Pentax Photo Gallery
Posted 10/04/2007 - 12:08
Link
Sounds interesting but it is yet another site which doesn't work in Opera, so I'm unable to view it.
Posted 10/04/2007 - 14:05
Link
I'm cureently looking into the Opera issues for my own site, but if you have such problems with it why not try Firefox 2?
Best regards, John
Posted 10/04/2007 - 14:14
Link
Quote:
I'm cureently looking into the Opera issues for my own site, but if you have such problems with it why not try Firefox 2?
For a number of reasons, not least the superb integrated email system, Opera-lovers don't want to switch just because some incompetent coders can't be bothered to write correct html.I'm cureently looking into the Opera issues for my own site, but if you have such problems with it why not try Firefox 2?
I'm not referring to you, John; I mean the people who wrote Dreamweaver to fit in with Microsoft's proprietary tags and poor implementation of html, rather than with standard html.
Fortunately, such problems are relatively rare.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 10/04/2007 - 14:44
Link
Interesting and curious how the format of all the K10D images has been reduced to the proportions of the '67' medium format model....
Posted 10/04/2007 - 15:15
Link
Gwyn - the site works perfectly well in Opera, once the Adobe Flash Player is installed.
Quote from the site: "This website is requires the Adobe Flash player version 8 or higher, and Javascript must be enabled."
George - given that Adobe Flash and JavaScript are, by now, both well-established Web technology, I don't think that's a good example of "incompetent coders (who) can't be bothered to write correct html."
Ray.
Quote from the site: "This website is requires the Adobe Flash player version 8 or higher, and Javascript must be enabled."
George - given that Adobe Flash and JavaScript are, by now, both well-established Web technology, I don't think that's a good example of "incompetent coders (who) can't be bothered to write correct html."
Ray.
Z1, K10D, D-BG2 Grip, DA 1:3.5-5.6 18-55mm AL, DA 1:3.5-6.3 18-250mm ED AL(IF), AF540FGZ Flash, FA 1:1.7 50mm, DA 1:2.4 70mm Limited, Wireless Remote (Did I offend you? Click here).
Posted 10/04/2007 - 19:01
Link
Quote:
George - given that Adobe Flash and JavaScript are, by now, both well-established Web technology, I don't think that's a good example of "incompetent coders (who) can't be bothered to write correct html."
Ray.
I was referring to JR's site. The Pentax gallery site certainly seems to work OK on my pc.George - given that Adobe Flash and JavaScript are, by now, both well-established Web technology, I don't think that's a good example of "incompetent coders (who) can't be bothered to write correct html."
Ray.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 10/04/2007 - 20:52
Link
I have Adobe Flash player version 8 and Javascript enabled and still see nothing more than a black screen with a Pentax photogallery logo in the corner. Nowhere does it tell me that I need to install anything. It just doesn't work.
I see no reason to change to Firefox, I've been using Opera since the dawn of time. On the whole I am extremely happy with Opera. I have no intention of switching browsers just to view a web site. If it doesn't work then tough, I don't get to see it, and I certainly don't intend to use IE to view it.
I see no reason to change to Firefox, I've been using Opera since the dawn of time. On the whole I am extremely happy with Opera. I have no intention of switching browsers just to view a web site. If it doesn't work then tough, I don't get to see it, and I certainly don't intend to use IE to view it.
Posted 10/04/2007 - 21:01
Link
Gwyn - The words "PHOTO GALLERY" are underlined with an orange line. The words "LOADING INTERFACE" may just be visible (they're in a very dark shade of grey).
If you wait a bit (quite a bit - around 45 seconds ), the orange underline should "re-start" as a progress bar when the Flash objects load. Then you should get the gallery in full, at least, that has been my experience using Opera.
Ray.
If you wait a bit (quite a bit - around 45 seconds ), the orange underline should "re-start" as a progress bar when the Flash objects load. Then you should get the gallery in full, at least, that has been my experience using Opera.
Ray.
Z1, K10D, D-BG2 Grip, DA 1:3.5-5.6 18-55mm AL, DA 1:3.5-6.3 18-250mm ED AL(IF), AF540FGZ Flash, FA 1:1.7 50mm, DA 1:2.4 70mm Limited, Wireless Remote (Did I offend you? Click here).
Posted 10/04/2007 - 22:10
Link
It seems that Opera is written in a way that means it ignores the instruction to keep the tables to the left.
A friend has written some code for me that is expected to cure this problem and I will hopefully become Opera-friendly in the near future.
I wouldn't want to exclude anyone!
A friend has written some code for me that is expected to cure this problem and I will hopefully become Opera-friendly in the near future.
I wouldn't want to exclude anyone!
Best regards, John
Posted 10/04/2007 - 22:27
Link
Quote:
It seems that Opera is written in a way that means it ignores the instruction to keep the tables to the left.
Opera is not perfect, but often, when it doesn't work, it is because it is obeying the rules, whilst IE is not, and sadly, people tend to write for IE. Some other browsers dekiberately break rules in order to be compatible with IE.It seems that Opera is written in a way that means it ignores the instruction to keep the tables to the left.
It would be interesting to see what is the truth in this case.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 10/04/2007 - 23:13
Link
This strikes me as another one of those topics that would provoke outrage were it about camera equipment.
What does it matter which browser you use? What is the religious attachment to any particular one?
I use Firefox and IE, depending on my requirements. If a really cool website that I really liked only worked with Opera, I'd download it and install it, just like if there was a feature of one package that I really needed that wasn't in my usual one, I'd get it if I could afford it.
It's not even like you have to pay for either. Why not just have both, and use either according to expediency?
Depriving yourself of something that might be really good, just because it doesn't work with one thing you'd like to use more, seems a bit daft if it costs nothing.
A bit like not buying the K10D because it doesn't work properly with M-series lenses.
PS Please don't bother working your way through all the analogies and comparisons here. I know they're all rather inexact. Trust me, your life is too short, just as mine is to argue this more rigorously.
What does it matter which browser you use? What is the religious attachment to any particular one?
I use Firefox and IE, depending on my requirements. If a really cool website that I really liked only worked with Opera, I'd download it and install it, just like if there was a feature of one package that I really needed that wasn't in my usual one, I'd get it if I could afford it.
It's not even like you have to pay for either. Why not just have both, and use either according to expediency?
Depriving yourself of something that might be really good, just because it doesn't work with one thing you'd like to use more, seems a bit daft if it costs nothing.
A bit like not buying the K10D because it doesn't work properly with M-series lenses.
PS Please don't bother working your way through all the analogies and comparisons here. I know they're all rather inexact. Trust me, your life is too short, just as mine is to argue this more rigorously.
Posted 11/04/2007 - 11:34
Link
Quote:
This strikes me as another one of those topics that would provoke outrage were it about camera equipment.
What does it matter which browser you use? What is the religious attachment to any particular one?
I use Firefox and IE, depending on my requirements. If a really cool website that I really liked only worked with Opera, I'd download it and install it, just like if there was a feature of one package that I really needed that wasn't in my usual one, I'd get it if I could afford it.
It's not even like you have to pay for either. Why not just have both, and use either according to expediency?
Depriving yourself of something that might be really good, just because it doesn't work with one thing you'd like to use more, seems a bit daft if it costs nothing.
A bit like not buying the K10D because it doesn't work properly with M-series lenses.
PS Please don't bother working your way through all the analogies and comparisons here. I know they're all rather inexact. Trust me, your life is too short, just as mine is to argue this more rigorously.
It matters for me because I find that Opera's integrated email system is streets ahead of any other. I do have IE available for when I really have to have it, but it's a pain to have to switch from one to another when websites SHOULD be written in standard HTML that all browsers can use.This strikes me as another one of those topics that would provoke outrage were it about camera equipment.
What does it matter which browser you use? What is the religious attachment to any particular one?
I use Firefox and IE, depending on my requirements. If a really cool website that I really liked only worked with Opera, I'd download it and install it, just like if there was a feature of one package that I really needed that wasn't in my usual one, I'd get it if I could afford it.
It's not even like you have to pay for either. Why not just have both, and use either according to expediency?
Depriving yourself of something that might be really good, just because it doesn't work with one thing you'd like to use more, seems a bit daft if it costs nothing.
A bit like not buying the K10D because it doesn't work properly with M-series lenses.
PS Please don't bother working your way through all the analogies and comparisons here. I know they're all rather inexact. Trust me, your life is too short, just as mine is to argue this more rigorously.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 11/04/2007 - 12:06
Link
Quote:
It matters for me because I find that Opera's integrated email system is streets ahead of any other. I do have IE available for when I really have to have it, but it's a pain to have to switch from one to another when websites SHOULD be written in standard HTML that all browsers can use.
Agreed. It was just the view below that struck me as a bit extreme.It matters for me because I find that Opera's integrated email system is streets ahead of any other. I do have IE available for when I really have to have it, but it's a pain to have to switch from one to another when websites SHOULD be written in standard HTML that all browsers can use.
Quote:
I have no intention of switching browsers just to view a web site. If it doesn't work then tough, I don't get to see it, and I certainly don't intend to use IE to view it.
Shame to miss something good for the sake of occasionally having to use a different browser.
I have no intention of switching browsers just to view a web site. If it doesn't work then tough, I don't get to see it, and I certainly don't intend to use IE to view it.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1469 posts
22 years
Rostock,
Germany
It's in beta state currently but you can submit shots and 'they' choose some for the gallery. Have a look at
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/index-flash.jsp
If you want to take part, send an email to photogallery at pentax dot com stating your interest. They then will send you an invite.
First round I submitted 8 pictures and got 3 in.
Prieni