Subjective Comments please.
Posted 11/09/2013 - 19:49
Link
If I could afford either (which I can't) I'd go for the 31mm Ltd.
For me, a lens this fast is something I use rarely, but when I want it there's nothing else that will do. Therefore my fast lens has to be small enough to live in my camera bag without taking up too much space. The sigma is just too large to take on this role for me, and the range is too short for an everyday standard zoom.
The 31mm Ltd on the other hand would live where my FA 50 1.4 currently does, nestled in the bottom of one of my bag pockets, ready for action at a moments notice but otherwise out of the way.
For me, a lens this fast is something I use rarely, but when I want it there's nothing else that will do. Therefore my fast lens has to be small enough to live in my camera bag without taking up too much space. The sigma is just too large to take on this role for me, and the range is too short for an everyday standard zoom.
The 31mm Ltd on the other hand would live where my FA 50 1.4 currently does, nestled in the bottom of one of my bag pockets, ready for action at a moments notice but otherwise out of the way.
you don't have to be mad to post here
but it does help
but it does help
Posted 11/09/2013 - 20:03
Link
I know the 31mm LTD has such a great reputation that if I had the chance thats what I would be seizing. The size makes it a special thing - both for carrying when you don't want a camera bag, plus the handling when on the camera.
Of course, f1.8 for any zoom is also special, and no doubt this Sigma is a quality item. But surely for most applications at the wider end of this range (18mm+) f2.8 would be wide enough? I'm not sure there would be that many images that would demand f1.8, or even benefit from it,at this wider end?
Traditionally such wide apertures were for the light gathering aspect, not extreme DOF, and now we can get the light gathering through higher ISO anyway.
Of course, f1.8 for any zoom is also special, and no doubt this Sigma is a quality item. But surely for most applications at the wider end of this range (18mm+) f2.8 would be wide enough? I'm not sure there would be that many images that would demand f1.8, or even benefit from it,at this wider end?
Traditionally such wide apertures were for the light gathering aspect, not extreme DOF, and now we can get the light gathering through higher ISO anyway.
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Posted 11/09/2013 - 20:27
Link
If it were a straight choice probably the Sigma.
I just feel that based on the 2 Sigma lenses that I own that the quality is superb and the flexibility of the 18-35 zoom range would be nice to have.
I just feel that based on the 2 Sigma lenses that I own that the quality is superb and the flexibility of the 18-35 zoom range would be nice to have.
Posted 11/09/2013 - 20:29
Link
I'd get the Sigma. 1.8 @ 18mm through to 35mm would be great.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 12/09/2013 - 07:28
Link
Thanks for your views guys. Looks like it's 50 / 50 as to what people would choose. I have ordered the Sigma as I think the focal lengths will cover a few bases and I love that fixed f/1.8. The FA 31 still seems to wear a crown in reviews though. I wonder if the FA Ltd's will get the HD coating treatment, and are the blades in the FA 31 rounded?
Fletcher8.
Posted 12/09/2013 - 07:41
Link
I will do Andrew, I think they are due for UK distribution early October.
Fletcher8.
Posted 12/09/2013 - 22:20
Link
I'd definitely go for the Sigma, more versatile, and they've really upped their game in the last couple of years. I love my 15mm Ltd, but I have to say that the Sigma 8-16mm out-performs it at 15mm, except in distortion, which I've now got the hang of anyway.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1017 posts
17 years
I just wanted to ask which of these lens would you buy? I know they are different focal lengths and one is a prime vs a Zoom. Obviously comments will be subjective, but I am interested in opinions and reasons why, for and against.
Pentax 31mm f/1.8 FA Limited
Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM