the future of the evolution in electronic imaging..
Posted 04/11/2011 - 14:15
Link
Don wrote:
Pentax, Ricoh, please please please..
answer back with something in a k-mount
Might get an articulated screen with the K-3....
Pentax, Ricoh, please please please..
answer back with something in a k-mount
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Posted 04/11/2011 - 19:39
Link
ChrisA wrote:
that would be nice!
Don wrote:
Pentax, Ricoh, please please please..
answer back with something in a k-mount
Might get an articulated screen with the K-3....Pentax, Ricoh, please please please..
answer back with something in a k-mount
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 04/11/2011 - 22:58
Link
Can you mount K glass with an adapter?
Posted 04/11/2011 - 23:14
Link
smc wrote:
Can you mount K glass with an adapter?
to the sony, yes to the canon, no. the canon is full frame, and expensive....Can you mount K glass with an adapter?
What I'd like to see is a Pentax product that does both photos and video at the professional level... period..
That canon is going to be the way ALL serious cameras come in the future.... a consumer version of that camera, will kill d-slrs in the market place... if canon or sony release something like that in the $1200.00 range Pentax will take a hit that they might never recover from in the market place... it isn't about the existing Pentax shooters... it is all the new buyers that have never shot a slr or d-slr that will find this new type of imaging device superior to d-slrs and throw thier money at those systems....
it will do everything a d-slr will do, plus everything a video camera will do, and be a bargian since you only have to buy one body....
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 05/11/2011 - 08:52
Link
There's a list somewhere of what lenses work with Canon's.
Ricehigh also has some Pentax/Canon info.
Ricehigh also has some Pentax/Canon info.
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 05/11/2011 - 13:45
Link
What I find interesting is that Canon has developed BOTH the video cam form factor and a d-slr form factor for this camera.
As a shooter that uses both videocameras and Dslrs when shooting projects... I must say the video cam form factor is easier to work with.... regardless of wether you're shooting video or stills...
Zacuto has already released a line of expensive add-ons for people looking to shoot video with the d-slr version... but what add-ons does the video cam version require to shoot stills? nada, none, zip.... so which is the better buy?
I'm curious to see which they sell more of... I think the market place will be the deciding factor....
As a shooter that uses both videocameras and Dslrs when shooting projects... I must say the video cam form factor is easier to work with.... regardless of wether you're shooting video or stills...
Zacuto has already released a line of expensive add-ons for people looking to shoot video with the d-slr version... but what add-ons does the video cam version require to shoot stills? nada, none, zip.... so which is the better buy?
I'm curious to see which they sell more of... I think the market place will be the deciding factor....
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 05/11/2011 - 15:44
Link
The videocam style has been available for stills before from Rollei, Chinon and others, but has never proved popular with stills photographers.
This new camera seems to offer only 1920x1080 resolution, which just isn't enough for stills. Although it may well take DSLR lenses, it's not really a substitute for a DSLR camera.
This new camera seems to offer only 1920x1080 resolution, which just isn't enough for stills. Although it may well take DSLR lenses, it's not really a substitute for a DSLR camera.
Best regards, John
Posted 05/11/2011 - 15:49
Link
johnriley wrote:
The videocam style has been available for stills before from Rollei, Chinon and others, but has never proved popular with stills photographers.
This new camera seems to offer only 1920x1080 resolution, which just isn't enough for stills. Although it may well take DSLR lenses, it's not really a substitute for a DSLR camera.
early reports are it is creating 8mp stills off a Foveon type sensor... meaning there are 4 seperate light receptors per pixel site (red, blue and two green) so the color depth is high and a 12 stop dynamic range... I suspect the image resolution for stills will compare favorably with a lot of other d-slrs.... at least as good as my k10...The videocam style has been available for stills before from Rollei, Chinon and others, but has never proved popular with stills photographers.
This new camera seems to offer only 1920x1080 resolution, which just isn't enough for stills. Although it may well take DSLR lenses, it's not really a substitute for a DSLR camera.
too early to tell though... I'm sure that since there is simultanious developement of slr and video cam models the same sensor MUST produce decent stills...
Besides, I'd rather join my cat at the vet for neutering than buy a canon... I just want to be able to buy something like that from Pentax!
2k video is fine, no need go for 4k...
long recording times, meaning a heat sink for cooling...
full manual control...
and the ability to record stills and video simultaniously to seperate cards...
a nice oled evf and articulated touch screen
all with the guts and sensor from a k5
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 05/11/2011 - 15:54
Link
The Foveon style sensors try to convince us that their resolution is 3x the value for R, G and B but it isn't. The number of pixels remains as it is and that limits severely the print size. It also gives an odd colour rendition which many people don't like too much.
Best regards, John
Posted 05/11/2011 - 15:54
Link
johnriley wrote:
The Foveon style sensors try to convince us that their resolution is 3x the value for R, G and B but it isn't. The number of pixels remains as it is and that limits severely the print size. It also gives an odd colour rendition which many people don't like too much.
also overpriced....The Foveon style sensors try to convince us that their resolution is 3x the value for R, G and B but it isn't. The number of pixels remains as it is and that limits severely the print size. It also gives an odd colour rendition which many people don't like too much.
also of interest is the new line of video specific lenses... a pentax evf video model that takes the standard k-mount would already have a nice line of lenses for existing lenses, and open the door for pentax to introduce a line of "V" lenses that are video optomized.... for shooters that like video as much as stills..
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 05/11/2011 - 16:43
Link
I think that probably video shooters are an afterthought in the minds of the designers, but it must be a huge market in its own right.
Having said that, most users find a clip on their compacts or iPhones perfectly adequate for a slot on Facebook or YouTube and that's maybe where the bulk of the casual market is.
Having said that, most users find a clip on their compacts or iPhones perfectly adequate for a slot on Facebook or YouTube and that's maybe where the bulk of the casual market is.
Best regards, John
Posted 05/11/2011 - 17:03
Link
johnriley wrote:
I think that probably video shooters are an afterthought in the minds of the designers, but it must be a huge market in its own right.
Having said that, most users find a clip on their compacts or iPhones perfectly adequate for a slot on Facebook or YouTube and that's maybe where the bulk of the casual market is.
Hollywood is dead baby.... indie film makers, and direct to consumer downloads are the future of BOTH television, and movie making. The serious shooters want large sensors, low light abilities (to save on lighting expenses) pro audio and high quality glass.... anybody that wants to sell high end cameras needs to look a t serving both pro video and pro still quality... what wedding photographer out there will be offering EITHER photos or videos, when the brides are demanding BOTH?I think that probably video shooters are an afterthought in the minds of the designers, but it must be a huge market in its own right.
Having said that, most users find a clip on their compacts or iPhones perfectly adequate for a slot on Facebook or YouTube and that's maybe where the bulk of the casual market is.
give it a few years...
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 05/11/2011 - 17:26
Link
here is an interesting look behind filming the Hobbit with RED cams..peter jackson...
The RED system is more affordable than traditional hollywood pro cameras...
An indie film maker could very easily create stunning works with a k-5 sized camera... and some Pentax lenses on an achievable budget... we really aren't that far behind hollywood in terms of filmmaking gear, the prosumer market is progressing faster do to lower prices and higher sales.... Ricoh/Pentax would sell a lot of lenses and bodies if they give the video shooters equal thought to the still photographers in future camera models...
just like the Wedding market is saturated with tonnes of "I have a nice camera, therefore I'm a pro, let me shoot your wedding for table scraps and five bucks" photographers buying cameras, so too will major motion film making get swamped with "I have a nice camera, let's film a movie for table scraps and five bucks" film makers....
and major studios will find amateurs coming out from everywhere to take a bite of thier profits.. and they will all be buying cameras from somebody...why not Pentax?
see the part where they're talking about 128 gig cards?

48 cameras priced at $1200.00 ? alot cheaper than the RED. Pro video at $1200.00 or less each are coming.. from Canon, Nikon and Panasonic... and hopefully Ricoh will push Pentax to do more serious video.
The RED system is more affordable than traditional hollywood pro cameras...
An indie film maker could very easily create stunning works with a k-5 sized camera... and some Pentax lenses on an achievable budget... we really aren't that far behind hollywood in terms of filmmaking gear, the prosumer market is progressing faster do to lower prices and higher sales.... Ricoh/Pentax would sell a lot of lenses and bodies if they give the video shooters equal thought to the still photographers in future camera models...
just like the Wedding market is saturated with tonnes of "I have a nice camera, therefore I'm a pro, let me shoot your wedding for table scraps and five bucks" photographers buying cameras, so too will major motion film making get swamped with "I have a nice camera, let's film a movie for table scraps and five bucks" film makers....
and major studios will find amateurs coming out from everywhere to take a bite of thier profits.. and they will all be buying cameras from somebody...why not Pentax?
see the part where they're talking about 128 gig cards?

48 cameras priced at $1200.00 ? alot cheaper than the RED. Pro video at $1200.00 or less each are coming.. from Canon, Nikon and Panasonic... and hopefully Ricoh will push Pentax to do more serious video.
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


6213 posts
20 years
Winterpeg Manitoba Canada
Sony has the nex vg20 on the amatuer front..
Canon has launched the ultimate pro version here:
link
Pentax, Ricoh, please please please..
answer back with something in a k-mount so I can continue with my desire to make films as well as stills, with my pentax glass...