thoughts

womble
Posted 28/02/2016 - 14:23 Link
davidtrout wrote:

Is the K1 really significantly heavier than a K3?
David
Nope. K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
McBrian
Posted 28/02/2016 - 15:08 Link
stu62 wrote:
just to pass the time on a cold saterday morning i went on a little road trip to srs

k1 is a nice piece of kit with the grip

but there is one down side and that is k1 with grip +150/450 lens (and i know what you are all thinking the price ) but no it actually is not its just you have to be jeff capes to handle it
Well to be fair, the K3/K3II with the 150-450 is a hefty kit also, does 150-250 grams really make that much of a difference
Cheers
Brian.
LBA is good for you, a Lens a day helps you work, rest and play.
DrOrloff
Posted 28/02/2016 - 16:47 Link
womble wrote:
With lenses like the 43mm the K-1 is no worse than the K10/20/7/5/3. It only becomes big and bulky when you add a grip or some of the big new fast lenses. As to going back to 35mm angles-of-view, some of us never left them entirely! Apart from trying to justify spending more money on a camera body than we spent on our car, my biggest quandry is what I would do with my beloved 50-135, or my 12-24...
I have those as well. I think I will just continue to use the 50-135. I reckon that you'll get more than the 16mp crop from it at most settings anyway (subject to edge and corner performance when important). Even in crop mode it should be enough for most images I use it for.

For landscape the 15-30 is going to be a must have lens I think. Bit annoying that it will require a whole, new expensive filter set. The 12-24 I will keep as a back-up I think.
stu62
Posted 28/02/2016 - 16:49 Link
Is the K1 really significantly heavier than a K3?
David[/quote]the awnser to that is no

it is when you start putting the new lenses on that you start to notice but then the lenses are a lot bigger so a lot more glass

i just have to con the wife now so i can have one
DaveKitson
Posted 28/02/2016 - 19:50 Link
DrOrloff wrote:

Bit annoying that it will require a whole, new expensive filter set.
I don't think that the 15-30 has a front thread for filters.

dave k
DrOrloff
Posted 28/02/2016 - 20:00 Link
DaveKitson wrote:
DrOrloff wrote:

Bit annoying that it will require a whole, new expensive filter set.
I don't think that the 15-30 has a front thread for filters.

dave k
It doesn't, that's why a filter set and special ring/holder will be expensive.
Algernon
Posted 28/02/2016 - 20:10 Link
What's the weight in practical objects such as pints or steins of beer

This Bavarian Barmaid will give you a hand if it's too heavy

https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/p/4/005/073/08e/0414e61.jpg

A stein of beer weighs 2.3 kilograms
--
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber

Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff

Algi
Edited by Algernon: 28/02/2016 - 20:13
OldTaffy
Posted 28/02/2016 - 22:46 Link
Algernon wrote:
... This Bavarian Barmaid will give you a hand if it's too heavy

https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/p/4/005/073/08e/0414e61.jpg

--
Too frothy for my taste. And the beer has an awful lot of head on it too.

Martin
A few of my photographs in flickr.
Lizars 1910 "Challenge" quarter-plate camera; and some more recent stuff.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo