please pick one, 4 images, I'm not sure
This topic has a poll - login to enter
Posted 18/07/2010 - 12:34
Link
Number two for me more variety of col in this photo than the others and looks sharper.
ian
ian
Posted 18/07/2010 - 13:14
Link
Oh dear, I can't choose between 1 and 3 - will come back after lunch and see if my hunger is effecting my choice.
Jackie H
K7, K20D, istDS, Optio SV, ME
Most used glass
50mm f1.4, 60-250mm, 28-80mm,
Sigma 105mm 2.8 Macro & Bertha 50-500
K7, K20D, istDS, Optio SV, ME
Most used glass
50mm f1.4, 60-250mm, 28-80mm,
Sigma 105mm 2.8 Macro & Bertha 50-500
Posted 18/07/2010 - 16:13
Link
For me it had to be one of the chilli shots, and the colours in number 2 edge it for me. Wouldn't look out of place in a cookbook...
Regards
Regards
Posted 18/07/2010 - 16:31
Link
I wonder if the photos look better with the stem pointing up instead of down, with photo 2 & 3.
Posted 18/07/2010 - 17:41
Link
Looking like 2 then.
The cutting marks are a deliberate component. No 1. is messy as it crispy melted cheese.
Thanks all. I might re-shoot and try with slightly better light, outside, stems up and have a try with different backgrounds.
The cutting marks are a deliberate component. No 1. is messy as it crispy melted cheese.
Thanks all. I might re-shoot and try with slightly better light, outside, stems up and have a try with different backgrounds.
Lurking is shirking.!
Posted 18/07/2010 - 17:44
Link
One and four for me, Doug. Stefan's orientation suggestion has some merit, I think. I like the fine control of exposure: those highlights must have been hell to preserve.
Oh, I've just seen the camera you used...
Oh, I've just seen the camera you used...
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Posted 18/07/2010 - 17:54
Link
No 2 for me, I prefer the contrasting colours
Simon
Simon
My website http://www.landscapephotographyuk.com
My Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/landscapephotographyuk
Find me on Google+ link
My Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/landscapephotographyuk
Find me on Google+ link
Posted 18/07/2010 - 18:10
Link
bwlchmawr wrote:
One and four for me, Doug. Stefan's orientation suggestion has some merit, I think. I like the fine control of exposure: those highlights must have been hell to preserve.
Oh, I've just seen the camera you used...
Andrew, funny you should say that, I had the camera on a tripod over the subject and because of the dark background I was hunting for the grey card I picked up and never needed, till now. Kicked myself for selling the Sekonic, I never really needed till now. Couldn't find said grey card so used a blue cloth I guessed was about 18%. Then gave up on that and set it to M, and twiddled until what I saw in preview matched what was below me. Put 2/3 bracket on and I'll play with the RAW output later.
One and four for me, Doug. Stefan's orientation suggestion has some merit, I think. I like the fine control of exposure: those highlights must have been hell to preserve.
Oh, I've just seen the camera you used...
Lurking is shirking.!
Posted 18/07/2010 - 22:46
Link
2 here as well. 4 isn't bad either. I don't like 3, the reflections somehow make it look a bit out of focus even though it isn't. 1 is technically good, but the subject is a bit unappealing
Posted 18/07/2010 - 22:57
Link
Tim, thanks. you're right about 3, it is perfectly in focus but the angle of the surface is deceptive. I think some tinkering with that one is in order. I thought the black on black/grey might work but perhaps that one needs full on daylight rather than the incidental side light.
What's wrong with cheese? I know what you mean though. I'm looking at the monthly comp in the Guardian and this month its texture. Mmmmmm toasted cheese. ( my contri http://www.flickr.com/photos/dougstevenson/sets/72157624527072982/ )
In the end I bottled the chilli shot but I'll be doing these again with everyone's comments in mind.
Thanks
What's wrong with cheese? I know what you mean though. I'm looking at the monthly comp in the Guardian and this month its texture. Mmmmmm toasted cheese. ( my contri http://www.flickr.com/photos/dougstevenson/sets/72157624527072982/ )
In the end I bottled the chilli shot but I'll be doing these again with everyone's comments in mind.
Thanks
Lurking is shirking.!
Posted 19/07/2010 - 21:49
Link
I prefer #4 because of the strong colours: red, green, black. I'd replace the cuttingboard for something really black and maybe shiny so that the chillies'reflection is there as well and yes, have another look at the arrangement. Well, don't mind me - can't do any better than you.
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships. - Ansel Adams -
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



2917 posts
16 years
another place
1: cheese
[IMG]http://i740.photobucket.com/albums/xx49/df8/IMGP1762.jpg[/IMG]
2: mixed: bulgarian carrot, pinocchio's nose, hungarian black, cherry bomb, aji crystal
[IMG]http://i740.photobucket.com/albums/xx49/df8/IMGP1848.jpg[/IMG]
3: hungarian black
[IMG]http://i740.photobucket.com/albums/xx49/df8/IMGP1904.jpg[/IMG]
4: pinocchio's nose and cherry bomb
[IMG]http://i740.photobucket.com/albums/xx49/df8/IMGP1868.jpg[/IMG]