Visit MPB Visit MPB Visit MPB

photo copyright

reso
Posted 24/11/2017 - 23:22 Link
Hi all
a couple of my photos have been used in two local paper how do i put a copyright on to the photo
advice please
k5iis sigma 8-16 sigma 10_20 hsm tamron 17-50 pentax faj 18-35 pentax da 18-135 tokina 20-35 tokina 28-70 atx pro pentax dfa 100 wr
pentax da*50-135 pentax da*60-250 sigma af 400mm pentax 1.7 af adapter
Pentax af aw 1.4 rear converter and a flash
johnriley
Posted 25/11/2017 - 01:13 Link
You already own the copyright in your photos and don't need to do anything.

If the newspapers have used your images without permission, as they can't unpublish them ( a website could take them down) you might consider sending them an invoice.
Best regards, John
Kevriano
Posted 25/11/2017 - 07:09 Link
reso wrote:
Hi all
a couple of my photos have been used in two local paper how do i put a copyright on to the photo
advice please

What John said, but also, pretty much every camera has the ability to add copyright to the exif data. It just needs to be set up.
K3, K3 II, 100MM 2.8 Macro, Sigma 10-20 3.5, Sigma 17-50 2.8, Nikon D7500, Tamron 150 600 G2
RobL
Posted 25/11/2017 - 08:22 Link
Ditto in Lightroom and probably other PP software as well. That gives you the option to add copyright with your name to an online image or omit for prints.
JAK
Posted 25/11/2017 - 12:45 Link
reso hasn't suggested how the papers got hold of his photos. If from social media sites the exif often gets stripped so the copyright added that way gets lost. An indiscreet superimposed sig somewhere in the photo can help.
John K
Edited by JAK: 25/11/2017 - 12:46
Algernon
Posted 25/11/2017 - 15:46 Link
I'm quite sure that having the original plus other shots taken at the same place would be good enough to prove Copyright. There's bound to be a Freelance site that explains it.

--
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber

Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff

Algi
JAK
Posted 25/11/2017 - 18:55 Link
I now know what happened and Reso has confirmed it's OK for me to say here. Reso sent some of his car photos to the crews concerned and it was they who submitted the photos to the papers. So presumably the papers wouldn't have queried it.
Local papers don't normally pay much (if anything) for submitted photos these days so I wouldn't think it is worth making much of a fuss over.
Given Reso has provided the means for the crews to get some free publicity, if chased perhaps they might get him a free pass to an event and a private photo shoot. Might work out well all round with a closer inside link to the sport he likes. I hope so.
John K
razashaikh
Posted 06/12/2017 - 05:17 Link
I am using Add Text and Timestamp on Gallery Photos to add copyright stamps on my photographs. Works pretty well for me.
Edited by razashaikh: 06/12/2017 - 05:18
cabstar
Posted 09/12/2017 - 12:17 Link
These problems can be avoided by simply specifying what images can be used for when giving them away. And giving them away is the concern here if they’re given to a commercial organisation with no restrictions then they will be used how they want.

Local news pays very little for images. I had an image of a local shop on fire and finally settled on a fee of £25 and then had to remind them numerous times to pay me.

I now do a lot of PR work for companies that ends up in the papers where the company pays me for my time and licensing far more lucrative than sending to local newspapers and my work is still published in the local rag win win
PPG Wedding photography Flickr
Concert photography

Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
royd63uk
Posted 09/12/2017 - 14:05 Link
Cabstar time to lose that sig
Quote:
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released

regards
Roy

Pentax K3 gripped,and some lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pentaxroy/

my pbase gallery
cabstar
Posted 11/12/2017 - 01:18 Link
Yeah I should really change it to FF with a faster frame rate 😂
PPG Wedding photography Flickr
Concert photography

Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
pgweber
Posted 11/12/2017 - 10:46 Link
cabstar wrote:
Yeah I should really change it to FF with a faster frame rate 😂

...and fewer (24?) MP?
Peter

Pentax K5
Pentax DA 18-55 Mk1, 50-200 (Samsung), 16-45, 55-300 Mk1, 35 f/2.4
Pentax MZ6 + FA28-90, FA50 f/1.4, M 50 f/1.7
Tamron 80-210mm & 28mm
cabstar
Posted 12/12/2017 - 14:33 Link
Nah I’m used to 24megapixel 7fps now so wouldn’t settle for less than that now
PPG Wedding photography Flickr
Concert photography

Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
JAK
Posted 12/12/2017 - 15:07 Link
I'd have trouble recomposing the photo in the frame to take another one repeatedly in under half second intervals.
Surely a seconds worth of photos at 7fps means they must be almost all the same so does it matter how many it takes? If it's to capture a specific instance in an explosion or something video or dedicated hi-speed camera is the way to go.
John K
Edited by JAK: 12/12/2017 - 15:14

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.