Venice II
Posted 29/11/2009 - 18:47
Link
wont attempt to do a C&C - but that second one really appeals to me - the different textures of the stone and the old bricks and then the paving stones - that is stunning
let the education continue
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
Posted 29/11/2009 - 18:55
Link
With the first and last one the effect is certainly working but with the middle two the image lacks contrast I think the non toned map and lowered contrast version works better.
Certainly the second one is very nice besides the effect, very nicely composed.
Certainly the second one is very nice besides the effect, very nicely composed.
Posted 29/11/2009 - 18:57
Link
No two for me as well, I really like all the different textures of the brick work.
Posted 29/11/2009 - 19:14
Link
Thanks guys!
Here's #2 in another version, here I used only the shadow/highlight function of PS to balance the pic:
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_PRI7362fca.jpg[/IMG]
So as you can see the first version does try to increase the local contrasts.
Prieni
Here's #2 in another version, here I used only the shadow/highlight function of PS to balance the pic:
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_PRI7362fca.jpg[/IMG]
So as you can see the first version does try to increase the local contrasts.
Prieni
How inappropriate to call this planet earth when it is quite clearly Ocean. - Arthur C. Clarke
Prieni's PPG page
Prieni's PPG page
Posted 29/11/2009 - 19:21
Link
Great pictures but I like No. 2 most and I think the sea shell shot is stunning. I prefer your first posting of No. 2 to the later version.
David
David
Posted 29/11/2009 - 19:30
Link
Interesting Prieni.
Most of the time the HDR pulls the Contrast down a lot.
I like the floor and ceiling of the second version and the walls of the HDR one... I can't decide now
ps. Prieni do you mind if I've a go with your photo?
Most of the time the HDR pulls the Contrast down a lot.
I like the floor and ceiling of the second version and the walls of the HDR one... I can't decide now
ps. Prieni do you mind if I've a go with your photo?
Posted 30/11/2009 - 00:14
Link
They are all fantastic. I like them all!
One thing I find with these type of detail shots that it is really worthwhile to click through and see the full size version, the forum software's resize function is a bit lacking in some cases.
One thing I find with these type of detail shots that it is really worthwhile to click through and see the full size version, the forum software's resize function is a bit lacking in some cases.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 30/11/2009 - 00:17
Link
Yes lovely shots, Jack
Posted 30/11/2009 - 07:32
Link
Thanks again!
David: Yes, I also like how the sea shell shot turned out. Part of the appeal, I think, is that it is a fisheye shot. But the PP also pulls out a lot of detail in the individual shells.
Stefan: As far as I can see HDR/tonemapping usually does use the full range of contrast (by definition). On the other hand you are right, the local contrasts are therefore reduced. With the two versions one can always mix and match. If you like, have a go, I have no problem with that.
Tim: You're right, it often is quite useful to look at the bigger versions of posted shots. All in all I find the resize function pretty impressive and it does help the readability of the posts.
Prieni
David: Yes, I also like how the sea shell shot turned out. Part of the appeal, I think, is that it is a fisheye shot. But the PP also pulls out a lot of detail in the individual shells.
Stefan: As far as I can see HDR/tonemapping usually does use the full range of contrast (by definition). On the other hand you are right, the local contrasts are therefore reduced. With the two versions one can always mix and match. If you like, have a go, I have no problem with that.
Tim: You're right, it often is quite useful to look at the bigger versions of posted shots. All in all I find the resize function pretty impressive and it does help the readability of the posts.
Prieni
How inappropriate to call this planet earth when it is quite clearly Ocean. - Arthur C. Clarke
Prieni's PPG page
Prieni's PPG page
Posted 30/11/2009 - 12:01
Link
i love the shell pic.
Pentax K20D, Pentax 18-55mm II, Pentax M 50mm 1: 1.7, Super Paragon 1: 2.8 24mm Macro, Pentax smc DA 50-200 mm F4-5.6 ED
my flickr
buy images
my flickr
buy images
Posted 30/11/2009 - 12:47
Link
Prieni if you truly mix and match it, this is what you get.
[IMG]http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk244/Anvh/Untitled1.jpg[/IMG]
Since there are 3 versions now it would be interesting to know which one you like, to get more insight in this subjective matter.
[IMG]http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk244/Anvh/Untitled1.jpg[/IMG]
Since there are 3 versions now it would be interesting to know which one you like, to get more insight in this subjective matter.
Posted 30/11/2009 - 13:46
Link
Stefan,
not surprisingly I like the version I posted first the best. This is because I had two layers, the second posted version and another one, more over the top than the first one. Then I adjusted the opacity of the OTT one to my liking.
I'll endeavour to post the OTT version tonight.
Prieni
not surprisingly I like the version I posted first the best. This is because I had two layers, the second posted version and another one, more over the top than the first one. Then I adjusted the opacity of the OTT one to my liking.
I'll endeavour to post the OTT version tonight.
Prieni
How inappropriate to call this planet earth when it is quite clearly Ocean. - Arthur C. Clarke
Prieni's PPG page
Prieni's PPG page
Posted 30/11/2009 - 19:15
Link
Well then, here are two further versions. First one up is the image as it came out of SilkyPix (i.e. a treated RAW interpretation):
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_PRI7362ori.jpg[/IMG]
That I put into Photoshop and produced the posted version #2 from above. Afterwards I got my old copy of Corel Photopaint fixed in Windows 7 (I like to think that it was my computer whizardry getting it to work again where most probably it healed itself when I updated the graphics tablet driver). In Photopaint there is the nice "local equalization" function that creates this version:
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_PRI7362leq.jpg[/IMG]
I then blended the two together (looking at the saturation it seems I used the layer mode soft light for the Photopaint result) to obtain the version posted first.
So all in all we have 5 versions of this shot (including Stefan's) and I do like all of them (and I'm a little bugged by the plastic bag behind the gate in all of them).
Prieni
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_PRI7362ori.jpg[/IMG]
That I put into Photoshop and produced the posted version #2 from above. Afterwards I got my old copy of Corel Photopaint fixed in Windows 7 (I like to think that it was my computer whizardry getting it to work again where most probably it healed itself when I updated the graphics tablet driver). In Photopaint there is the nice "local equalization" function that creates this version:
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_PRI7362leq.jpg[/IMG]
I then blended the two together (looking at the saturation it seems I used the layer mode soft light for the Photopaint result) to obtain the version posted first.
So all in all we have 5 versions of this shot (including Stefan's) and I do like all of them (and I'm a little bugged by the plastic bag behind the gate in all of them).
Prieni
How inappropriate to call this planet earth when it is quite clearly Ocean. - Arthur C. Clarke
Prieni's PPG page
Prieni's PPG page
Posted 30/11/2009 - 19:33
Link
Thank you Prieni, it certainly is quite extreme the effect.
You can of course clone out the plastic bag.
You can of course clone out the plastic bag.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



1469 posts
22 years
Rostock,
Germany
Here are a few of those:
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_PRI7366fc.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_PRI7362fc.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_PRI7382fc.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/Prieni/_PRI7427fc.jpg[/IMG]
As always C&C welcome,
Prieni
Prieni's PPG page