Which Conversion?
Posted 01/04/2013 - 21:10
Link
No 1 for me Andrew, nicer crop and better detail. No 2 foreground detail to distracting.
Jim
Jim
Posted 01/04/2013 - 21:18
Link
Number 1 for me too. Looks smoother and draws more attention to the subject.
Posted 01/04/2013 - 22:29
Link
I think the conversion of #2 might look good with image #1. At least as far as the building and sky are concerned. The ground looks better in #1.
Something about the image#2 that seems to lack detail. Dunno if its the conversion, that is it different focal length, or just soft but I don't know if I'd say our of focus. Just that #1 is better to begin with.
Something about the image#2 that seems to lack detail. Dunno if its the conversion, that is it different focal length, or just soft but I don't know if I'd say our of focus. Just that #1 is better to begin with.
Posted 01/04/2013 - 22:39
Link
No2 for me, it seems to lead the eye in more than No1
One day you'll find, 10yrs have got behind you.
Posted 01/04/2013 - 22:47
Link
amoringello wrote:
I think the conversion of #2 might look good with image #1. At least as far as the building and sky are concerned. The ground looks better in #1.
Something about the image#2 that seems to lack detail. Dunno if its the conversion, that is it different focal length, or just soft but I don't know if I'd say our of focus. Just that #1 is better to begin with.
Looking at it again you are right, I hadn't noticed that No: 2 looks far less sharp!
I think the conversion of #2 might look good with image #1. At least as far as the building and sky are concerned. The ground looks better in #1.
Something about the image#2 that seems to lack detail. Dunno if its the conversion, that is it different focal length, or just soft but I don't know if I'd say our of focus. Just that #1 is better to begin with.
Posted 01/04/2013 - 23:36
Link
No.1 for sure.
Darken the path a bit (like to the shadow area), and lose the shadows on the grass.
Geoff
Darken the path a bit (like to the shadow area), and lose the shadows on the grass.
Geoff
Water can wear away a stone - but it can't cook lunch
X-5
istDS
K2000
P50.
Lenses Digital: 50-200, 18-55 KAF: 28-80.
Lenses KA & K: SMC-KA f2.0, SMC-K f1.4, SMC-K f1.7 Tokina KA 28-70 , SMC Pentax 70-210 F4, Sigma KA 75-300 , Hanimex 500mm Mirror, and the Tamron Adaptall-2 stuff.
and then there's all the M42 kit, and the accessories ...
X-5
istDS
K2000
P50.
Lenses Digital: 50-200, 18-55 KAF: 28-80.
Lenses KA & K: SMC-KA f2.0, SMC-K f1.4, SMC-K f1.7 Tokina KA 28-70 , SMC Pentax 70-210 F4, Sigma KA 75-300 , Hanimex 500mm Mirror, and the Tamron Adaptall-2 stuff.
and then there's all the M42 kit, and the accessories ...
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
2943 posts
15 years
Chesterfield
I am not sure which one I prefer??
1.
2.
Grateful for any thoughts, thanks
"I'm here because the whiskey is free" - Tyla
PPG link
Flickr link