimey Scott, they are both spot on exposure and focus wise
I must make a public apology to anyone who's images I have said were soft, I just read the above and thought "you must be kidding niether is sharp"Blimey Scott, they are both spot on exposure and focus wise
Makes mental note to wear reading glasses when in front of the monitor
Quote:
And yes the nose is touching the lens
good job it wasn't a Pentax lens, I hear the SMC is prone to corrosion from Squirrel snotAnd yes the nose is touching the lens
Both are nice Scott but I'll go with the others and say the second has the edge.
Posted 09/06/2009 - 22:59
Link
In my opinion, neither excites nor interests me.
https://pentaxphotogallery.com" target="_blank">
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/images/black_link_small.jpg" alt="See my photos featured in the PENTAX Photogallery" />
Posted 09/06/2009 - 23:19
Link
Karl wrote:
In my opinion, neither excites nor interests me.
why look then or comment karl, and i see noise does please you and it doesn't me, so thanks for you comment buddy
In my opinion, neither excites nor interests me.
just keep snapping,
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
Posted 09/06/2009 - 23:48
Link
First one not interesting (did you PP it, it looks a bit oversharpened (and blurry) to me, but it may be just a wrong impression), second one not bad, nice pose, nice background/DOF behind the little beast (IMHO) .
Posted 09/06/2009 - 23:49
Link
i likes the second one better, the vibrant green behind is just lovely - really well focused in the front and overall a pleasing photo - well done mate Keep up the good work xx
Dont complain about the darkness, Light a candle......
Posted 10/06/2009 - 00:33
Link
Karl wrote:
In my opinion, neither excites nor interests me.
Karl, you are entitled to your opionion but constructive criticism would be appreciative on these types of forum.In my opinion, neither excites nor interests me.
Tell Scott why you dislike them as I am sure he will apprieciate it more
Paul
Posted 10/06/2009 - 07:59
Link
Would have been pleased to have taken either but I too will go with the second although I think the main subject is a bit sharper in the first.
In the second I would have preferred the sharpest area to be the head but it is only just off and the rest of the shot is great. Perhaps selecting the eye and sharpening that alone would be a tweak worth trying.
I am in no way particularly knowledgeable in technical matters so please ignore me if you think my comments are nonsense
In the second I would have preferred the sharpest area to be the head but it is only just off and the rest of the shot is great. Perhaps selecting the eye and sharpening that alone would be a tweak worth trying.
I am in no way particularly knowledgeable in technical matters so please ignore me if you think my comments are nonsense
Jackie H
K7, K20D, istDS, Optio SV, ME
Most used glass
50mm f1.4, 60-250mm, 28-80mm,
Sigma 105mm 2.8 Macro & Bertha 50-500
K7, K20D, istDS, Optio SV, ME
Most used glass
50mm f1.4, 60-250mm, 28-80mm,
Sigma 105mm 2.8 Macro & Bertha 50-500
Posted 10/06/2009 - 09:31
Link
Second one for me too. Althogh the first is technically sharper, the second one wins hands down. not only is the expression on Mr Squirrel's face wonderful, but more importantly the DOF has isolated him against the background, always a winner with nature shots of this type.
Peter
My Flickr page
My Flickr page
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1053 posts
18 years
devon (honiton)
[IMG]http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/IMGP1313.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/SJB10827.jpg[/IMG]
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson
http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/
CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.