Not bad for a cheapo lens?
Posted 03/01/2011 - 18:41
Link
That 2nd shot in particular is impressive Dave. Body frozen but props still showing motion is exactly how it should be. And no visible signs of the PF the 70-300 is famous for (it's still a very sharp lense though - mine is downstairs in the cupboard) !
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Posted 03/01/2011 - 22:20
Link
I never have problems with my Tammt 70-300, I find it sharp almost to full zoom.
For the money it's a cracking lens.
Nice shots by the way.
For the money it's a cracking lens.
Nice shots by the way.
Cheers, HG
K110+DA40, K200+DA35, K3 and a bag of lenses, bodies and other bits.
Mustn't forget the Zenits, or folders, or...
PPG entries.
K110+DA40, K200+DA35, K3 and a bag of lenses, bodies and other bits.
Mustn't forget the Zenits, or folders, or...
PPG entries.
Posted 05/01/2011 - 12:31
Link
Quote:
Those Tamron's appear to be an underrated lens
Think most users here would rate it highly. It certainly gives most bang for the buck, one of my most used lenses when I started out.Those Tamron's appear to be an underrated lens
Davex.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
1109 posts
17 years
Cambridge
Dave
[IMG]http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa343/Blincodave/IMGP1635.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa343/Blincodave/IMGP1633.jpg[/IMG]