Thunderstorms

aliengrove
Posted 10/07/2011 - 18:25 Link
I have recently been attempting to photograph thundrstorms at night,using the K5, with varying levels of success. Exposures seem to work best around 4-10 seconds, depending how active the storm is. If there's more than one major flash during the exposure, the pictures end up blurred as they are handheld. The first shot was taken at 6400 ISO , 3 seconds, using the Sigma 18-250 at 65mm. The second two were using the Sigma 24mm f2.8 Super-Wide II wide open, at 10 seconds and 3 seconds respectively. I just need to find a way of stabilising the camera a bit better! C+C, and any suggestions or ideas on how to improve my technique, most welcome.


Comment Image



Comment Image



Comment Image
Edited by aliengrove: 10/07/2011 - 18:26
DrOrloff
Posted 10/07/2011 - 18:28 Link
Fly more smoothly.
ChrisA
Posted 10/07/2011 - 18:50 Link
Open the window, obviously...
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Hardgravity
Posted 10/07/2011 - 18:58 Link
You need to improve?

#2 and #3 are super, just keep taking as many as possible, after all, digital shots don't need developing so...
Cheers, HG

K110+DA40, K200+DA35, K3 and a bag of lenses, bodies and other bits.

Mustn't forget the Zenits, or folders, or...

PPG entries.
Smeggypants
Posted 10/07/2011 - 18:59 Link
Love #2 and #3
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
bretti_kivi
Posted 10/07/2011 - 20:05 Link
2 and 3 are great. No chance of a monopod? Or a fat gecko? (google it!)

Bret
my pics: link
my kit: K3, K5, K-01, DA 18-55, D-FA50 macro, Siggy 30/1.4, 100-300/f4, 70-200/2.8, Samsung 12-24/f4, Tamron 17-50, and lots of other bits.
Edited by bretti_kivi: 10/07/2011 - 20:06
aliengrove
Posted 10/07/2011 - 20:42 Link
bretti_kivi wrote:
2 and 3 are great. No chance of a monopod? Or a fat gecko? (google it!)

Bret
I had a look at one of those, it's bit large unfortunately. I did fiddle with a Gorillapod, but there's not really anything to attach it to. Also, if it's turbulent, I guess arms work better than anything attched to the aircraaf; though it was pretty smooth when I took these as we always try to stay upwind of storms.
womble
Posted 10/07/2011 - 20:49 Link
Hardgravity wrote:
#2 and #3 are super...
I agree. Nicely done. K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
aliengrove
Posted 10/07/2011 - 20:54 Link
Thanks Kris, and everyone else, for the comments. I still think I can improve my technique somehow. I nearly lost these pics when the memory card disintegrated when I took it out of the camera!
japers45
Posted 10/07/2011 - 21:05 Link
I really like these. I think the softness lends an etheral quality. For me you shouldnt try and stabilise but experiment more with handheld long exposures.

I can google a picture of a storm anytime- these are more interesting.
dougf8
Posted 10/07/2011 - 21:14 Link
Very evocative.

Maybe multiple exposures? Assembled in PS.

And decouple the vibrations with a steady cam apparatus and a sprung mass dampening system, say .... your arm.
Lurking is shirking.!
Edited by dougf8: 10/07/2011 - 21:26
matwhittington
Posted 10/07/2011 - 22:14 Link
These are great. I agree that there is *something* about them not being quite sharp. Not sure I have a good idea on how to stabilize. Maybe a rubber lens hood will enable you to get a bit of friction between the end of the lens and the window and add a little further stability.

I especially like number 2 - looks like an A-bomb in the distance!

Regards
Mat W

My Flickr: link
dougf8
Posted 12/07/2011 - 22:53 Link
Bingo, gyroscopic mount!!!!!!!
probably not cheap nor easy to explain to the security folks.

but if the camera is rock solid the clouds will move slightly relative so not a full solution.
Lurking is shirking.!
Edited by dougf8: 12/07/2011 - 22:54
Mannesty
Posted 12/07/2011 - 23:07 Link
Strap the camera to a heavy hard disk drive, and spin it up, the faster the better. Hey presto, a DIY gyro-mount.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
davidtrout
Posted 13/07/2011 - 21:17 Link
#2 is absolutely superb. The others aren't so bad either. Somehow I can't imagine you using a tripod on a flight deck but the rubber lens hood pressed against the window sounds like a good idea to increase stablization. As othe others say, keep snapping them and some are boundg to work out big time as your practice pays off.
David

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo