QUACK!

I've been doing a lot of sifting through old images lately as I have to do a presentation at my Camera Club later this year, I've found that resizing images for digital projection really helps to rescue what I would otherwise have dumped.

Re-sizing to 1024 X 768 pixels at 72ppi hides an awful lot, expecially when the image is not as sharp as it should be, pity it doesnt hide over-exposure

Anyway I thought I would include this one in the show, do you think I'm Quackers?

[IMG]http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j168/impotentspider/IMGP1033.jpg[/IMG]

I've recently 'shot' a batch (flock?) of ducks, and resized them as well. I did mine to 800 wide though. You can always do an output sharpen after the resize / resample. Ignoring the blown-out cheek / neck area, the rest of the shot is good to look at. The water adds a lot to it.

I'm with i-Berg, include the quack by all means, it doesn't make you quackers

It looks a wee bit soft to me. Whether you are quackers to include it depends on the quality of the other shots you are going to be showing!

I like the exposure and reflections, but the image is too soft