Sigma 10-20 ... Which one?
Posted 09/07/2011 - 20:49
Link
Consensus is that the old 4-5.6 version is sharper at 10mm. I think there was a HSM variant of the old one although mine hasn't got it. The 3.5 version looks a bit softer at teh edges at 10mm but the distorion looks simpler, and you get an odd number of aperture blades, and more of them, which is nice if you like sunstars.
They're both very good but have a look at Lenstip's review of the 8-16. I'd be tempted by that one I think.
They're both very good but have a look at Lenstip's review of the 8-16. I'd be tempted by that one I think.
Posted 09/07/2011 - 21:01
Link
I have the 10-20 and it is very good at what it does IMO, my version is definately not HSM.
I have seen some very good shots from the 8-16 recently so that is worth consideration (but is more expensive I think) every extra millimetre at the wide end seems to make quite a difference.
I have seen some very good shots from the 8-16 recently so that is worth consideration (but is more expensive I think) every extra millimetre at the wide end seems to make quite a difference.
Posted 09/07/2011 - 21:02
Link
I should add mine is the 4-5.6
Posted 09/07/2011 - 21:04
Link
looking at the Flickr group pics from the 8-16, I feel dizzy.
I think I'll stick to my original decision on the 10-20
I think I'll stick to my original decision on the 10-20
Discovering the joys of photography with Pentax
Posted 09/07/2011 - 21:17
Link
Ok Sigma 10-20
f4-5.6, new £300
f3.5, used £350
decisions decisions
oh btw Panamoz selling f 3.5 for £400 (anyone used them before?)
f4-5.6, new £300
f3.5, used £350
decisions decisions
oh btw Panamoz selling f 3.5 for £400 (anyone used them before?)
Discovering the joys of photography with Pentax
Posted 09/07/2011 - 21:21
Link
Consider the Tamron too, was a really good lens on my Nikon and gives you a slightly more versatile 24mm on the tele side of things. Was a bit soft on the corners at 10mm though.
I am all torn between the 8-16 and the 10-24 ....
I am all torn between the 8-16 and the 10-24 ....
Posted 09/07/2011 - 21:32
Link
I have tried Panamoz, the item was out of stock though. Or they couldn't get stock at the price listed on their site. They're grey importers I think. I'd get a used f4-5.6 one - they come up regularly on the forum. You can then ask the seller for a sample pic so you know what you're getting.
Posted 11/07/2011 - 11:47
Link
had initially gone for the F3.5 but Mifsud probably mispriced it at £350. They have sent me an email saying oos and put the price up to £499.
Got mine from Cameraworld who has the F4-5.6 for £300 or so
Got mine from Cameraworld who has the F4-5.6 for £300 or so
Discovering the joys of photography with Pentax
Posted 11/07/2011 - 12:49
Link
Just ordered mine for 298 from Cameraworld though if anyone is interested they are extremely low in stock and can only be ordered online now.
Posted 12/07/2011 - 13:30
Link
Arrived this morning with Parcelforce
Discovering the joys of photography with Pentax
Posted 12/07/2011 - 20:38
Link
quote:3496ace15f="japers45"]I have the 10-20 and it is very good at what it does IMO, my version is definately not HSM.[/quote]There is so much DoF with this lens, even wide open, that it does not need much focusing!!
K-3 II, K-3 and a K-70 from SRS (having now relegated the K-30 /"K-50" to a backup body), & some Sigma and Pentax lenses (and a lot of old 35mm gear!)
Posted 12/07/2011 - 21:01
Link
jeallen01 wrote:
There is so much DoF with this lens, even wide open, that it does not need much focusing!!
Not if you focus close though so that your magnification is higher
There is so much DoF with this lens, even wide open, that it does not need much focusing!!
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



237 posts
15 years
In the sky
Also
Is the old one not HSM?