SFXn
Posted 14/03/2007 - 23:05
Link
They are robust, capable, picture-taking machines, which work well in natural light. Much better made than any later camera before the K10D (and perhaps the MZ-S).
G
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 15/03/2007 - 13:34
Link
they look a bit plastic but as George says they are actually pretty solid. They sell so cheap mainly because they are quite large and ugly compared to most Pentax's and a lot of people don't know what they are/were.
A good choice as a starter SLR for someone on a budget. I had an SFX for a while and was always pleased with the results.
A good choice as a starter SLR for someone on a budget. I had an SFX for a while and was always pleased with the results.
Posted 15/03/2007 - 19:37
Link
I had a SFXn for a couple of years. It was my first autofocus camera and I really liked it. I seem to remenber that metering was restricted to centre-weighted. I thought that overall it was an excellent camera. I eventually traded it in for a MZ5.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


6724 posts
20 years
Glasgow,
Scotland
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -