OOOPS!

Father Ted
Posted 10/08/2010 - 14:52 Link
fatspider wrote:
Quote:
my pet hate. Cyclists on the pavement
But can you blame them Ted with lorry drivers like that around
Fair point Guv
Getting there! Thanks to you guys

Pentax K3ii, Pentax K10d, Kit lens ( 18-55mm ), 50mm f1.7 lens, Tamron 70-300mm lens, Prinzflex 70-162 manual lens, Various old flashes.
Edited by Father Ted: 10/08/2010 - 14:52
polchraine
Posted 10/08/2010 - 14:58 Link
Gwyn wrote:
I think the number plate is there - between the two reflective strips. It is just so filthy you can't read it, but it is hard to tell from the size of the photo.
Holder maybe - but no plate.
.
K20D, *istD, MZ-S, Super-A, ME Super, MX
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, DA* 300,
DA 50-200, FA 24-90, FA 20-35,
M 400-600, A 50 f1.4, A 28 f2.8, A 70-210, M 35-80, M 50 f1.7
A x2S teleconverter and a few others ...
Father Ted
Posted 10/08/2010 - 15:01 Link
polchraine wrote:
Gwyn wrote:
Just because it's a local company doesn't mean it is a local lorry or driver. Plenty of freight companies outsource their lorries and drivers - cheaper in Lithuania innit?
That is one reason I asked about number plate. The tractor unit could be from anywhere - but a registration/number plate corresponding to the one on the tractor must be displayed at the rear.
That's a good point. Hadn't thought of that.
Getting there! Thanks to you guys

Pentax K3ii, Pentax K10d, Kit lens ( 18-55mm ), 50mm f1.7 lens, Tamron 70-300mm lens, Prinzflex 70-162 manual lens, Various old flashes.
Gwyn
Posted 10/08/2010 - 15:30 Link
polchraine wrote:
Gwyn wrote:
I think the number plate is there - between the two reflective strips. It is just so filthy you can't read it, but it is hard to tell from the size of the photo.
Holder maybe - but no plate.
Snootchies! Was there a number plate??? Did it fall off?

The driver is in so much yoghurt anyway that it's just another thing to add to the list.
Edited by Gwyn: 10/08/2010 - 15:30
Pwynnej
Posted 10/08/2010 - 15:40 Link
Father Ted wrote:
Oops indeed.
Network Rail might like a copy of that shot.

ANd my pet hate. Cyclists on the pavement,
Wearing iPoDs These gits think they're immune
Z-1p, K-1, P50
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
dougf8
Posted 10/08/2010 - 15:52 Link
I agree with the Ipod = death for cyclists. Still its the cars that kill them. He doesn't care though, no helmet. Doesn't bother him if he has to scrape his head down the tarmac to avoid a car (experience).
Lurking is shirking.!
Snootchies
Posted 10/08/2010 - 16:14 Link
I don't think there was a number plate, no.
Bob

My website (Hadfield Photography)

Pentax Gallery Artist page:link

Flickr Photostream: link
Dangermouse
Posted 10/08/2010 - 17:59 Link
Definitely send it to Network Rail, they're getting seriously fed up with having to deal with stuff like this and photo evidence will stop insurers from attempting to duck the bill.
Matt

Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
gartmore
Posted 10/08/2010 - 18:01 Link
There is a bridge in Glasgow which is hit constantly, tragically there were several deaths when a bus carrying Girl Guides ploughed into it.

It is well signposted BUT there is another identical lower bridge a short distance behind it creating an optical illusion that the first bridge is much higher than it actually is.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
ISO
Posted 10/08/2010 - 18:39 Link
Any idea if the Driver did a runner?
Oggy
Posted 10/08/2010 - 19:11 Link
It's a bridge delivery lorry. What's the problem?
Snootchies
Posted 10/08/2010 - 22:22 Link
No the driver did'nt do a runner.

Just out of view to the left is a pub being done up - full of scafolding (being turned into a Weatherspoons I believe) which had quite a number of builders on it. They all broke into laughter for about 30 seconds, but then one of them grabbed some spare traffic cones they had and cordoned off some of the road.

The driver looked a right picture - should have grabbed a shot of him!!!!
Bob

My website (Hadfield Photography)

Pentax Gallery Artist page:link

Flickr Photostream: link
MrCynical
Posted 10/08/2010 - 23:29 Link
dougf8 wrote:
Father Ted wrote:
ANd my pet hate. Cyclists on the pavement,
Nothing wrong with cyclists on pavements, ignorant pedestrians however who fail to spot the cycle path signs
Riding a bike on the pavement is illegal. Not sure whether walking on a cycle path is.

polchraine wrote:
That is one reason I asked about number plate. The tractor unit could be from anywhere - but a registration/number plate corresponding to the one on the tractor must be displayed at the rear.
Not pretending to be an expert on lorry anatomy, but perhaps it might have been on the bit obscured by the bent 'walls'?
Edited by MrCynical: 10/08/2010 - 23:34
dougf8
Posted 11/08/2010 - 00:13 Link
The blue signs with a cycle on mean its very, very legal.
Lurking is shirking.!
MrCynical
Posted 11/08/2010 - 01:10 Link
dougf8 wrote:
The blue signs with a cycle on mean its very, very legal.
Might be my eyes/lack of attention, but I can't see any in the OP's photo. You're correct of course that cycling on pavements where signs permit cycling on pavements is not illegal...

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo