Mediaeval Portraits, DA*50-135
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
The only downside for me is its bulkiness and this has so far put me off buying one - I use my Sigma F2.8 105 macro for portraits / wedding stuff as it seems to give a very similar IQ and bokeh to the Pentax DA*50-135, but obviously doesn't have the convenience or silent operation of the zoom.
I like these shots; the backgrounds are sufficiently diffused to not be distracting, but detailed enough to see what they are and they add to the atmosphere. I actually think the dreary weather and soft light has helped as there are no nasty shadows and the colours are vibrant but not oversaturated.
Regards
David
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
Unlike the 50-135 masters, Messrs Trout and Cabstar, I have never really got to grips with this lens and have decided on more than one occasion to sell it, almost. There was a mediaeval festival in town yesterday so I decided to pop along and see if I could collar a few performers for portraits. The weather was grey and drizzly so the DA*50-135 was the obvious choice. I arrived to find my batteries flat so I had to charge one up for an hour or so during which the weather progressively worsened. But I managed to find some willing volunteers. Normally I chat to my subjects while I'm shooting to try and provoke some more interesting responses. Not so easy to do in French but I managed to get some of the things I wanted. I was a bit lazy, I should have set up the tripod but time was running out, space was a bit limited and the weather closing in horribly so I had to be quick. Some of the shots I was happy with but what could have been a very good shot indeed I messed up and it lacks sharpness and detail (note to self, use the ******* tripod). But I'm going to track down the fellow and see if I can do a shoot with him. But the upshot is that it has convinced me to definitely keep the lens. Aside from the obvious stellar quality the WR meant it was the only lens that was perfect for the job on this occasion. There was some discussion recently of the 50-135 as a portrait lens and I think these images give some idea of its potential:








Others here.
Pentax K1, K3, c/w 18-55 WR Kit Lens , 35mm DA , 100mm macro, 50-135 F2.8 DA*, 16-50 F2.8 DA*, 300mm F4 DA* Sigma 24mm F 2.8 super wide II, 15mm F4 Limited, Z 50P c/w 24mm & 35- 70mm 50mm F 1.4 A series, Lumix Compact
As David says,
the dull weather was just what you needed to produce these lovely muted colours, bright sunlight would have produced squinted eyes and garish colours.
Great characters captured too
ps: I'm sure it's a great lens but the photographer deserves credit
Michael
Second one reminds me of Rick Wakeman
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
There is something special about the way it renders colours, as you have demonstrated.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


2628 posts
16 years
Brighton,
England
Others here.