Pentax DFA 150-450 + DA1.4x Combination
Posted 21/10/2015 - 17:27
Link
They're not bad in terms of sharpness, but IMHO the shutter speeds you are using are far too low. It's not so much a matter of camera movement as subject movement and this is taking the edge off the sharpness.
I would be looking at a shutter speed of at least 1/1000sec if at all possible.
I would be looking at a shutter speed of at least 1/1000sec if at all possible.
Best regards, John
Posted 21/10/2015 - 18:23
Link
Lovely set Barrie, bet your a happy chap today!
The run out last week was worth it.
Sorry I could not make it today.
The run out last week was worth it.
Sorry I could not make it today.
Regards, Tom
K-1ii,K-3iii's.
SMC PENTAX-F 1:2.8 28mm, HD Pentax-D FA* 1:1.4 50mm SDM AW,
SMC PENTAX-D FA MACRO 1:2.8 100mm WR,
SMC PENTAX-DA* 1:4 300mm ED [IF] SDM,
SMC PENTAX-FA* 1:4 600mm IF & ED,
HD PENTAX -DA 1.4x AW AF REAR CONVERTER,
Pentax Photo Gallery
K-1ii,K-3iii's.
SMC PENTAX-F 1:2.8 28mm, HD Pentax-D FA* 1:1.4 50mm SDM AW,
SMC PENTAX-D FA MACRO 1:2.8 100mm WR,
SMC PENTAX-DA* 1:4 300mm ED [IF] SDM,
SMC PENTAX-FA* 1:4 600mm IF & ED,
HD PENTAX -DA 1.4x AW AF REAR CONVERTER,
Pentax Photo Gallery
Posted 22/10/2015 - 09:13
Link
Thanks for the comments.
You are correct John, fast shutter speeds do help freeze these small birds, but I don't think the light in this instance would have allowed me any where near 1/1000 shutter speeds. The lens was wide open and the ISO ranged from 500 to 3200
You are correct John, fast shutter speeds do help freeze these small birds, but I don't think the light in this instance would have allowed me any where near 1/1000 shutter speeds. The lens was wide open and the ISO ranged from 500 to 3200
Barrie - Too Old To Die Young
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Posted 22/10/2015 - 09:39
Link
These are very good but how do they compare with closer cropping without the 1.4x teleconverter?
Posted 22/10/2015 - 10:06
Link
RobL wrote:
These are very good but how do they compare with closer cropping without the 1.4x teleconverter?
It's hard to say because of differing distances to the subject.These are very good but how do they compare with closer cropping without the 1.4x teleconverter?
Here is the lens on it's own, original and cropped.


Then at 450 & 630, but no cropping. I think the feeder and the branch were around the same area.


Barrie - Too Old To Die Young
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Posted 22/10/2015 - 13:27
Link
Thanks Barrie, you are very fortunate with the birdlife you get! It's just that I took two pics of a wagtail recently, one with a 100mm macro which happened to be on the camera, and a 55-300mm at 300mm. Zooming in on the back of the camera so the bird looked the same size the 100mm version looked sharper, probably because I hadn't adjusted the exposure setting. I guess if the light is good and you can get a steady grip the 1.4x is worthwhile.
Posted 27/10/2015 - 09:43
Link
I hadn't adjusted the exposure setting. I guess if the light is good and you can
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


6913 posts
17 years
Co. Durham UK
To me it's certainly better than when I tried the converter with the Sigma 150-500.
I'd like to know what other people think, in case I'm just getting carried away!!
All taken in TAv mode, spot metering, -0.7EV, either hand held or bean bag rest.
1/200 f8 ISO1000 630mm & cropped
1/320 f8 ISO1600 630mm
1/160 f8 ISO640 630mm
1/160 f9 ISO1250 630mm
1/160 f9 ISO 2000 532mm
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/