Really really cheap ring light

Frogherder
Posted 14/03/2011 - 16:38 Link
You can't call it a ring flash and it doesn't look pretty but it works fine for close up work.

Pop into Poundland (gardening section) and get a 12 LED parasol light.
It takes 4 AA batteries which last for days.

Now that is cheapskate photography but I did see similar (with 12 green LEDs - why green?) at In Focus which cost a lot lot more

Bernard
thoughton
Posted 14/03/2011 - 18:25 Link
Don't they just clamp around the shaft of your parasol? Wouldn't the hole be too small for a lens?
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Frogherder
Posted 14/03/2011 - 19:28 Link
Yes they do but they snap open to fit around the shaft and in this state will fit around the 18-55mm lens on my K10D.
I accept it's crude but it does provide even lighting on beetles etc without startling them when a flas goes off
Smeggypants
Posted 14/03/2011 - 19:38 Link
Actaully now bright LEDs are available it would be petty simply to build your own from scratch with as many LEDs + Current limiting resistor, as you like.

You could tape them around the outer edge of a lens hood with gaffa tape
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Tyr
Posted 14/03/2011 - 20:01 Link
But they are still nowhere near as powerful as a xenon flash!

The AF160FC is very pricey though (4 LEDs + 2 xenon flash tubes).
Frogherder
Posted 14/03/2011 - 20:32 Link
I did look at building my own but 12 bright LEDs alone would cost more than I paid. I even thought of canabalising it and rebuilding as per Smeggypants but decided that a "C" shape was probably as good as an "O" and battery compartments were built in.
Smeggypants
Posted 14/03/2011 - 21:11 Link
Tyr wrote:
But they are still nowhere near as powerful as a xenon flash!

The AF160FC is very pricey though (4 LEDs + 2 xenon flash tubes).
but with a K-5 and god high ISO performance ???
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Don
Posted 14/03/2011 - 21:24 Link
should at least eliminate any low light front focus issues... lol!
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Unlocker
Posted 14/03/2011 - 22:24 Link
Smeggypants wrote:
Tyr wrote:
But they are still nowhere near as powerful as a xenon flash!

The AF160FC is very pricey though (4 LEDs + 2 xenon flash tubes).
but with a K-5 and god high ISO performance ???
Definately, makes you look all CSI !
dougf8
Posted 14/03/2011 - 22:37 Link
As suggested above, my experience in tinkering with electronics and LEDs is that the gadget probably already exist cheaper and better than you can buy the components and make it yourself. It wasn't always so.

Things I used to make and now you get cheaper and better.
LED bike lights, 12v to 18.5V laptop chargers, radios that fit in a matchbox, LED strobes, 12V to 18V nicad chargers, solar shunt regulator, SLA charger, 12v to 4.5 split rail battery replacement PSU, led shelf lights

Mostly they are now cheaper than the cost of components.
Also once you've built it, it looks home made and its at least twice as big as the bought one. And you never fully trust it to work.
Lurking is shirking.!
Edited by dougf8: 14/03/2011 - 22:37
Opethian
Posted 14/03/2011 - 22:42 Link
Frogherder wrote:
Yes they do but they snap open to fit around the shaft and in this state will fit around the 18-55mm lens on my K10D.
I accept it's crude but it does provide even lighting on beetles etc without startling them when a flas goes off
I am very curious as to how this looks like on your camera.
Frogherder
Posted 14/03/2011 - 23:28 Link
It looks "curious", crude even. I don't think beetles, frogs in my garden, or I, really care what it looks like as its not too likely to be seen in public.
I started the topic stating that it was really cheap and to be honest that's about all it has going for it, but it does provide a cold light which doesn't appear to frighten the subject.

Come to think of it Don has suggested another use- I'm also passionate about misericords but hate to disturb the ambiance with 'un-necessary' flashes simply to enable focusing in the darker areas. Might even get away with a long(er) exposure if I use this light rather than a flash

My apologies, the source is Poundworld
Tyr
Posted 15/03/2011 - 08:37 Link
Smeggypants wrote:
Tyr wrote:
But they are still nowhere near as powerful as a xenon flash!

The AF160FC is very pricey though (4 LEDs + 2 xenon flash tubes).
but with a K-5 and god high ISO performance ???
Yes, well the K10Ds don't have that

Got to wait to see if all the issues withe the K-5 are resolved otherwise I'll be waiting for the K-3.
bretti_kivi
Posted 15/03/2011 - 09:01 Link
... there are some numbers around relating to just how much light a flash puts out in terms of candelas and therefore lumens. It's an *awful lot*. I calculated I'd need 200 XP-Gs running at well over 4A each (work out the power requirement!) for 1/100s to get close to a GN63 flash.

There are several nice links out there, including one from Kodak talking about foot-candles and their relationshop to aperture sizes and another one from a guy who measured the output of an EF500 in terms of speed of output at different settings (1/2, 1/4 etc). I can't find the links right now, which is annoying, but I'll go have a look later when I have the urge.

Bottom line? normal LEDs aren't much use except for really, really close work and even then, the colours aren't the best.

Bret
my pics: link
my kit: K3, K5, K-01, DA 18-55, D-FA50 macro, Siggy 30/1.4, 100-300/f4, 70-200/2.8, Samsung 12-24/f4, Tamron 17-50, and lots of other bits.
Frogherder
Posted 15/03/2011 - 17:39 Link
I did a short test last night (in otherwise total darkness) using just the LEDs as illumination.
I set my camera to ISO400 & F8, both camera and LEDs at a distance of 1 metre from a surface

Against a dark surface (sapelle faced door) the shutter speed was 1sec
Against a light surface (magnolia painted wall) the shutter speed was 1/6sec

As expected the GN is abysmally low compared with even a low end flash

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo