Some PPG acceptances
Posted 18/11/2009 - 07:52
Link
Enjoy the first and last but not sure about the cottage or the car. Agree the rotating of the last is better, it seems to have more depth.
Congratulations.
Congratulations.
Jackie H
K7, K20D, istDS, Optio SV, ME
Most used glass
50mm f1.4, 60-250mm, 28-80mm,
Sigma 105mm 2.8 Macro & Bertha 50-500
K7, K20D, istDS, Optio SV, ME
Most used glass
50mm f1.4, 60-250mm, 28-80mm,
Sigma 105mm 2.8 Macro & Bertha 50-500
Posted 18/11/2009 - 12:59
Link
I really like the cottage one, Tim. There's something about it, but I can't explain what.
Matt
GX20; DA 17-70 F4; 18-55 kit; Ricoh 50mm F2; Vivitar 75-205mm F3.8
GX20; DA 17-70 F4; 18-55 kit; Ricoh 50mm F2; Vivitar 75-205mm F3.8
Posted 18/11/2009 - 16:00
Link
Well done again.
I think the time is all to do with how popular it is with the Pentax voters, the quicker it gets to a certain percentage the faster the acceptance. As for submitting the same picture in a different orientation I did that with a water drop but all I did was change the colour of the water .. did it in Yellow, green and blue .. all 3 got accepted.
I decided it was a bit unfair and deleted 2 of them from the gallery
I think the time is all to do with how popular it is with the Pentax voters, the quicker it gets to a certain percentage the faster the acceptance. As for submitting the same picture in a different orientation I did that with a water drop but all I did was change the colour of the water .. did it in Yellow, green and blue .. all 3 got accepted.
I decided it was a bit unfair and deleted 2 of them from the gallery
Posted 18/11/2009 - 16:08
Link
Thanks for the comments everyone!
Mike - yeah maybe I will submit the horizontal one and if it gets in I will delete the vertical one. Since I only have a measly 8 entries I can't be deleting them willy nilly like you multiple-dozen guys can
Mike - yeah maybe I will submit the horizontal one and if it gets in I will delete the vertical one. Since I only have a measly 8 entries I can't be deleting them willy nilly like you multiple-dozen guys can
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 18/11/2009 - 17:01
Link
Congratulations! I agree with you on the science museum one, looks better rotated (and you can submit it bigger that way round!). I would give it a try, if only just for fun.
The aircraft engine and cottage shots are great, the car is all right. I get this a lot with car shots, I do like them when I take them and when I look at them at home they don't give me much. It is a competent shot of a nice car, all right, but somehow it's lacking something for my taste.
I had little success the last weeks, images lingering for weeks and then they are declined.
Must try harder...
Prieni
The aircraft engine and cottage shots are great, the car is all right. I get this a lot with car shots, I do like them when I take them and when I look at them at home they don't give me much. It is a competent shot of a nice car, all right, but somehow it's lacking something for my taste.
I had little success the last weeks, images lingering for weeks and then they are declined.
Must try harder...
Prieni
How inappropriate to call this planet earth when it is quite clearly Ocean. - Arthur C. Clarke
Prieni's PPG page
Prieni's PPG page
Posted 18/11/2009 - 20:08
Link
Love the first three B&W shots, really crisp with an excellent feel to thems but unfortunately the colour ones don't work for me, too fussy, but hay ho that's only my opinion.
A poor life this, if full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare. W.H Davies
We have no time to stand and stare. W.H Davies
Posted 18/11/2009 - 20:20
Link
Thanks Prieni, any words from a 100+ PPG man are much appreciated You should put your link in your sig, so us mere mortals can occasionally drop in and appreciate your photos. Seriously, they are fantastic!
I know what you mean about the car. The original colour version was (rightly) rejected back in the summer, it's only the last couple of months since I've been getting hooked on B&W that I revisited some of my older shots and resubmitted them. I think the B&W conversion is good (excuse my big head) but the shot is missing some oomph. A scantily-clad lady lying across the bonnet perhaps
Noddy thanks for the kind words. The stack of coloured cardboard is very much a matter of taste. At first I didn't like it but it has definitely grown on me. My wife thinks it's a pointless photo of a pointless object
Alig thanks. That photo was originally entitled No. 144, but I later went with The Cottage instead
I know what you mean about the car. The original colour version was (rightly) rejected back in the summer, it's only the last couple of months since I've been getting hooked on B&W that I revisited some of my older shots and resubmitted them. I think the B&W conversion is good (excuse my big head) but the shot is missing some oomph. A scantily-clad lady lying across the bonnet perhaps
Noddy thanks for the kind words. The stack of coloured cardboard is very much a matter of taste. At first I didn't like it but it has definitely grown on me. My wife thinks it's a pointless photo of a pointless object
Alig thanks. That photo was originally entitled No. 144, but I later went with The Cottage instead
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 18/11/2009 - 20:24
Link
I'm in the camp of those who like the cottage.
I also feel that your B&W conversions are extremely competently done. They must look lovely printed on good paper.
G
I also feel that your B&W conversions are extremely competently done. They must look lovely printed on good paper.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 18/11/2009 - 20:31
Link
thoughton wrote:
Thanks Prieni, any words from a 100+ PPG man are much appreciated
100? ruddy hell, that's impressive .. I don't think I have submitted anywhere near that amount. Thanks Prieni, any words from a 100+ PPG man are much appreciated
thoughton wrote:
My wife thinks it's a pointless photo of a pointless object
I get the distinct impression my wife thinks that about all of my pictures.
My wife thinks it's a pointless photo of a pointless object
Posted 18/11/2009 - 20:41
Link
Thanks George! I wish I could say I had huge prints of my finest work all over my house, but I don't. The only display medium in my house is the AppleTV screensaver playing on my 28" TV which cycles through my photos (to be fair the screensaver is on most of the day). I haven't had a photo printed in years
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 18/11/2009 - 20:50
Link
Mike-P wrote:
Actually I was just joking. Ralf has some huge number in the PPG, but I don't think it's quite 100 ... he posted here when he hit 50 a few months ago.thoughton wrote:
Thanks Prieni, any words from a 100+ PPG man are much appreciated
100? ruddy hell, that's impressive .. I don't think I have submitted anywhere near that amount. Thanks Prieni, any words from a 100+ PPG man are much appreciated
Mike-P wrote:
Haha, so true
thoughton wrote:
My wife thinks it's a pointless photo of a pointless object
I get the distinct impression my wife thinks that about all of my pictures.My wife thinks it's a pointless photo of a pointless object
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 18/11/2009 - 20:52
Link
thoughton wrote:
I haven't had a photo printed in years
Nor me. But I would if I had some really nice B&Ws.I haven't had a photo printed in years
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


4798 posts
17 years
Saffron Walden,
Essex
I posted this one here recently:
This was one i took over the summer in Halesworth, Suffolk.
Another one from the summer, taken in a car park in Saffron Walden.
This one is from a display in the science museum. I was surprised this got accepted, I made a right mess of the dof. The vertical orientation also bugged me even though that is how it actually looked:
Here's the last image again, but rotated. I much prefer this orientation. Perhaps I should submit this as well :
Interestingly the time scales were drastically different on these 4 images. My previous acceptances all involved waits of several weeks. Out of these four the cottage was under review for about 3 weeks, the car about 2 weeks, the coloured layers took 5 days, and the engine was accepted only 3 days after submission. I don't know if that says anything about the popularity of the photo or if the review process is just getting faster.
Thanks for looking!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!