OMG ...
Posted 19/02/2010 - 16:09
Link
thoughton wrote:
While we're on the subject of gargantuan lenses, in that PF thread there is a link to a Carl Zeiss 1700mm f/4. You have to check this thing out, it weighs 256kg and looks like something out of Star Wars.
I'll wait for the f2.8 version.
While we're on the subject of gargantuan lenses, in that PF thread there is a link to a Carl Zeiss 1700mm f/4. You have to check this thing out, it weighs 256kg and looks like something out of Star Wars.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Posted 20/02/2010 - 04:21
Link
royd63uk wrote:
Quote:
I wonder what the reaction would be if you were doing some photography in front of a Federal building in the US with that bad boy?!
Guantanamo BayI wonder what the reaction would be if you were doing some photography in front of a Federal building in the US with that bad boy?!
To Mr John Riley - would you consider supplying the denizens here with a ROFL smiley perhaps? There seems to be a market...
Posted 20/02/2010 - 08:41
Link
royd63uk wrote:
You don't even need to be in the US. Try using that lens here in the UK. You'll be arrested for being either a pedo or a terrorist.
Quote:
I wonder what the reaction would be if you were doing some photography in front of a Federal building in the US with that bad boy?!
Guantanamo BayI wonder what the reaction would be if you were doing some photography in front of a Federal building in the US with that bad boy?!
PhilipGoh.com - Wedding and Portrait Photographer
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
7650 posts
21 years
Totana,
Spain.
Moon shot with this lens. I want one
"That's right dear, I want to spend almost £10000.00 to take a nice picture of the moon".