Seabirds

DrOrloff
Posted 08/06/2011 - 12:16 Link
Here are some photos I took during last weekend's break. The trip was mainly for seascapes (under the guise of a family holiday) but the birdlife was too good an opportunity not to have a quick go at. I have enjoyed the few sessions I have attempted bird photography and it is an area which I want to spend some time on. So I would appreciate comments, particularly from keen bird photographers on these, and particularly criticism - it is nigh on impossible to offend me so if you think these are largely boring or over cliched then I'd like to know. Plus help with ID's would be appreciated. All with DA 55-300 and I've tried not to overcrop:

Little egret (I think and probably not a seabird but a bird in the sea). It just wouldn't let me get closer but I quite like the rockpool environment:

Comment Image


Another, it's a little soft and there's not enough room below the reflection but I like the pose:

Comment Image


This one is a bit sharper:

Comment Image


Shame about the bland background but I like the way this shows the aerodynamic design:

Comment Image


This one I do like. Herring or common gull, I can't tell:

Comment Image


Shaded head, but I like the juvenile markings:

Comment Image


I liked these little things, very tricky as they don't half shift:

Comment Image


Nice little compact grouping of gulls with black heads (black-headed gulls?):

Comment Image


One of them touching down:

Comment Image


ID please:

Comment Image


And again please:
Comment Image
Edited by DrOrloff: 08/06/2011 - 12:20
Blythman
Posted 08/06/2011 - 12:43 Link
Not great at ID's as I tend to take the pic and then search. The RSPB website is fairly good. I'd have a stab at a Sanderling link and then a couple of Turnstones.

A very nice set, maybe a few of the gulls are a bit central in the frame. I like to give them space to move into. You say there wasn't enough room for the reflection in #2, I still think its a super shot
Alan


PPG
Flickr
Edited by Blythman: 08/06/2011 - 12:43
Stuey
Posted 08/06/2011 - 19:32 Link
I have to agree with the Sanderling and Turnstone 'stab' - however, I am no expert

As for crtiticism I feel it would be a bit harsh given the 300mm focal length, distnace to the birds and strong sunlight in some of them I think you have done very well

Each time I think of a criticism of the photo's I want to give myself a slap for being a moaning git
K10D, K5 plus plenty of clueless enthusiasm.

My Flickr site link
thoughton
Posted 08/06/2011 - 20:00 Link
I don't know squat about birds but they look pretty damn good to me The second is fantastic! While I like a vignette probably more than most I think in 4 and 11 it might be a bit too prominent.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
davem
Posted 08/06/2011 - 21:23 Link
last one is turnstone

Nice set of difficult group of birds
Dave
fatspider
Posted 08/06/2011 - 22:53 Link
Definately Sanderlings and Turnstones, the one in flight between the gull shots is also a Sanderling, as for either Common or Herring gull I have no idea, its a chip nicker
My Names Alan, and I'm a lensaholic.
My PPG link
My Flckr link

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo