More IR - and some with people in...

karma mechanic
Posted 14/07/2011 - 17:01 Link
Today's lunchtime trip was to achieve two things - paulyrichards had suggested I tried some old buildings, and japers45 had wondered what people look like in IR.

First the old building - Netley Abbey. The clouds weren't looking at all promising so I concentrated on a couple of very wide views:

1.
Comment Image



2.
Comment Image


Then a couple of minutes away is the shore of Southampton Water. There were people there Rather than have them clutter up the shots I used them - very unlike me

3.
Comment Image


4.
Comment Image


Five more minutes walking got me to the military cemetery at Victoria Hospital:

5.
Comment Image


6.
Comment Image


All on the modified GX1L, Sigma 10-20 at 10mm f/8, manual exposure of 1/90th for the building ones, 1/180th for all the others. OK, the people aren't very close, but it's a start
My own website is www.richardgaddphotography.com

Also on 500px
japers45
Posted 14/07/2011 - 17:34 Link
People don't look as different as I thought they would. Having said that I think #5 & #6 are incredible.
johnriley
Posted 14/07/2011 - 18:03 Link
I rather like No.5 - have you tried any IR portraits yet?
Best regards, John
OldTaffy
Posted 14/07/2011 - 18:08 Link
I like them all; perhaps 3 & 6 impress me most for the perfect exposure and dynamic range. How do you go about setting exposure? You state that it is manual. Do you judge by an instant review image, or do you call up a histogram etc in a playback mode? I have no idea what the facilities are in a (modified) GX1L.

Martin
A few of my photographs in flickr.
Lizars 1910 "Challenge" quarter-plate camera; and some more recent stuff.
petrochemist
Posted 14/07/2011 - 18:20 Link
japers45 wrote:
People don't look as different as I thought they would. Having said that I think #5 & #6 are incredible.
Skin generally looks much smoother in IR, removing surface blemishes etc.
One of the other Forums I browse has an excellent comparison of Visible IR & UV portraits

My own experiment in IR portraits is less successful see here in my PU portfolio.
Mike
.
Pentax:K5ii, K7, K100D, DA18-55, DA10-17, DA55-300, DA50-200, F100-300, F50, DA35 AL, 4* M50, 2* M135, Helicoid extension, Tak 300 f4 (& 6 film bodies)
3rd Party: Bigmos (Sigma 150-500mm OS HSM),2* 28mm, 100mm macro, 28-200 zoom, 35-80 zoom, 80-200 zoom, 80-210 zoom, 300mm M42, 600 mirror, 1000-4000 scope, 50mm M42, enlarger lenses, Sony & micro 4/3 cameras with various PK mounts, Zenit E...
Far to many tele-converters, adapters, project parts & extension tubes etc.

.[size=11:].Flickr• WPF• Panoramio
Pentaxophile
Posted 14/07/2011 - 18:26 Link
More amazing images. No. 1 and 4 stand out for me but they're all pretty mind blowing!
karma mechanic
Posted 14/07/2011 - 18:27 Link
Regarding exposure, for the kit 18-55 I tend to use Av mode with between +1 and +2 EV for open space shots (lots of light) or -1 or -2 EV for ones in darker areas such as the woods (less visible light but lots of IR scattered from folaige).

The Sigma tends to be even more variable, so for that lens it is easier on a day like today to simply set 1/180th at f/8 and check the histogram occasionally. These are done in raw so there is still quite a bit of correction available in Bibble.

Then ones I like the look of are exported to Photoshop where I use Topaz Adjust to intensify the false colour and the details, with some adaptive exposure depending on the original contrast. Then that version is the one converted to mono, using the amount of red channel to vary the look of the clouds - you'll see an example of a false colour one in the Winnall Moors thread from a couple of days ago.
My own website is www.richardgaddphotography.com

Also on 500px
Smeggypants
Posted 14/07/2011 - 19:28 Link
Superb shots!!!!

I love them all
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
stopher
Posted 14/07/2011 - 20:20 Link
Another excellent set!
thoughton
Posted 14/07/2011 - 20:32 Link
1-4 are okay (they don't look like IR at all just BW), 6 is good, and 5 is brilliant. Love it.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Edited by thoughton: 14/07/2011 - 20:33
matwhittington
Posted 14/07/2011 - 21:15 Link
5 and 6 for me - awesome. Great stuff
Mat W

My Flickr: link
Dodge69
Posted 14/07/2011 - 22:10 Link
All great, but number 2 for me easily stands out.
Pentax pour des images riches en dιtails!
aliengrove
Posted 15/07/2011 - 12:06 Link
Another great set of shots, 2, 5 and 6 are my favourites but I like all of them.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo