More Tucuman mountains

dirk1000
Posted 25/10/2009 - 22:07 Link
A new set of photos of the Tucumán (AR) mountains. Taken the past weekend flying over the Valles Calchaquíes (NW of Argentina). No UV or PL lens filter used (sorry for some windshield glares). C&C are welcome.


[IMG]http://i572.photobucket.com/albums/ss168/dirk1000_2009/_IGP75895x1200.jpg[/IMG]
Museum of Indian civilization (Diaguita culture).


[IMG]http://i572.photobucket.com/albums/ss168/dirk1000_2009/_IGP76175x1200.jpg[/IMG]
Especially for geologists.


[IMG]http://i572.photobucket.com/albums/ss168/dirk1000_2009/_IGP76275x1200.jpg[/IMG]
An incredible sight of the desert, showing the strong winds erosion effect.


[IMG]http://i572.photobucket.com/albums/ss168/dirk1000_2009/_IGP76416x1200.jpg[/IMG]
Early in the morning. The residuary testimony of a windy day.


[IMG]http://i572.photobucket.com/albums/ss168/dirk1000_2009/_IGP76425x1200.jpg[/IMG]
Punta Balasto, province of Catamarca (AR). The lenticular-cirrus clouds indicating the presence of the Jet Stream wind (80 to 120 Kt).


[IMG]http://i572.photobucket.com/albums/ss168/dirk1000_2009/_IGP76475x1200.jpg[/IMG]
The desert and a geodesy devilry.


Best regards.
________________
Dirk TROTTEYN.
K10D+ Sigma 18-50 1:2.8 DC; DA 10-17 fish-eye.
matwhittington
Posted 25/10/2009 - 22:12 Link
Wow - really stunning pictures! I especially like the third one. Amazing

Regards

Mat
Mat W

My Flickr: link
jackitec
Posted 25/10/2009 - 22:12 Link
Excellent shots, no. 3 for me,
davex
Posted 25/10/2009 - 22:31 Link
4 for me, but they all lack a sence of scale,
K5 + 8mm-500mm zooms and primes
Please feel free to play with any images I post.
My flickr: link
pschlute
Posted 25/10/2009 - 23:20 Link
Great images Dirk. Nice to see you posting again.
Lance B
Posted 25/10/2009 - 23:47 Link
Lovely images. Number 3 is the best.
Cameras:K-7/K20D/*ist D/K10D
Lenses:DA14 f2.8, A16 f2.8, FA20 f2.8, FA31 f1.8, DA35 f2.8 macro, FA43 f1.9, FA50 f1.4, A50 f1.4, A50 f1.2, FA50 f2.8 macro, DA*55 f1.4, FA77 f1.8, DFA100 f2.8 macro, A100 f2.8, DA*300 f4, FA*300 f4.5, DA10-17 FE, DA12-24 f4, DA*16-50 f2.8, DA17-70 f4, FA*28-70 f2.8, DA*50-135 f2.8, DA*60-250 f4, FA*80-200 f2.8.
Flashes:AF540FGZ, AF360FGZ
Dr. Mhuni
Posted 26/10/2009 - 05:03 Link
Nice shots - I like 1 & 3 best. Though are they a tad oversharpened?
Mhuni

500px
ChrisA
Posted 26/10/2009 - 08:47 Link
Anyone that's taken pictures through a light aircraft canopy while doing the flying too will know how difficult it can sometimes be to get the composition just the way you want it, while avoiding canopy reflections as well. Quite apart from trying not to let the camera smack you in the face if the air is rough.

These are really terrific, Dirk, great to see some more of your pictures. I wish we had visibility like that in the South of England.

Any canopy reflections are really very minor - you've done a great job controlling them.

I don't think they're oversharpened either - they look a lot better at full size rather than after the forum software has done its resizing. And at full size, they're even more striking.

I'd be interested to know what heights (and altitudes) you were at for the different shots.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
paulyrichard
Posted 26/10/2009 - 13:07 Link
Great and wonderful images, I expect these have been given the HDR treatment, no?

The patterns are really amazin', I can look at these all day long, I see so much. Nice one.
"All the technique in the world doesn’t compensate for the inability to notice." - Elliott Erwitt

http://paulyrichard.wordpress.com/
Steve O
Posted 26/10/2009 - 17:59 Link
Amazing photos Dirk. My favourites are numbers 3 and 4.
It's lovely to see some more of your photos again.
Steve
-----
Keep your words soft and nice in case you have to eat them.
dirk1000
Posted 26/10/2009 - 22:34 Link
Thanks, everyone. Happy to see us again!

ChrisA wrote:
I'd be interested to know what heights (and altitudes) you were at for the different shots.
Altitude for majority of the photos was 10,000 ft ASL. Terrain elevation of the Valley is around 7,000 ft, more or less. (3,000 ft. AGL).

paulyrichard wrote:
I expect these have been given the HDR treatment, no?
No HDR treatment.

Best regards.
Dirk Trotteyn.-
thoughton
Posted 27/10/2009 - 10:45 Link
3 is like something out of National Geographic. Fantastic!
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
bforbes
Posted 27/10/2009 - 11:11 Link
3 for me is very striking. The perspective makes it look as if your on the ground.
Prieni
Posted 27/10/2009 - 11:59 Link
Fantastic shots, Dirk, just wonderful!

Prieni
How inappropriate to call this planet earth when it is quite clearly Ocean. - Arthur C. Clarke
Prieni's PPG page
womble
Posted 27/10/2009 - 15:06 Link
I'm going to be the odd one out and say I love the first one, but the third comes in a close second. No. 2 is less interesting as a photo but fascinating from a geological point of view.

Great stuff.

K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo