pentax k10 samsung gx 10
Posted 15/06/2008 - 21:43
Link
I didn't realise that PEF files are compressed DNG files - I assume this is a lossless compression like WINZIP?
At that sort of money I am very tempted by a GX10 - I think I am finding the 6 megapixels in the K100 a bit frustrating now.
I must see what I'd get for a year old K100D.
Mike
At that sort of money I am very tempted by a GX10 - I think I am finding the 6 megapixels in the K100 a bit frustrating now.
I must see what I'd get for a year old K100D.
Mike
Posted 15/06/2008 - 23:02
Link
Quote:
simon
If both systems are saying there is space for 120 images on a card, then either the camera is stopping you at 120 PEFs, even though there is space on the card for more; or you are only going to be able to take say 80 DNGs before the card is full (not 120 as stated); or, as Tyr says (and I assume he is right), the camera allows you to shoot 180 PEFs despite saying you are only permitted 120.George Lazarette wrote:
G
Sorry George not sure what you mean , looks correct to me, only spare space is 0.2mb which wouldn't be enough for another shot ?Quote:
They're 16.1 MB in size, doing the maths this looks spot-on....
4GB card shows 3878mb in the "format" menu..
3878 / 16.1 = 240.8 (241 rounded up)
If the K10D is showing 242 & definitely compresses the .PEF then it sounds like it must use the .DNG file size to calculate available card space/shots ?
simon
That suggests that it tells you the card is full when it is not. Hmm.George Lazarette wrote:
I have to say that I am a little discombobulated by Simon's figures. They suggest that the Samsung camera IS compressing DNGs, whilst the Pentax we know does not.
Just to confirm, Simon, what is the size of a typical DNG on your GX10?
G
George,I have to say that I am a little discombobulated by Simon's figures. They suggest that the Samsung camera IS compressing DNGs, whilst the Pentax we know does not.
Just to confirm, Simon, what is the size of a typical DNG on your GX10?
G
They're 16.1 MB in size, doing the maths this looks spot-on....
4GB card shows 3878mb in the "format" menu..
3878 / 16.1 = 240.8 (241 rounded up)
If the K10D is showing 242 & definitely compresses the .PEF then it sounds like it must use the .DNG file size to calculate available card space/shots ?
simon
G
simon
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 15/06/2008 - 23:17
Link
Quote:
I didn't realise that PEF files are compressed DNG files - I assume this is a lossless compression like WINZIP?
PEFs are compressed, but they're not compressed DNGs. It's a different format. They both contain the same RAW data, and PEFs are compressed losslessly.I didn't realise that PEF files are compressed DNG files - I assume this is a lossless compression like WINZIP?
You could compress DNGs with software on your PC, but that would take up more time, and might not compress so tightly.
~Pete
Posted 16/06/2008 - 00:25
Link
Quote:
I didn't realise that PEF files are compressed DNG files - I assume this is a lossless compression like WINZIP?
At that sort of money I am very tempted by a GX10 - I think I am finding the 6 megapixels in the K100 a bit frustrating now.
I must see what I'd get for a year old K100D.
Mike
If you are the sort of person who goes out once or twice a week and takes 50 shots each time, then there is nothing wrong with a GX10.I didn't realise that PEF files are compressed DNG files - I assume this is a lossless compression like WINZIP?
At that sort of money I am very tempted by a GX10 - I think I am finding the 6 megapixels in the K100 a bit frustrating now.
I must see what I'd get for a year old K100D.
Mike
If you are a studio photographer, shooting 200 pictures an hour, then the Pentax is the only sensible choice.
Which are you closer to?
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 16/06/2008 - 06:58
Link
Once or twice a week so the GX10 sounds fine to me.
Not sure I folow the logic though as I thought the cameras were all but identical and made in same factory?
Mike
Not sure I folow the logic though as I thought the cameras were all but identical and made in same factory?
Mike
Posted 16/06/2008 - 07:46
Link
Quote:
Once or twice a week so the GX10 sounds fine to me.
Not sure I folow the logic though as I thought the cameras were all but identical and made in same factory?
Mike
You need to read the thread! The cameras are pretty much identical except that one produces bigger files than the other. If you take lots of pictures, those bigger files will cost you money and time.Once or twice a week so the GX10 sounds fine to me.
Not sure I folow the logic though as I thought the cameras were all but identical and made in same factory?
Mike
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 16/06/2008 - 07:50
Link
You're right I should read more carefully and get a better memory too.
I consider almost all storage to be dirt cheap now so file size is immaterial to me but I take your point.
Mike
I consider almost all storage to be dirt cheap now so file size is immaterial to me but I take your point.
Mike
Posted 16/06/2008 - 07:54
Link
Quote:
You're right I should read more carefully and get a better memory too.
I consider almost all storage to be dirt cheap now so file size is immaterial to me but I take your point.
Mike
I agree memory is pretty cheap, but the time factor is still an issue if you shoot a lot.You're right I should read more carefully and get a better memory too.
I consider almost all storage to be dirt cheap now so file size is immaterial to me but I take your point.
Mike
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 16/06/2008 - 10:17
Link
Quote:
I didn't realise that PEF files are compressed DNG files - I assume this is a lossless compression like WINZIP?
At that sort of money I am very tempted by a GX10 - I think I am finding the 6 megapixels in the K100 a bit frustrating now.
I must see what I'd get for a year old K100D.
Mike
Im a bit suprised at your comment re the K100 D I have had some lovely shots from the model I have. What frustrates you about the camera. If and when I do step up Im keeping mine as a back up.
I didn't realise that PEF files are compressed DNG files - I assume this is a lossless compression like WINZIP?
At that sort of money I am very tempted by a GX10 - I think I am finding the 6 megapixels in the K100 a bit frustrating now.
I must see what I'd get for a year old K100D.
Mike
Posted 16/06/2008 - 11:04
Link
I am becoming seduced by pixels - lots of them!
Mike
Mike
Posted 16/06/2008 - 11:26
Link
Quote:
I am becoming seduced by pixels - lots of them!
Mike
Have you been happy with the camera Mike I did have a problem with mine with vertical and horozontal planes not being plumb and they replaced the camera. Other than that as far as I can see image quality is great but Im no David Bailey LOL.
I am becoming seduced by pixels - lots of them!
Mike
Posted 16/06/2008 - 12:06
Link
Quite happy - I'm not certain things are plumb but I am rarely plumb anyway so it's not an issue. Simply more pixels and more control.
Mike
Mike
Posted 16/06/2008 - 12:30
Link
Quote:
Quite happy - I'm not certain things are plumb but I am rarely plumb anyway so it's not an issue. Simply more pixels and more control.
Mike
Hope you get what your looking for, I think the offer ends on the samsung in July so keep this in mind good luck.
Quite happy - I'm not certain things are plumb but I am rarely plumb anyway so it's not an issue. Simply more pixels and more control.
Mike
Posted 16/06/2008 - 14:47
Link
I really don't see the problem here. If time and storage space are such an issue, then buy a camera based on time-to-write and file size. But who would? For most people these are not big issues today.
The GX20 can write DNGs (23MB) quicker than the K20D can write PEFs (16MB) - compression seems to slow the K20D down. Memory is dirt cheap - eg a Transcend 8GB class 6 SDHC costs £15ish and it does 19MB/s write and 12MB/s read. A few years ago, we paid huge amounts of money for such a card... DVD writers and DVDs are dirt cheap.
Shooting DNG is no issue. Who sits around whilst the files are downloaded? Dual and Quad CPUs mean no problem to get on with processing whilst they download from a fast USB 2.0 reader. Having processed them (which takes no longer than for compressed, but don't they have to be uncompressed - a terrible time waste, they can be batched saved in compressed DNG via Lightroom or Photoshop or compressed via Adobe's DNG free program - so as to save on DVD space.
Between the two Samsung and Pentax since they are basically the same camera in a slightly different shell, I'd buy based on price and availability. And that is what I did. I got a Samsung GX20 + kit lens for a very good price.
The GX20 can write DNGs (23MB) quicker than the K20D can write PEFs (16MB) - compression seems to slow the K20D down. Memory is dirt cheap - eg a Transcend 8GB class 6 SDHC costs £15ish and it does 19MB/s write and 12MB/s read. A few years ago, we paid huge amounts of money for such a card... DVD writers and DVDs are dirt cheap.
Shooting DNG is no issue. Who sits around whilst the files are downloaded? Dual and Quad CPUs mean no problem to get on with processing whilst they download from a fast USB 2.0 reader. Having processed them (which takes no longer than for compressed, but don't they have to be uncompressed - a terrible time waste, they can be batched saved in compressed DNG via Lightroom or Photoshop or compressed via Adobe's DNG free program - so as to save on DVD space.
Between the two Samsung and Pentax since they are basically the same camera in a slightly different shell, I'd buy based on price and availability. And that is what I did. I got a Samsung GX20 + kit lens for a very good price.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


190 posts
18 years
North Essex
Duncan