Mist Trees
Posted 31/12/2010 - 11:50
Link
The colour version of 1 gives greater depth and detail - like the buzzard just entering the mist band.
The B&W version of 2 seems much more atmospheric.
Nice set.
Pete
The B&W version of 2 seems much more atmospheric.
Nice set.
Pete
K5, K200d (IR @ 720NM), X-5
Posted 31/12/2010 - 11:59
Link
cardiff_gareth wrote:
The last 2 look the same, have you posted 2 colours shots?
Hi Gareth - They do look virtually identical but I promise the first is colour - I cropped them very slightly differently so I could tell them apart (and in my online Picasa album the first one looks much greener at the front than it does here for some reason)
The last 2 look the same, have you posted 2 colours shots?
No matter how many lenses I have owned - I have always needed just one more
Posted 31/12/2010 - 12:33
Link
Hmm the 2nd version of the 3rd shot definitely isn't in BW, although te colours are duller than the 1st version of the 3rd shot. On my screen it looks to be various shades of purple, blue, and a hint of green in the grass.
BW version of numnber 2 for me
BW version of numnber 2 for me
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 31/12/2010 - 12:45
Link
I'd consider split-toning no.1 - keep the touch of colour in the sky, but lose the green in the grass.
What thoughton said about the last shot (3). In fact, if I import it into Lightroom, its got massive amounts of colour information. If you'll excuse my poor effort... this is with a very quick B&W conversion, a bit of level tweaking, and a 0.7 grad filter... obviously you could do a lot better by working on the original, this is just for comparision!

What thoughton said about the last shot (3). In fact, if I import it into Lightroom, its got massive amounts of colour information. If you'll excuse my poor effort... this is with a very quick B&W conversion, a bit of level tweaking, and a 0.7 grad filter... obviously you could do a lot better by working on the original, this is just for comparision!

Still shooting in the dark (literally and metaphorically)...
Posted 31/12/2010 - 14:22
Link
Hi Tim and Richard
Apologies - I have made an error
Not sure how i did it Tim but you are quite right - that b+w of No 3 is colour - a different colour version that I did not even know I had
here is the b+w I meant to load

Richard - the only difference i can see between your version and mine is mine is a tad darker I think
My NY resoloution sb to learn how to use lightroom - have not got a clue how to use grad filters in lightroom and as for splt toning - would not know where to begin
Apologies - I have made an error
Not sure how i did it Tim but you are quite right - that b+w of No 3 is colour - a different colour version that I did not even know I had
here is the b+w I meant to load

Richard - the only difference i can see between your version and mine is mine is a tad darker I think
My NY resoloution sb to learn how to use lightroom - have not got a clue how to use grad filters in lightroom and as for splt toning - would not know where to begin
No matter how many lenses I have owned - I have always needed just one more
Posted 03/01/2011 - 09:40
Link
fritzthedog wrote:
Hi again...
Richard - the only difference i can see between your version and mine is mine is a tad darker I think
Compare the relative brightness of the sky in the top-left and the mist around the base of the right-hand tree on the two pictures. On your version, the sky is burnt-out and the tree is a sillouette - by comparison to mine where both are much softer and closer in range. Of course this is purely to taste...Hi again...
Richard - the only difference i can see between your version and mine is mine is a tad darker I think
fritzthedog wrote:
My NY resoloution sb to learn how to use lightroom - have not got a clue how to use grad filters in lightroom and as for splt toning - would not know where to begin
Neither did I until I started to use specific features of Lightroom - but there's a huge number excellent Lightroom tutorials on the web, so everytime I get stuck with "how do I use xxx" I just google a few until I find one that's simple enough for me to understand!
My NY resoloution sb to learn how to use lightroom - have not got a clue how to use grad filters in lightroom and as for splt toning - would not know where to begin
Still shooting in the dark (literally and metaphorically)...
Posted 03/01/2011 - 09:56
Link
The versions with the bird are eye-catching Carl - a surreal background for it.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1908 posts
16 years
Knaresborough,
North Yorks
I can never decide whether this sort of shot looks better in colour or B+W especially when colour can look so close to b+w (shot 3) so have posted both versions of 3 shots.
All comments welcome
K20D + Pentax 55-300
regards
Carl
1- Colour
1- B+W
2 Colour
2 B+W
3 Colour
3 B+W