Tamron 17-50?
Posted 01/12/2013 - 12:56 - Helpful Comment
Link
It is a stunning lens Mac, I really loved mine and never noticed any of the supposed softness that some have suggested the lens suffers from.
I sold mine to fund a Sigma f2.8 24-70 and to be honest IQ wise, I haven't really felt I gained anything spectacular quality wise.
At f2.8 it is great for low light too, buy it, you won't be disappointed!
I sold mine to fund a Sigma f2.8 24-70 and to be honest IQ wise, I haven't really felt I gained anything spectacular quality wise.
At f2.8 it is great for low light too, buy it, you won't be disappointed!
Posted 01/12/2013 - 12:57
Link
THanks Andrew.
Hope you are keeping well!
Mac
Hope you are keeping well!
Mac
Posted 01/12/2013 - 13:46
Link
Pretty good- minor knee op next Saturday- tripod for support I reckon!
AndrewA wrote:
Simonmac wrote:
THanks Andrew.
Hope you are keeping well!
Mac
Yes thanks Mac, you?THanks Andrew.
Hope you are keeping well!
Mac
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
718 posts
14 years
Birmingham
I am looking at the Tamron via SRS and wish to know if it will a big improvement over the kit.
Just purchased 35mm 2.4, great lens, bit I feel a little restricted (I do use my feet!). Does the Tamron match the Pentax at equivalent focal length as I will sell the 35mm to part fund.
Many thanks
Mac
www.500px.com/simac