Second hand lens advice
Posted 17/08/2007 - 11:02
Link
I've never owned any of the 35-80mm lenses so can't comment on those however I have used a couple of different Pentax AF 28-80mm lenses.
Currently I've got one of the SMC-FA 28-80mm F3.5-5.6 lenses as it came with as part of a kit I bought in order to get hold of a cheap SMC-FA 50mm F1.7. I've not used the lens much however I have taken a few shots with it - it's quite a light lens and fairly flimsy and optically I'd have classed it as adequate but uninspired. They are pretty cheap 2nd hand though, however I can't see any real reason for using one instead of the 18-55mm kit lens except for the slightly longer reach at the long end.
The other Pentax 28-80mm I've had was one of the SMC-FA 28-80mm F3.5-4.7 powerzoom lenses. It's also quite plasticy but seemed to be stronger built than the F3.5-5.6. Optically it wasn't a bad lens - I didn't own both at the same time however from what I recall it was better optically than the F3.5-5.6 lens, as well as being a faster at the long end.
If you can get hold of one and in decent conditions (there were problems with quite a few of them) then the SMC-FA 28-70mm F4 was considerably better optically than either of the above. A decent 28-200mm (e.g. Pentax's own one) will perform at least as well as them where there range overlaps plus adding significant additional reach.
Currently I've got one of the SMC-FA 28-80mm F3.5-5.6 lenses as it came with as part of a kit I bought in order to get hold of a cheap SMC-FA 50mm F1.7. I've not used the lens much however I have taken a few shots with it - it's quite a light lens and fairly flimsy and optically I'd have classed it as adequate but uninspired. They are pretty cheap 2nd hand though, however I can't see any real reason for using one instead of the 18-55mm kit lens except for the slightly longer reach at the long end.
The other Pentax 28-80mm I've had was one of the SMC-FA 28-80mm F3.5-4.7 powerzoom lenses. It's also quite plasticy but seemed to be stronger built than the F3.5-5.6. Optically it wasn't a bad lens - I didn't own both at the same time however from what I recall it was better optically than the F3.5-5.6 lens, as well as being a faster at the long end.
If you can get hold of one and in decent conditions (there were problems with quite a few of them) then the SMC-FA 28-70mm F4 was considerably better optically than either of the above. A decent 28-200mm (e.g. Pentax's own one) will perform at least as well as them where there range overlaps plus adding significant additional reach.
Posted 17/08/2007 - 12:16
Link
Thanks niblue,
Saw them second hand for around £15 each and thought they may have been worth it. Was looking for a lens to fill the gap between my 18-55 kit lens and 70-300 Sigma lens. Love the Sigma for candid portrait shots, but sometimes 70mm (105mm) just isn't wide enough. Hoping one of them would make a nice 'portrait' lens.
Saw them second hand for around £15 each and thought they may have been worth it. Was looking for a lens to fill the gap between my 18-55 kit lens and 70-300 Sigma lens. Love the Sigma for candid portrait shots, but sometimes 70mm (105mm) just isn't wide enough. Hoping one of them would make a nice 'portrait' lens.
Gareth
K100D, P30, Pentax 18-55, Pentax SMC 1:1.7 50, Vivitar 80-200, Vivitar 28mm, Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro - Vivitar 2800D flash - Pentax AF360FGZ flash
https://www.flickr.com/photos/18262727@N08/
K100D, P30, Pentax 18-55, Pentax SMC 1:1.7 50, Vivitar 80-200, Vivitar 28mm, Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro - Vivitar 2800D flash - Pentax AF360FGZ flash
https://www.flickr.com/photos/18262727@N08/
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


101 posts
19 years
Merseyside
PENTAX 28-80MM F3.5-5.6
PENTAX SMC-FA 35-80MM
Thanks
K100D, P30, Pentax 18-55, Pentax SMC 1:1.7 50, Vivitar 80-200, Vivitar 28mm, Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro - Vivitar 2800D flash - Pentax AF360FGZ flash
https://www.flickr.com/photos/18262727@N08/