Small Tortoiseshell Butterfly on Buddlia (backlit)
Posted 30/08/2016 - 12:00
Link
Thanks. I'm pretty sure mine really IS a small tortoiseshell. Any idea what the one in the Mail article is though?
John K
Posted 30/08/2016 - 12:02
Link
Except for the colors, their pic looks nothing like one; unless they are of some different variaty? Either way, this is the DM.... Nice capture
'Photography...it remembers little things, long after you have forgotten....' (Aaron Siskind)
Posted 30/08/2016 - 13:20
Link
Someone has commented on the Mail website that the photo they describe as a small tortoiseshell is in fact a plain tiger butterfly which are widespread in Asia and Africa, but not the UK. I'm not going mad after all!
John K
Posted 30/08/2016 - 13:23
Link
This is just an example of the quality of the Daily Mail - the image is DEFINITELY not of a small tortoise shell (or a large one either). I'm not sure what the butterfly in their article is, but it looks a bit like a Tiger Longwing - a tropical species, just shoddy journalism. Viscount Rothermere must be turning in his grave.
Phil
Phil
K-5iiS; K-r; ME Super; ME; DA* 16-50 f2.8; DA 18-135 WR; DA 55-300 WR; HD DA 15mm F4 ED AL Limited; FA 50mm f1.4; A50mm f1.7; DAL 18-55mm; M40mm f2.8; + assorted non-Pentax lenses
My Flikr Page link
My Flikr Page link
Posted 30/08/2016 - 14:58
Link
Isn't it disturbing how wrong the Mail is on a subject people do know about, ie what a small tortoiseshell looks like. Even more disturbing - all those subjects we don't know anything about but we read articles in the mail about. Are they all as wrong?
... just another middle-aged guy with a hobby. I have an extreme macro learning site at extreme-macro.co.uk - Pentax-centric, your feedback and comments would be appreciated!
Posted 30/08/2016 - 17:43
Link
I find it hard to believe the Mail could get that so wrong. The photo agency credited is Alamo; looking on that site they have plenty of photos of the real thing so I can't see that there's any excuse. Yes, one wonders if anything they publish can be trusted after that.
John K
Posted 30/08/2016 - 23:15
Link
It looks like a Monarch butterfly to me, from the USA. Put (e.g.) 'milkweed butterfly' in google and see what you think
The story is probably right, however as I have seen very few small tortoishells this year
The story is probably right, however as I have seen very few small tortoishells this year
Posted 30/08/2016 - 23:24
Link
davidwozhere wrote:
It looks like a Monarch butterfly to me, from the USA. Put (e.g.) 'milkweed butterfly' in google and see what you think
The story is probably right, however as I have seen very few small tortoishells this year
It's certainly similar, but not quite the same.It looks like a Monarch butterfly to me, from the USA. Put (e.g.) 'milkweed butterfly' in google and see what you think
The story is probably right, however as I have seen very few small tortoishells this year
Try this search for the plain tiger butterfly:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=plain+tiger+butterfly&client=firefox-b&biw=101...
Anyhow, at least some small tortoiseshells are around, but I agree not as many as usual.
That butterfly I photographed was amazingly around on the same flower head for several more hours after I took that!
John K
Posted 30/08/2016 - 23:31
Link
Yes - Quite right !
Posted 31/08/2016 - 13:29
Link
I saw my first small tortoiseshell of the year yesterday. Not many Red Admirals around this year either.
Everything Changes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/arleimages/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/arleimages/
Posted 31/08/2016 - 20:54
Link
Not seen an admiral this year at all. That one from yesterday has been around again today (given there's only one I presume its the same one.) It must be feeling quite lonely.
John K
Posted 01/09/2016 - 00:50
Link
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



4192 posts
16 years
Scarborough,
North Yorks.
.
Hadn't thought of using the DA*200 for this type of photograph before but it works just great for it.
Can anyone confirm I'm not going stupid as the Daily Mail has just published an article saying the small tortoiseshell population has crashed link but their photo looks nothing like a small tortoiseshell to me. So if that isn't a small tortoiseshell, what is it as I've not seen one of those before? I suspect it is an overseas variety. There is one comment confirming my thoughts that the Mail got it wrong - unbelievable!