So how good is the K-5 sensor
Posted 16/11/2010 - 14:08
Link
K10D wrote:
Aplogies if this has been linked before.
link
It's all good stuff. Never saw this amount of activity in a LONG time.
One comment on another thread said that the K5 & D7000 are distant cousins. I say the companies are watching each other with great respect.
My overall impression? The cameras are getting better, now where is my K3?
Best regards
Interesting link Gary, looking at the comparisons I would have thought RAW processed by identical workflow would have been used for a closer to level playing field comparison.Aplogies if this has been linked before.
link
It's all good stuff. Never saw this amount of activity in a LONG time.
One comment on another thread said that the K5 & D7000 are distant cousins. I say the companies are watching each other with great respect.
My overall impression? The cameras are getting better, now where is my K3?
Best regards
However I do think the lens choice is relevant, both are good quality primes, are well respected for their optical quality and therefore to me it gives more of 'realworld' comparison.
I suspect the difference is more down to the Jpeg engine in both cameras than lens quality per-say. With RAW output I'm sure the Pentax would have the potential to draw level or even nudge ahead
(low pass filter influence aside).
Posted 16/11/2010 - 23:23
Link
Greytop wrote:
However I do think the lens choice is relevant, both are good quality primes, are well respected for their optical quality and therefore to me it gives more of 'realworld' comparison.
I suspect the difference is more down to the Jpeg engine in both cameras than lens quality per-say. With RAW output I'm sure the Pentax would have the potential to draw level or even nudge ahead
(low pass filter influence aside).
It's a win win situation for both camps, Pentax and Nikon. No one will jump ship for either model, but each offer their respective users marked improvements over existing class models. I need a second Nikon body and was all set up to buy another D700, until the D7000 appeared.K10D wrote:
Aplogies if this has been linked before.
link
It's all good stuff. Never saw this amount of activity in a LONG time.
One comment on another thread said that the K5 & D7000 are distant cousins. I say the companies are watching each other with great respect.
My overall impression? The cameras are getting better, now where is my K3?
Best regards
Interesting link Gary, looking at the comparisons I would have thought RAW processed by identical workflow would have been used for a closer to level playing field comparison.Aplogies if this has been linked before.
link
It's all good stuff. Never saw this amount of activity in a LONG time.
One comment on another thread said that the K5 & D7000 are distant cousins. I say the companies are watching each other with great respect.
My overall impression? The cameras are getting better, now where is my K3?
Best regards
However I do think the lens choice is relevant, both are good quality primes, are well respected for their optical quality and therefore to me it gives more of 'realworld' comparison.
I suspect the difference is more down to the Jpeg engine in both cameras than lens quality per-say. With RAW output I'm sure the Pentax would have the potential to draw level or even nudge ahead
(low pass filter influence aside).
Will I buy a K-5, let's wait and see. Long term (1 year), I want to see what a D4 and a K-? offer, once they arrive.
Best regards
Too far from a shore.
Posted 17/11/2010 - 22:56
Link
On a different course, with the current interest with the K5 which is surely going to be a positive for Pentax and Hoya, what are the chances of some new lenses being developed, any thoughts as to what may be comming around the corner?
Fletcher8.
Posted 17/11/2010 - 23:06
Link
28, 50, 70 mm versions of old lens designs now in all plastic bodies like the 35mm 2.4....
wr versions of the ltds.....
and a 600 mm f5.6 wr....
no need to re-invent the wheel, when you can slip some new tires on your old rims....
the reason I speculate on the 600 is this.... somebody correct me if I'm wrong....
if they can release the same lens using many of the same elements, one optimized for the 645-d and one re-engineered for the k-5 they can share some of the developing costs between two market segments and appeal to nature photogs from both k-5 and 645d buyers...
and if it can focus fast... you maay see Pentax at sporting events again....
wr versions of the ltds.....
and a 600 mm f5.6 wr....
no need to re-invent the wheel, when you can slip some new tires on your old rims....
the reason I speculate on the 600 is this.... somebody correct me if I'm wrong....
if they can release the same lens using many of the same elements, one optimized for the 645-d and one re-engineered for the k-5 they can share some of the developing costs between two market segments and appeal to nature photogs from both k-5 and 645d buyers...
and if it can focus fast... you maay see Pentax at sporting events again....
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 17/11/2010 - 23:22
Link
Personally I would like to see some WR primes @ f2, and a Tele converter. Pentax are you reading this! Seeing more Pentax cameras at any events would be great.
Fletcher8.
Posted 27/11/2010 - 22:29
Link
George Lazarette wrote:
Whatever next?
G
PS: Welcome to the forum. We're a little miffed that Jessops staff don't seem to know much about cameras any more, which perhaps explains their otherwise inexplicable decision to stop selling Pentax DSLRs. Let's hope you're the first of a new breed.
Thanks for the welcome!sthorogood wrote:
I have been taking photo's for the past week with my K-5 and am really pleased at the picture quality - I'm shooting at high ISO's I would never have dreamed of attempting with my last camera (Canon 500d). As I work in Jessops, I've had plenty of opportunity to try all the other contenders and am delighted that I switched systems. I just need to get hold of some good prime lenses to do justice to this camera....
You work for Jessops... and you're interested in photography?I have been taking photo's for the past week with my K-5 and am really pleased at the picture quality - I'm shooting at high ISO's I would never have dreamed of attempting with my last camera (Canon 500d). As I work in Jessops, I've had plenty of opportunity to try all the other contenders and am delighted that I switched systems. I just need to get hold of some good prime lenses to do justice to this camera....
Whatever next?
G
PS: Welcome to the forum. We're a little miffed that Jessops staff don't seem to know much about cameras any more, which perhaps explains their otherwise inexplicable decision to stop selling Pentax DSLRs. Let's hope you're the first of a new breed.
Luckily for Jessops I do know about camera's, so feel free to come into our Taunton Store for a chat! They have just started to offer Pentax SLR's on-line again - however I'd already bought my K-5 elsewhere as I decided it was the best camera available. Pentax being removed from the range was probably a commercial one - read the press from a year or so ago for the clues....
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


8880 posts
16 years
Lancashire
mounts for testing.
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi