Manual Focus Lenses...
Posted 25/11/2010 - 19:46
Link
That's sad news to hear.
I liked the quality of the optics.
I really hope that Pentax will make more limiteds or similar like the DFA 100 WR lens.
Do you think that pentax can make a 135mm limited f/2.8 or f/3.5 pancake-ish lens?
Would be great if they can make it almost as large as the FA 77.
I doubt it will ever happen though.
I liked the quality of the optics.
I really hope that Pentax will make more limiteds or similar like the DFA 100 WR lens.
Do you think that pentax can make a 135mm limited f/2.8 or f/3.5 pancake-ish lens?
Would be great if they can make it almost as large as the FA 77.
I doubt it will ever happen though.
Posted 25/11/2010 - 20:08
Link
I'll settle for a 135mm f2.8 as good as the new 35mm f2.4 for about the £200 mark personally, there are plenty of expensive lenses out there already for those who can afford them!
Matt
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Posted 25/11/2010 - 21:06
Link
Having handled a Nikon 135mm F2 D lens (and what a beautiful piece of kit it is too) I would LOVE Pentax to come out with a DA*135mm F2 too. It would be a lot bigger than my little 135mm F2.5 Takumar, but I can imagine it being a stunner.
However this is going off topic, to which I am sorry....
However this is going off topic, to which I am sorry....
Some Cameras
Posted 26/11/2010 - 11:02
Link
Stefan do you have any experience of the Voigtlander 90mm F3.5 APO Lanther SLII?
Looks like a cracking Lens and not too ridiculous on price...
Looks like a cracking Lens and not too ridiculous on price...
Cheers Jules...
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Posted 26/11/2010 - 12:39
Link
No i haven't because i already have a good macro around that range.
The 125mm is more interesting because it has a longer reach and is f/2.5 so that means shallower DOF and good bokeh.
The 125mm is more interesting because it has a longer reach and is f/2.5 so that means shallower DOF and good bokeh.
Posted 27/11/2010 - 00:00
Link
Anvh wrote:
http://www.mflenses.com/lens-review
You might find more feedback on the forum there.
Thanks Stephan
Smeggypants wrote:
Is their a website that explains all the different Carl Zeiss manifestations?
If you meant with manifestations lenses then the MFlens forum might be useful, they have some reviews up or ratings.Is their a website that explains all the different Carl Zeiss manifestations?
http://www.mflenses.com/lens-review
You might find more feedback on the forum there.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



1172 posts
17 years
UK