Portrait lens
Posted 20/03/2013 - 08:43
Link
The answer is simple, anything will make a great portrait lens. Different focal lengths lend themselves to very different styles of portraiture so I would encourage experimentation.
The only particular characteristic I would look out for is a wide aperture, which allows for more experimentation still.
I think the 50mm f1.7 is as good a place to start as anywhere.
The only particular characteristic I would look out for is a wide aperture, which allows for more experimentation still.
I think the 50mm f1.7 is as good a place to start as anywhere.
Posted 20/03/2013 - 21:02
Link
If you are prepared to use a manual focus M42 lens then the Helios 58mm f/2 is a good low cost option !
An advantage is that it will FORCE experimentation with all the exposure and focus settings !!!
Peter
An advantage is that it will FORCE experimentation with all the exposure and focus settings !!!
Peter
Posted 20/03/2013 - 21:34
Link
PeterKR wrote:
If you are prepared to use a manual focus M42 lens then the Helios 58mm f/2 is a good low cost option !
An advantage is that it will FORCE experimentation with all the exposure and focus settings !!!
Peter
And to back that up I just found the following on the US Forum :-If you are prepared to use a manual focus M42 lens then the Helios 58mm f/2 is a good low cost option !
An advantage is that it will FORCE experimentation with all the exposure and focus settings !!!
Peter
"..the M42 Helios 44 M ... and that is the lens you should really get imo (that's a multicoated Zeiss Biotar). It's a 58/2.0 double Gauss design and one of THE portrait lenses on film and digital."
Nuff said !
Peter
Posted 21/03/2013 - 12:33
Link
philstaff wrote:
My freind has recently purchaced a K 100 D from from a forum member his main use for the camera will probably shooting portraits. I have given him a smc 1.7 50 mm lens however what would you consider for one starting out on digital photography.
Ian, you already gave him a fast 50. Job done. Good choice!My freind has recently purchaced a K 100 D from from a forum member his main use for the camera will probably shooting portraits. I have given him a smc 1.7 50 mm lens however what would you consider for one starting out on digital photography.
If he wants the best he can buy the FA77 down the line.
Posted 21/03/2013 - 14:13
Link
Thanks for all the help and feed back guys always a very helpful forum this one.
Ian
Ian
Posted 21/03/2013 - 14:17
Link
Just a thought when shhooting a portrait in studio say would you always consider a prime lens the best option moving the camera from point to point as against using a zoom ?.
Ian
Ian
Posted 21/03/2013 - 14:39
Link
philstaff wrote:
Just a thought when shhooting a portrait in studio say would you always consider a prime lens the best option moving the camera from point to point as against using a zoom ?.
Ian
I can't think of a single situation in which I would use a zoom. To me they are big, ugly, slow, and generally don't render how I want to see. But hey, different people shoot in different ways. Just a thought when shhooting a portrait in studio say would you always consider a prime lens the best option moving the camera from point to point as against using a zoom ?.
Ian
Moving your shooting position is not the same as changing focal length on a zoom. The first changes your perspective. The second changes your field of view. Different things. There is no such thing as "zoom with your feet".
I shot a session yesterday that we started with no idea how to frame things. I tried a Vivitar 24/2, FA43 Ltd, and FA77 Ltd. If I'd had more physical space I would have tried even longer focal lengths.
The process was a matter of getting the desired depth of field with the optimal field of view. We settled on the K50/1.2. Turned out that 50mm at f/1.4 was perfect.
The smallest aperture I tried was f/2.4. So I guess that would have ruled out any and all zoom lenses!
Posted 22/03/2013 - 00:30
Link
philstaff wrote:
Just a thought when shhooting a portrait in studio say would you always consider a prime lens the best option moving the camera from point to point as against using a zoom ?.
Ian
Working in the studio, I use primes almost exclusively. The zoom lenses are great when I'm out, because they can cope easily with the unexpected, but in the studio, where I can control everything, the primes can't be beaten.
Just a thought when shhooting a portrait in studio say would you always consider a prime lens the best option moving the camera from point to point as against using a zoom ?.
Ian
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
Posted 22/03/2013 - 10:46
Link
http://www.rockycameras.com/fast-25-35-35-70mm-pentax-k-fit-fast-zoom-macro-lens...
Came across this site recently is this the lens recomended earlier and also has any member used this shop.
Ian
Came across this site recently is this the lens recomended earlier and also has any member used this shop.
Ian
Posted 22/03/2013 - 12:53
Link
It's a Soligor - you can *just* read the name. I don't think it's anything special, judging from comments about it on the manual focus forums.
Andrew
Andrew
Posted 22/03/2013 - 13:56
Link
portrait lenses... in order frommost used to least used here are my fav's
16-45
50 1.4
100mm macro
35 2.4
85mm soft 2.2
16-45
50 1.4
100mm macro
35 2.4
85mm soft 2.2
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 22/03/2013 - 14:00
Link
andrewk wrote:
It's a Soligor - you can *just* read the name. I don't think it's anything special, judging from comments about it on the manual focus forums.
Andrew
Thanks Andrew your more observant tban I am I missed that completly.It's a Soligor - you can *just* read the name. I don't think it's anything special, judging from comments about it on the manual focus forums.
Andrew
Ian
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


3665 posts
18 years
Grimsby,
UK
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released