Sharpest, cheapest and fastest long zoom?
Posted 24/03/2010 - 12:52
Link
gartmore wrote:
As Bart Simpson is fond of saying "Cool your jets"
Remember this is a friendly forum and if such a lens as zelousdp asked about really did exist in such specific terms, members would have been falling over themselves to offer advice.
Ken, consider my jets cooled!
As Bart Simpson is fond of saying "Cool your jets"
Remember this is a friendly forum and if such a lens as zelousdp asked about really did exist in such specific terms, members would have been falling over themselves to offer advice.
If you can't say something nice about Pentax, you won't say anything at all.
Apparently.
Apparently.
Posted 24/03/2010 - 12:55
Link
Crikey...this thread has been an entertaining read.
Back onto subject however (if I may).
My 2p's worth would be to open the budget a little more - you can pick up the Tamron 70-300 for about £65 if you have the patience to look around.
In my opinion it trumps the DA 55-300 in terms of price vs performance. It's also quite quick at AF, which the 55-300 sadly is not at all.
The DAL version of the 55-300 is currently available at SRS for £159 which is a steal - but considering the OP's budget was circa £40; I'd say the Tamron offers the sharpest cheapest and fastest long zoom money can buy for Pentax. It's sharper and has better IQ than the 50-200; and is on a par with the 55-300 for IQ (with the exception of purple fringing - the Tammy is awful for that - but with a little PP it is'nt an issue).
Tammy 70-300 I'd say without a doubt.
Back onto subject however (if I may).
My 2p's worth would be to open the budget a little more - you can pick up the Tamron 70-300 for about £65 if you have the patience to look around.
In my opinion it trumps the DA 55-300 in terms of price vs performance. It's also quite quick at AF, which the 55-300 sadly is not at all.
The DAL version of the 55-300 is currently available at SRS for £159 which is a steal - but considering the OP's budget was circa £40; I'd say the Tamron offers the sharpest cheapest and fastest long zoom money can buy for Pentax. It's sharper and has better IQ than the 50-200; and is on a par with the 55-300 for IQ (with the exception of purple fringing - the Tammy is awful for that - but with a little PP it is'nt an issue).
Tammy 70-300 I'd say without a doubt.
Posted 24/03/2010 - 12:58
Link
Thanks Snootchies. Will look into that.
Posted 24/03/2010 - 13:26
Link
As I suggested the Pentax-M 75-150mm f4 as a lens that is cheap, sharp and fast(ish), it seems reasonable to offer a sample. I claim no artistic merit whatever for the following photo. It is one of many "holiday snaps" that I took in August last year. I vaguely recall taking it with the lens at 150mm (but I might be wrong).
This photo was taken from a headland at the northern side of Clachtoll beach in Sutherland.

This is a 100% crop ........

and so is this.

The lens was an Ebay purchase a year or two back. From memory, I think I paid £22.50 for it, so it definitely satisifies the "cheap" criterion Whether it satisfies the "sharp" and "fast" criteria is maybe not my call in this thread. I do know it (the lens) satisifies me and is a definite keeper.
Cheers
Andrew
This photo was taken from a headland at the northern side of Clachtoll beach in Sutherland.

This is a 100% crop ........

and so is this.

The lens was an Ebay purchase a year or two back. From memory, I think I paid £22.50 for it, so it definitely satisifies the "cheap" criterion Whether it satisfies the "sharp" and "fast" criteria is maybe not my call in this thread. I do know it (the lens) satisifies me and is a definite keeper.
Cheers
Andrew
Posted 24/03/2010 - 13:39
Link
Great suggestion Andrew - you can't argue with £22.50!!!!
Personally, 150mm would'nt be what I consider to be a long zoom - but it wins by a clear mile in terms of speed (can't fault F4) and price.
I dont have my gear handy - but would be curious to know what the Tammy offers in terms of max aperture at 150mm - I'd guess it would be around f4.5.
Personally, 150mm would'nt be what I consider to be a long zoom - but it wins by a clear mile in terms of speed (can't fault F4) and price.
I dont have my gear handy - but would be curious to know what the Tammy offers in terms of max aperture at 150mm - I'd guess it would be around f4.5.
Posted 24/03/2010 - 13:52
Link
Snootchies wrote:
it wins by a clear mile in terms of speed (can't fault F4) and price.
I only have one other lens with which I can compare it. It is definitely sharper than my Sigma 135mm f3.5 mini-tele prime (which is not a keeper!!). it wins by a clear mile in terms of speed (can't fault F4) and price.
Cheers
Andrew
Posted 24/03/2010 - 14:02
Link
Where's George when you need him?
Z-1p, K-1, P50
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
Posted 24/03/2010 - 14:33
Link
It would be nice to see 100% crops of photos. I don't think you can really tell anything about the resolution of a lens with a resize of the full frame.
Andrew
Andrew
Posted 24/03/2010 - 14:41
Link
Posted 24/03/2010 - 16:59
Link

One of my two favourite cheap/efficient lenses - the 28-300 Sigma Aspherical IF - used on the Pentax *istD hand held from the deck of the Condor ferry as we entered St.Peter Port Guernsey.My other favourite is the 70-300 FAJ.
Neither cost over £75 and both have served/are serving me well.
Tony
K20D,*istD ( now a dedicated M42 digital ),K100D,MZ5N,P50,ME Super,Spotmatic 1000,Spotmatic,ESII,ES,H2.18-55 II,18-55,75-300 FAJ,35-80 FA,80-200 F,28-105 FA,Sigma 24-70 AF Aspherical,Sigma 28-300 Hyperzoom , Praotor II 500 M42,Centon 500mm mirror,and a few Pentax M42 Taks,super-Taks,smc Taks,A and M lenses.Benbo trekker,7dayshop monopod and a Lowepro rucksack.
I am now on Flickr which is nice !
I am now on Flickr which is nice !
Posted 24/03/2010 - 17:09
Link
Bob, that first shot (in particular) is gorgeous.
If you can't say something nice about Pentax, you won't say anything at all.
Apparently.
Apparently.
Posted 24/03/2010 - 17:26
Link
K20D,*istD ( now a dedicated M42 digital ),K100D,MZ5N,P50,ME Super,Spotmatic 1000,Spotmatic,ESII,ES,H2.18-55 II,18-55,75-300 FAJ,35-80 FA,80-200 F,28-105 FA,Sigma 24-70 AF Aspherical,Sigma 28-300 Hyperzoom , Praotor II 500 M42,Centon 500mm mirror,and a few Pentax M42 Taks,super-Taks,smc Taks,A and M lenses.Benbo trekker,7dayshop monopod and a Lowepro rucksack.
I am now on Flickr which is nice !
I am now on Flickr which is nice !
Posted 24/03/2010 - 18:37
Link
Lovely shot of the forget-me-nots.
This is also with the Tammy whereas this was shot with my now sadly defunct SMC-M 200mm f/4.
K.
This is also with the Tammy whereas this was shot with my now sadly defunct SMC-M 200mm f/4.
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.









6724 posts
20 years
Glasgow,
Scotland
Remember this is a friendly forum and if such a lens as zelousdp asked about really did exist in such specific terms, members would have been falling over themselves to offer advice.
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -