Tree and Stone
Posted 01/04/2008 - 08:14
Link
Very interesting.
How do you create these images - in particular last week's competition entry :
How do you create these images - in particular last week's competition entry :
Hyram
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Posted 01/04/2008 - 08:38
Link
Tree and Stone was created by using Blending Modes in Photoshop and is made from two images.
The fireworks shot is a stack of separate images from Southport. All the fireworks were shot on B. The bridge for the foreground is the top shot. It too had a black sky, selected using Magic Wand and deleted, leaving the other shots behind visible. A little tidying and erasing to reveal more shots below and we get the composite.
Black skies are great for this technique as they are very easy to select and remove.
The fireworks shot is a stack of separate images from Southport. All the fireworks were shot on B. The bridge for the foreground is the top shot. It too had a black sky, selected using Magic Wand and deleted, leaving the other shots behind visible. A little tidying and erasing to reveal more shots below and we get the composite.
Black skies are great for this technique as they are very easy to select and remove.
Best regards, John
Posted 01/04/2008 - 11:28
Link
Not really my type of photography John but i am assuming you need to put a lot of work into it :
So i ask, what made you want rocks in the picture :
Sorry maybe i just don't get it
So i ask, what made you want rocks in the picture :
Sorry maybe i just don't get it
Camera:|K-7|
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
Posted 01/04/2008 - 11:54
Link
Have to agree with Clarky with this one. Your piano shot, with music overlaid, makes sense, but I don't see the connection between the stones and the tree... It looks as though it's a grassy landscape.
Dan
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Posted 01/04/2008 - 12:19
Link
While it is an arresting image, I'd prefer it without the stones. After the initial impact, I'm thinking, 'dammit, I can't see the tree!'.
Please call me aj,
I use a Pentax K10D, on a MacBook with LightRoom (vers 1.3 + beta 2)
http://www.ba-joseph.co.uk/gallery
I use a Pentax K10D, on a MacBook with LightRoom (vers 1.3 + beta 2)
http://www.ba-joseph.co.uk/gallery
Posted 01/04/2008 - 12:30
Link
Quote:
I think I like it . . . but I'm not sure. I need more time to digest it's visual attributes.
You do come up with some good ideas. Inspirational.
At first, I thought you might have some serious sensor cleaning to do
Lens swapping during an avalanche, doesn't seem a good idea I think I like it . . . but I'm not sure. I need more time to digest it's visual attributes.
You do come up with some good ideas. Inspirational.
At first, I thought you might have some serious sensor cleaning to do
But seriously.....,the stones are a bit to much for me. Maybe because I can imagine the tree picture without them. Very sereen and calm . A scene I would love to be for some landscaping.
Martin.
Posted 01/04/2008 - 12:32
Link
I like it.
Ok the relationship between stones and the tree is not clear, but I like the overall picture. The colours work well, the image in striking. It has an interesting surreal effect. I would hang it on my wall.
It is the sort of picture about which my ma-in-law would ask "But what's it supposed to be?". And when you reply "it just is" she goes "Oh".
A conversation we have had a couple of times - once for an Escher print, and once for the print of an abstract painting we have hanging on our walls.
Ok the relationship between stones and the tree is not clear, but I like the overall picture. The colours work well, the image in striking. It has an interesting surreal effect. I would hang it on my wall.
It is the sort of picture about which my ma-in-law would ask "But what's it supposed to be?". And when you reply "it just is" she goes "Oh".
A conversation we have had a couple of times - once for an Escher print, and once for the print of an abstract painting we have hanging on our walls.
Posted 01/04/2008 - 13:03
Link
They don't call JR the Dali of Atherton for nothing.
He's going to have to cultivate a waxed moustache.
I rather like the picture.
G
He's going to have to cultivate a waxed moustache.
I rather like the picture.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 01/04/2008 - 13:41
Link
I like the result very much
Posted 01/04/2008 - 14:12
Link
Well that got a few responses, many thanks for the comments.
The connection between stone and trees is that both are of the earth. The Earth is stone and the tree is life erupting from the rocky earth....
The Dali of Atherton, mmm, I like that, so perhaps I'll grow the moustache and post a picture.
The connection between stone and trees is that both are of the earth. The Earth is stone and the tree is life erupting from the rocky earth....
The Dali of Atherton, mmm, I like that, so perhaps I'll grow the moustache and post a picture.
Best regards, John
Posted 01/04/2008 - 14:20
Link
the color scheme works and the way the tree braches blend into the stones (becoming veins in appearance) is nice....
still, I'm a little lost because the image is busy, and doesn't draw me in, and hold my attention at any one point....
now if one of those stones had a shape with recognizable interest (ie shaped like an animal's or persons face) in a power point of the composition, it would elevate the peice from "Very Nice" to "How Much?$$$"
over all I really like it.
still, I'm a little lost because the image is busy, and doesn't draw me in, and hold my attention at any one point....
now if one of those stones had a shape with recognizable interest (ie shaped like an animal's or persons face) in a power point of the composition, it would elevate the peice from "Very Nice" to "How Much?$$$"
over all I really like it.
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 01/04/2008 - 16:23
Link
Mmm . . . I think the idea of putting the tree and stone together the effect you have created is really interesting. However like Don I feel that the image is too busy - my eye seems to be drawn to the empty space to the left of the tree. I also don't like the hard line that has been created on the right of the tree between the sky and the stone - It doesn't blend in in the same way as the other junctions between stone and sky.
Steve
Steve
Posted 01/04/2008 - 17:25
Link
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



24422 posts
24 years
Tyldesley,
Manchester