Seven Deadly Sins

Oggy
Posted 07/10/2010 - 21:22 Link
If the ban photography, we grumble. If they don't, we grumble.

There's no pleasing some people.
Anvh
Posted 07/10/2010 - 21:24 Link
Gwyn wrote:
Just Google it Stefan, you'll see what we mean.
Already did I'm sure you can find something original
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
pnjmcc
Posted 08/10/2010 - 04:25 Link
gartmore wrote:
1. Dull content
I dont mind dull content as at least it shows an interest or an attempt to take a picture,

gartmore wrote:
2. HDR
Again I dont mind subtle HDR but I agree when its overdone

gartmore wrote:
3. Colour Popping
I like colour popping, I have seen some excellent pictures using this technique.

gartmore wrote:

4. Squint Horizons
Not too sure what you mean but if you mean not straight or level, I agree. its something I suffer from a bit and usually the first thing I correct in PS

gartmore wrote:
5. Blown Highlights
6. Cliched subject matter
Again i consider all these to show that someone is having a go and at least trying.

gartmore wrote:
7. Blaming poor technique on equipment
Totally agree

My 7, (all my own personal opinion of course.)

1) Badly focused images
2) Holiday snapshots of people in front of landmarks/scenery
3) Oversharpened images
4) Cheesey effects (in camera or PS)
5) Sepia on anything modern
6) 'Olan Mills' style portraits
7) PP when passed of as "Straight from camera"

Regards
PaulM
All cameras are equal but.....
Some are more equal than others
Dangermouse
Posted 08/10/2010 - 11:23 Link
I see the "Holiday snapshot of people in front of the subject" one all the time. I can't fathom why! It's a rugged, remote hillside with a lake - why do you think it'll be improved by a grinning human shoved in the frame? It's as if they're worried that people won't believe they've been to these places unless they put someone in the photo.

I am getting better at things like:

Making sure there are no ramblers in luminous orange raincoats in the shot (had one waddling along while staring at thin air with binoculars last week, took ages for them to move!)

Waiting for the passing car to move out of frame before pressing the button.

I realise foreground interest/any interest when dealing with an otherwise empty landscape can help, but to me that's something like managing to include your car or friends in the bottom corner of the shot, just to give the photo a bit of a story. They shouldn't dominate half the frame, and to me it's better if the viewer has to actively look for them as it shows the scale of the landscape.
Matt

Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Pwynnej
Posted 08/10/2010 - 11:36 Link
Anvh wrote:
Gwyn wrote:
Just Google it Stefan, you'll see what we mean.
Already did I'm sure you can find something original
I'm sure similar things can be said about Kinderdijk - I've done that in all weathers and all seasons (even had all seasons in one day:shock
Z-1p, K-1, P50
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
johnriley
Posted 08/10/2010 - 14:19 Link
Quote:
Holiday snapshots of people in front of landmarks/scenery
Don't underestimate these. A picture of a lake looks pretty much the same whatever era it is shot in (notwithstanding some superb lighting) but sit in a boat some Edwardian holidaymakers and you have something of lasting interest. Substitute a group of 21st Century holidaymakers and we have a boring image for now.

In 100 years maybe not so boring after all?
Best regards, John
Pentaxophile
Posted 08/10/2010 - 17:59 Link
johnriley wrote:
Quote:
Holiday snapshots of people in front of landmarks/scenery
Don't underestimate these. A picture of a lake looks pretty much the same whatever era it is shot in (notwithstanding some superb lighting) but sit in a boat some Edwardian holidaymakers and you have something of lasting interest. Substitute a group of 21st Century holidaymakers and we have a boring image for now.

In 100 years maybe not so boring after all?
Quite, and what's wrong with a nicely taken snap to remember a good time with a great friend or family member? Just turn the damn date stamp off!
gartmore
Posted 08/10/2010 - 18:38 Link
Gwyn wrote:
Nothing wrong with the castle - but I would be happy to see a photography ban around it .

Maybe we could move it to a Glasgow park?
No thanks!

What is amazing is that it isn't and ancient castle at all but mostly built in the early 20th century, the back wall which you cant see is plain concrete
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
fritzthedog
Posted 08/10/2010 - 19:02 Link
Just been looking at a few images of it - can not find one taken from under water
No matter how many lenses I have owned - I have always needed just one more
Oggy
Posted 08/10/2010 - 21:53 Link
Black and white (we have moved on ).

Pictures with only a small bit in focus (use a smaller aperture :roll.

Pictures of a very small part of an interesting object (EG one headlamp of an interesting car - get a wider lens :shock.

---

er - off to the tinmine a bit sharpness Oggy
dougf8
Posted 08/10/2010 - 21:56 Link
fritzthedog wrote:
Just been looking at a few images of it - can not find one taken from under water
It's in Scotland, the only crystal clear water there is used to dilute whiskey.
Lurking is shirking.!
Dangermouse
Posted 08/10/2010 - 22:55 Link
See, I think some things work well in black and white. Architecture and industrial stuff for instance, as the lack of colour brings out the shapes and textures.

I've never converted digital shots to B&W though - if I want B&W I use film, as the whole experience of using something like a KX, processing the film on the kitchen worktop, then scanning the negatives is great fun.
Matt

Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Smeggypants
Posted 09/10/2010 - 03:12 Link
johnriley wrote:
Quote:
Holiday snapshots of people in front of landmarks/scenery
Don't underestimate these. A picture of a lake looks pretty much the same whatever era it is shot in (notwithstanding some superb lighting) but sit in a boat some Edwardian holidaymakers and you have something of lasting interest. Substitute a group of 21st Century holidaymakers and we have a boring image for now.

In 100 years maybe not so boring after all?
Yes I agree. People and anything that conveys the view at a certain time in history is great. A victorian/Edwardian scene is certainly enhanced by the people and the vehicles and anything else from the era.

I don't like too posed pics though. Get the subjects being natural or doing something interesting.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Smeggypants
Posted 09/10/2010 - 03:14 Link
Oggy wrote:
Black and white (we have moved on ).

Pictures with only a small bit in focus (use a smaller aperture :roll.

Pictures of a very small part of an interesting object (EG one headlamp of an interesting car - get a wider lens :shock.

Disagree with all of those.

I love Black and white for some shots

I love a shallow depth of field for the right pic.

A pic of a small section of the Eiffel Tower showing just a few rusty rivets is far more interesting than the usual shot.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Smeggypants
Posted 09/10/2010 - 03:16 Link
pnjmcc wrote:


My 7, (all my own personal opinion of course.)

1) Badly focused images
Yup, I'm gutted to get a great shot and it's OOF.


Quote:

2) Holiday snapshots of people in front of landmarks/scenery
3) Oversharpened images
4) Cheesey effects (in camera or PS)
5) Sepia on anything modern
Yup.

Quote:

6) 'Olan Mills' style portraits
Comment Image
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Edited by Smeggypants: 09/10/2010 - 03:17

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo