Rule of Six

Jonathan-Mac
Posted 31/12/2021 - 11:10 Link
Wow, very interesting.

Summary: there will be six different versions of the K-3 III:

jet black finish
a version with a modified shutter release button
a monochrome model
a gunmetal version
and an Astro model

I loved the look of the original K-3 prestige in gunmetal grey, if I ever get a K-3 III then I'd love it to be that. Not sure what modification they want to make to the shutter button...
Pentax hybrid user - Digital K3, film 645 and 35mm SLR and Pentax (&other) lenses adapted to Fuji X and Panasonic L digital
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses
Lubbyman
Posted 31/12/2021 - 12:09 Link
Jonathan-Mac wrote:
Not sure what modification they want to make to the shutter button...
On the left hand side for left handed people?

Steve
RobL
Posted 31/12/2021 - 15:36 Link
It really is frustrating that Ricoh are obsessed with special editions and developing niche versions of cameras with an already tiny market share. The news that an updated full frame is unlikely but there might be lower spec versions is also filling me with despair, they don’t need to change the prism as suggested but just bring in the autofocus improvements from the K3.III and increase the megapixel count to around 45. Surely those could be done without altering the body much but neither is on the agenda. Sadly if my K1 fails I will have to look elsewhere for replacement. How do we make our views known to the management at Pentax?
Jonathan-Mac
Posted 01/01/2022 - 10:31 Link
RobL wrote:
How do we make our views known to the management at Pentax?
With our wallets.

I like the special editions, some of them look good and I think they raise awareness of the brand.
Pentax hybrid user - Digital K3, film 645 and 35mm SLR and Pentax (&other) lenses adapted to Fuji X and Panasonic L digital
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses
Lubbyman
Posted 01/01/2022 - 10:55 Link
RobL wrote:
just bring in the autofocus improvements from the K3.III and increase the megapixel count to around 45. Surely those could be done without altering the body much
The body wouldn't need to be altered but the software would and the electronics hardware probably would. Is the current processsor and associated gubbins up to the job of dealing with the increased data from more pixels? Does the current sensor shift mechanism have the precision needed for a higher pixel density? etc. etc. etc. That's where most time and cost goes when developing a complicated bit of electronics, the box it's in is relatively cheap to develop.

Steve
pentaxian450
Posted 02/01/2022 - 23:08 Link
Lubbyman wrote:
RobL wrote:
just bring in the autofocus improvements from the K3.III and increase the megapixel count to around 45. Surely those could be done without altering the body much
The body wouldn't need to be altered but the software would and the electronics hardware probably would. Is the current processsor and associated gubbins up to the job of dealing with the increased data from more pixels? Does the current sensor shift mechanism have the precision needed for a higher pixel density? etc. etc. etc. That's where most time and cost goes when developing a complicated bit of electronics, the box it's in is relatively cheap to develop.

Steve
The buffer of the K-3 III would also need to be improved. As it is right now, it's nothing to write home about...
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo