waterproof case for Kx?
Posted 18/04/2012 - 23:36
Link
Try Ned Bunnell's blog, I think he listed something last year.
Best regards, John
Posted 19/04/2012 - 09:24
Link
I think you'll find the cases veerrry expensive, and quite big. A friend of mine looked at them a year or so ago and settled on an Olympus or a Canon (can't remember) compact which was waterproof to several meters and much cheaper than the perspex box.
regards
Bernard
regards
Bernard
Posted 19/04/2012 - 09:26
Link
I notice the OP has a W80 already, so the WG-2 would be a logical upgrade for that.
How deep do you need to go?
How deep do you need to go?
Best regards, John
Posted 19/04/2012 - 10:12
Link
Aquapac do a generic waterproof case for DSLRs. Still 95 quid or so though.
It is suitable for submersion up to 5 metres deep for 30 minutes.
You can e-mail them to check if it will fit the Kx but I am pretty sure it will.
Edit: the one Ned Bunnel refers to is only for the K-7/K-5 :
http://www.ikelite.com/web_two/pen_k5.html
It is suitable for submersion up to 5 metres deep for 30 minutes.
You can e-mail them to check if it will fit the Kx but I am pretty sure it will.
Edit: the one Ned Bunnel refers to is only for the K-7/K-5 :
http://www.ikelite.com/web_two/pen_k5.html
Posted 19/04/2012 - 10:38
Link
johnriley wrote:
I notice the OP has a W80 already, so the WG-2 would be a logical upgrade for that.
How deep do you need to go?
So it does beg the question what will the Kx acheive under 5m of water that the W80 cannotI notice the OP has a W80 already, so the WG-2 would be a logical upgrade for that.
How deep do you need to go?
Quote:
the one Ned Bunnel refers to is only for the K-7/K-5 :
http://www.ikelite.com/web_two/pen_k5.html
I think that was the one my friend looked at, but as I recall the price was £5-600.the one Ned Bunnel refers to is only for the K-7/K-5 :
http://www.ikelite.com/web_two/pen_k5.html
Just a thought:-
A cheap plastic clamp type lunch box and duct tape to add additional sealing, then fire the camera with a IR remote (in a sealed bag)
Second thoughts - ballast?; pressure @ 5m?; is it worth it?
Bernard
Posted 25/04/2012 - 18:50
Link
Sorry for late reply - the w80 is pretty bad, it's fun but I wouldn't print any of the shots - it's for surfing so don't need to go under 2m
Will check your links
Will check your links
Digital: KP, Film: KX, ME Super
Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6, Tamron 17-50mm f2.8, Pentax 16-85mm, Pentax DA 20-40 ltd
Pentax 21mm f3.2 ltd, Sigma 24mm f2.8 macro, Pentax 28mm f2.8, Pentax 35mm f2.8 macro, Pentax 43mm f1.9 LTD, Pentax 50mm FA f1.7, Pentax A 50mm f1.7, Pentax K 55mm f1.8, Pentax DA* 55mm f1.4
Metz 36 AF-4
Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6, Tamron 17-50mm f2.8, Pentax 16-85mm, Pentax DA 20-40 ltd
Pentax 21mm f3.2 ltd, Sigma 24mm f2.8 macro, Pentax 28mm f2.8, Pentax 35mm f2.8 macro, Pentax 43mm f1.9 LTD, Pentax 50mm FA f1.7, Pentax A 50mm f1.7, Pentax K 55mm f1.8, Pentax DA* 55mm f1.4
Metz 36 AF-4
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


567 posts
16 years
Berlin
it's too go underwater so needs a really waterproof not weather resistant or so..
thx
Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6, Tamron 17-50mm f2.8, Pentax 16-85mm, Pentax DA 20-40 ltd
Pentax 21mm f3.2 ltd, Sigma 24mm f2.8 macro, Pentax 28mm f2.8, Pentax 35mm f2.8 macro, Pentax 43mm f1.9 LTD, Pentax 50mm FA f1.7, Pentax A 50mm f1.7, Pentax K 55mm f1.8, Pentax DA* 55mm f1.4
Metz 36 AF-4