Walk along the canal.
Posted 07/05/2013 - 19:05
Link
Those could be almost any canal in England - outside of a town.
I have recently been working with Meta-Data for various media formats and am interested to see how the tool copes with various images.
I tried to read the EXIF data from the first image and it was blank - so I changed to PhotoMe and again blank. The second image has a restricted set of data. Was it deliberate to remove it from the first? In the first it does not even include your name as copyright owner/photographer although it is there in the second. Or was it removed on upload?
I have recently been working with Meta-Data for various media formats and am interested to see how the tool copes with various images.
I tried to read the EXIF data from the first image and it was blank - so I changed to PhotoMe and again blank. The second image has a restricted set of data. Was it deliberate to remove it from the first? In the first it does not even include your name as copyright owner/photographer although it is there in the second. Or was it removed on upload?
Posted 07/05/2013 - 19:17
Link
I think the forum software removes the data
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Posted 07/05/2013 - 19:25
Link
Both very nice Dave, the kit lens has done a good job here. I would reduce the yellow saturation a little bit, particularly on the first one, so that the greens are a little more natural.
Regards
David
Regards
David
Posted 07/05/2013 - 19:41
Link
gartmore wrote:
I think the forum software removes the data
If that is true, then why one and not the other? And certainly not consistently ...
I think the forum software removes the data
Posted 07/05/2013 - 19:52
Link
It depends on the file size. If that gets too big, then the EXIF is stripped out.
Best regards, John
Posted 07/05/2013 - 19:59
Link
johnriley wrote:
It depends on the file size. If that gets too big, then the EXIF is stripped out.
The first (without EXIF) is 252kB and the second 792kB - EXIF does not take up that much.
It depends on the file size. If that gets too big, then the EXIF is stripped out.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
1174 posts
15 years
Bradford
Digital:
Pentax K5- Vivitar 19mm 3.8; FA35mm f2; D-Xenon 100mm macro f2.8; DA50-200mm WR...
Flash:
Yongnuo YN-560; Vivitar 285HV; Cactus V4 triggers...
Film:
Pentax-MX & M50mm f1.4; Spottie & 55mm f1.8; MG & M40mm 2.8...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/daveholmesphotos/