UV or Protector

Dr. Mhuni · 2008-11-22T08:40:06+0000

I want to get a filter to protect lenses when I am shooting in adverse conditions (and perhaps to keep on permanently, depending on its optical impact). Now I know an awful lot of people use UVs as protectors - and I was advised to purchase these when I bought the K10D kit (but didn't). However, my mate - who is a professional photographer - said that it was much better to get protector filters, as - with these being made of clear glass - they have less impact on output than a UV. When I mentioned to this to the bloke at the camera shop he pooh-poohed it. Has anyone got any thoughts as to who is right?

General Digital Photography DiscussionGeneral Digital Phot...

Add Comment

Mac Mac

744 posts
19 years
Montreal,
Quebec,
Canada

Posted 24/11/2008 - 09:58 Link

Peter, and Dr. Mhuni

Mia Culpa - I'm the guy who couldn't remember the correct name

I thought of lens hood - but that seemed to describe an undesirable goon who mugs you for your camera gear.

You're right of course, Peter - as always

Appologies

Mac from Montreal

SP, SPII, SPF, PZ-10, P30, SFX, K110D, istDS, Optio 60, Z-10, H90, RZ10, I-10, f3.5 28mm, f1.8 55mm, f1.4 50mm, f3.5 135mm, f2.5 135mm, f4 50mm Macro, f4.5 80-200 F, f4 35-70, f3.5 28-80, f3.5 35-135, f3.5 18-55, f1.8 31mm Ltd., two Auto 110's, Auto 110 lenses and filters, tubes, bellows, Manfrottos and a sore back.

Edited by Mac: 24/11/2008 - 10:45