Multifaceted Glass
Posted 07/04/2009 - 13:57
Link
Fantastic!
Posted 07/04/2009 - 13:58
Link
Amazing piece of architecture! And a great capture too
Matt
Matt
http://www.mattmatic.co.uk
(For gallery, tips and links)
(For gallery, tips and links)
Posted 07/04/2009 - 14:07
Link
This is excellent, I love pictures like this,
david
david
Posted 07/04/2009 - 14:11
Link
Thanks everyone, appreciate it.
Aiki, I didn't know there was one.
Aiki, I didn't know there was one.
"All the technique in the world doesn’t compensate for the inability to notice." - Elliott Erwitt
http://paulyrichard.wordpress.com/
http://paulyrichard.wordpress.com/
Posted 07/04/2009 - 14:15
Link
paulyrichard wrote:
Thanks everyone, appreciate it.
Aiki, I didn't know there was one.
Oh, no !Thanks everyone, appreciate it.
Aiki, I didn't know there was one.
Its a good pic to partcipate.
I do not know the rules so exact...probably not allowed to delete from here and post there ??
Posted 07/04/2009 - 14:22
Link
Nice image. Love the colour and detail. Curious as to why the white band at the top has been left in, I'd have taken that out?
Best regards, John
Posted 07/04/2009 - 14:28
Link
Nothing written in the rules....
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/Fortnightly-Competition-Rules-8652
I guess it is your decision
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/Fortnightly-Competition-Rules-8652
I guess it is your decision
Posted 07/04/2009 - 14:42
Link
Thanks Aiki.
In the first shot I jus' wanted to give a definition of space. Here is another aspect, John.
[IMG]http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j159/paulyrichard/multifactetedglasscontrastmedium409.jpg[/IMG]
In the first shot I jus' wanted to give a definition of space. Here is another aspect, John.
[IMG]http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j159/paulyrichard/multifactetedglasscontrastmedium409.jpg[/IMG]
"All the technique in the world doesn’t compensate for the inability to notice." - Elliott Erwitt
http://paulyrichard.wordpress.com/
http://paulyrichard.wordpress.com/
Posted 07/04/2009 - 16:04
Link
Thanks for posting the alternative.
I think my preference might be for the colour saturation and composition of the first one, just without the white area. The second one is slightly weaker in terms of saturation and the more distant shot also seems to reduce the impact.
I think my preference might be for the colour saturation and composition of the first one, just without the white area. The second one is slightly weaker in terms of saturation and the more distant shot also seems to reduce the impact.
Best regards, John
Posted 07/04/2009 - 16:35
Link
johnriley wrote:
Thanks for posting the alternative.
I think my preference might be for the colour saturation and composition of the first one, just without the white area. The second one is slightly weaker in terms of saturation and the more distant shot also seems to reduce the impact.
I'd have to concur with John here. The blues in the first shot are really deep. Plus I prefer the increased perspective in the first shot, it leads the eye following a crooked path upwards into the frame, lingering on individual freflections & then continuing onwards. the white band is a bit of an anti climax once there though it's much more pleasing when I crop it by scrolling my browser.
Thanks for posting the alternative.
I think my preference might be for the colour saturation and composition of the first one, just without the white area. The second one is slightly weaker in terms of saturation and the more distant shot also seems to reduce the impact.
Posted 07/04/2009 - 16:40
Link
Thanks.
What I could do is to get rid of that border round the photo, and then jus' 'clone' out the light bluish parts of the sky.
No need for a crop and any lost pixels!
What I could do is to get rid of that border round the photo, and then jus' 'clone' out the light bluish parts of the sky.
No need for a crop and any lost pixels!
"All the technique in the world doesn’t compensate for the inability to notice." - Elliott Erwitt
http://paulyrichard.wordpress.com/
http://paulyrichard.wordpress.com/
Posted 07/04/2009 - 19:29
Link
Like the first. One thing is saturation, deep blue ...(as it was said)
But what I like about the first is the way the building reflects. (your angle of view)
the reflections are as if creating new windows into the building !
The second pic only proves that the first is good not just thanks to good architecture.(=not every pic taken of good architecture is good) Result also depends on how you take the pic. Fist- excellent. Second- has no efect.
I wonder if anyone understands at all, what I ment
But what I like about the first is the way the building reflects. (your angle of view)
the reflections are as if creating new windows into the building !
The second pic only proves that the first is good not just thanks to good architecture.(=not every pic taken of good architecture is good) Result also depends on how you take the pic. Fist- excellent. Second- has no efect.
I wonder if anyone understands at all, what I ment
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1307 posts
17 years
W. Yorkshire,
UK
London always has somethin' unique to photograph. I cannot wait for the buildings that are currently bein' built in Central London and what they may offer the photographer. It looks a mess at the moment with cranes all along London's skyline, I hope its worth it.
http://paulyrichard.wordpress.com/