One size fits all

tyronet2000
Posted 09/11/2013 - 16:36 Link
I'm getting to the stage where I no longer want to cart a bag of lenses etc about unless the car is parked within easy walking distance. So a question about the 18-250mm (any brand) and the pentax 18-270mm. I've read 18-250mm is not great at the long end and neither is the 18-270mm (Pentax) but does the 270mm give better performance at 250mm and is therefore a more logical albeit more expensive choice.
Regards
Stan

PPG
johnriley
Posted 09/11/2013 - 16:45 - Helpful Comment Link
Hi Stan

The 18-250 and 18-270 are sharp enough at all lengths, although admittedly on paper the longer we go the weaker the performance is. That's pretty normal with this type of lens. In practice the full focal range is usable.

I suspect the problem is that at longer lengths the aperture is quite small, so camera shake is more likely unless we keep a very sharp eye on shutter speed. Also at small apertures the AF may not be as happy when the light levels fall.

Sue uses the 18-250mm and gets stunning results from it. I tried out the 18-270mm and wouldn't hesitate to use it if I had one. Of the two, the longer lens has to be marginally more useful.
Best regards, John
tyronet2000
Posted 09/11/2013 - 16:58 Link
Thanks John, that's very helpful. I usually use a tripod when ever possible so I sure that will help too. Will just have to see how the "lens fund" progresses on the run up to Christmas
Regards
Stan

PPG
vic cross
Posted 09/11/2013 - 17:05 - Helpful Comment Link
Hi Stan. Vic here. I've got an 18-250 which I got as a happy snapper for holidays when weight restrictions are a problem when flying. I've used it around the garden to good effect this year and will definitely be taking it on my hols. For its range I find it very good. Of course I'll take my 10-20 for the wide indoor shots but will leave the 50-500 at home as it is approx. 2Kg.
CHEERS Vic.
Born again biker with lots of Pentax bits. Every day I wake up is a good day. I'm so old I don't even buy green bananas.
Edited by vic cross: 09/11/2013 - 17:06
tyronet2000
Posted 09/11/2013 - 17:23 Link
Thanks Vic. I have the 150-500mm and it's a lot of weight to lug about especially as it didn't even come out the bag on a couple of trips Sod's Law on one trip I'd left it at home and could have done with it I'm thinking along the lines of 18-250 or 18-270 and 10-24mm Tammy (which I already have). More room in the bag for sandwiches then
Regards
Stan

PPG
geordie01
Posted 13/11/2013 - 12:24 - Helpful Comment Link
Hi Stan you are more than welcome to give my Tamron 18-250 a go if you want to see how you get on with it as it is the same as the pentax one.
Edited by geordie01: 13/11/2013 - 12:26
bforbes
Posted 13/11/2013 - 12:49 - Helpful Comment Link
Hi Stan. I went for the Pentax 18-250 on a recent weight restricted trip to Poland.
All with the 18-250
link
tyronet2000
Posted 13/11/2013 - 18:59 Link
That's very kind of you Geordie, will have to try and arrange a meet. I was in Jessops today and was amazed at how small in size the 18-270mm was, Liz was amazed at how large the price was
Regards
Stan

PPG
tyronet2000
Posted 13/11/2013 - 19:07 Link
I hadn't realized that was the lens you used Barrie, I thought the images you posted were well taken. My main reason for "weight reduction" is the club outings. I've sort of decided, unless I know before hand , to just take the 18-135mm, the 10-24mm and/or the 55-300mm. Of course that would mean changing lenses and that's always a risk
Regards
Stan

PPG
bforbes
Posted 13/11/2013 - 19:09 Link
You have a PM
geordie01
Posted 13/11/2013 - 22:45 - Helpful Comment Link
Not a problem Stan if you want I will drop it off and you can try it out for a few days to see if it is what you need.
tyronet2000
Posted 13/11/2013 - 23:11 Link
geordie01 wrote:
Not a problem Stan if you want I will drop it off and you can try it out for a few days to see if it is what you need.
You have a PM
Regards
Stan

PPG
tyronet2000
Posted 25/04/2017 - 09:40 Link
Just had a notification of a reply to this at 00:28 today. Nothing to see so must be a glich in the system or someone decided not to post
.
Regards
Stan

PPG
Edited by tyronet2000: 25/04/2017 - 09:42
JAK
Posted 25/04/2017 - 13:02 Link
Having re-read the old thread (it wasn't me earlier by the way) I was wondering what the outcome was. Did you go for the 18-250? It seems the thread died a death before a conclusion was reached.
John K
Edited by JAK: 25/04/2017 - 13:03
Posted 25/04/2017 - 15:15 - Helpful Comment Link
tyronet2000 wrote:
Just had a notification of a reply to this at 00:28 today. Nothing to see so must be a glich in the system or someone decided not to post
.
Yes, I posted but was not certain of the issue I raised, so removed it ☺

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo