Waterfall
Posted 29/07/2009 - 14:10
Link
My first impressions are that it's a lovely shot, but I agree, it might be a little busy. Once the eye's followed the waterfall down, it starts hunting around, and there's a lot of textures to take in.
I'd consider a crop to show only the upper left 'third' or so. So, cut from the right about where the rocks meets the horizon, and from about 2/3rds down, if that makes sense.
If it doesn't, I could give it a go tonight when I get home to show you what I mean.
Havign said that, it is a really interesting shot, and looks like a fantastic location!
I'd consider a crop to show only the upper left 'third' or so. So, cut from the right about where the rocks meets the horizon, and from about 2/3rds down, if that makes sense.
If it doesn't, I could give it a go tonight when I get home to show you what I mean.
Havign said that, it is a really interesting shot, and looks like a fantastic location!
Pentax K10d; Metz mecablitz 48 AF-1; Pentax A 50mm F2; Pentax 18-55mm DAII; Sigma 28-300mm F3.5-5.6; Koboron 24-70mm F3.5-4.8. Pentax MZ-7, Zenit 35mm
My Flickr Photos
My Flickr Photos
Posted 29/07/2009 - 15:02
Link
Were you trying to show the difference between the static ice and moving water? I think the water is too thin and wispy against the very strong outline of the rocks and ice. Maybe to me it does not give the impression of a cascade.
Barrie - Too Old To Die Young
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Posted 29/07/2009 - 15:27
Link
I think it's nice shot Steve with good overall tones.But slightly lacking compositionally.I think if it were just the waterfall without the sky it would be a lot better.
Posted 29/07/2009 - 15:47
Link
I agree with sanderscapes, I keep finding that the sky and right hand side keeps drawing my attention away.
Pentax K20D, Pentax 16-45, Sigma 50-300, Tamron 70-200 f2.8. Tamron 90 f2.8 macro, The Sigma Bigma.
Nikon D700 ,nikon 14-24mm f2.8, Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR.
Nikon D700 ,nikon 14-24mm f2.8, Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR.
Posted 29/07/2009 - 16:28
Link
This was my first waterfall shot. I was attempting to slow it down enough to blur the water, something I had never tried before. I found getting an exposure slow enough to blur the water but retaining detail in the ice crystals in the foreground fairly tricky at first, it took a CP filter plus a .9 a .6 and a .3 ND filter stacked to get it slow enough.
I think bforbes is correct in his point,perhaps it would look better with the water frozen instead of blurred and would suit the ice better.
And yes the sky is distracting I agree. So, either a wider shot, more of a landscape or a close in shot may have been better.
The location is on the path up to the Glyders in Snowdonia, I was not alone so did not have the time i would have liked to compose (experiment) with this shot.
Thanks for the constructive input, so much better than polite compliments and much appreciated.
One for the 'not quite there' folder then
I think bforbes is correct in his point,perhaps it would look better with the water frozen instead of blurred and would suit the ice better.
And yes the sky is distracting I agree. So, either a wider shot, more of a landscape or a close in shot may have been better.
The location is on the path up to the Glyders in Snowdonia, I was not alone so did not have the time i would have liked to compose (experiment) with this shot.
Thanks for the constructive input, so much better than polite compliments and much appreciated.
One for the 'not quite there' folder then
Posted 29/07/2009 - 16:33
Link
Road Dancer
I tried the crop and its certainly an improvement, but still not quite there i think
MikeW
Tried the rotating and it helps but I a going to forget this one i think.
Off to sunny climes (Spain) tomorrow so hopefully I'll have a few pics when I get back, (no ice hopefully unless its in my drink).
I tried the crop and its certainly an improvement, but still not quite there i think
MikeW
Tried the rotating and it helps but I a going to forget this one i think.
Off to sunny climes (Spain) tomorrow so hopefully I'll have a few pics when I get back, (no ice hopefully unless its in my drink).
Posted 29/07/2009 - 18:12
Link
Steve it took my breath away at first glance.But hey, you don't need to forget it,unless you planning to take another picture of this beautiful scene!
Posted 29/07/2009 - 21:36
Link
[IMG]http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u196/road_dancer/waterfall-contrast.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u196/road_dancer/waterfall-contrast-crop.jpg[/IMG]
Hope you don't mind, but I took the liberty of trying a couple of things.
A contrast boost seems to help define the picture better, at the expense of a few droplets, and the 2nd image is rotated a tad and, obviously cropped. Whether you think they're improvements or not, hopefully gives you some ideas perhaps?
[IMG]http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u196/road_dancer/waterfall-contrast-crop.jpg[/IMG]
Hope you don't mind, but I took the liberty of trying a couple of things.
A contrast boost seems to help define the picture better, at the expense of a few droplets, and the 2nd image is rotated a tad and, obviously cropped. Whether you think they're improvements or not, hopefully gives you some ideas perhaps?
Pentax K10d; Metz mecablitz 48 AF-1; Pentax A 50mm F2; Pentax 18-55mm DAII; Sigma 28-300mm F3.5-5.6; Koboron 24-70mm F3.5-4.8. Pentax MZ-7, Zenit 35mm
My Flickr Photos
My Flickr Photos
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


378 posts
17 years
Derbyshire / Offshore
Honest thoughts welcome.
[IMG]http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f396/Hannabella/waterfall.jpg[/IMG]
DA 12-24 | DA* 16-50 | DA* 50-135 | Sigma 100-300 F4
Lightroom 2, CS3
My FlickR