Love Pentax k30
Posted 25/09/2013 - 11:19
Link
mrfrosty wrote:
everyone makes their own judgment and choices..........that's life......
Dave..
Yes and everyone gets to squabble about those choices... that's the internet!
everyone makes their own judgment and choices..........that's life......
Dave..
[link=https://500px.com/will_brealey/[/link]
Posted 25/09/2013 - 12:46
Link
All those full-stops are driving me dotty.
Philip
Philip
Posted 25/09/2013 - 15:40
Link
Sorry......................................
Posted 25/09/2013 - 16:01
Link
Please - stop, stop, stop, stop, stop, stop, stop, stop, stop, stop
Philip
Philip
Posted 25/09/2013 - 16:16
Link
Okay !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dave.
Dave.
Posted 25/09/2013 - 20:45
Link
Pentaxophile wrote:
What really would be 'cynical' is if they crippled or limited their lower end models, as Canikon tend to do (smaller viewfinders, no weather sealing etc)...
You are clearly an inspiration to the corporate world m'friend
The_archaeologist wrote:
I personally find this sudden glut of models suspiciously tinged with corporate cynicism, particularly in view of the damned near pinhead separation of specs between each model!
The whole thing smacks of pure sales orientated strategy and thinking at the expense of Pentax's former characteristic niche philosophy quite frankly!
...So what can I say beyond enjoy the photographic ride you're quite possibly being taken on by the camera industry folks.
I don't agree at all... putting high end features into cheaper bodies does not feel like I'm being taken for a ride at all - quite the reverse! At the moment Pentax are on fire in the 'bang per buck' stakes, especially if you take a K30/K50 model.I personally find this sudden glut of models suspiciously tinged with corporate cynicism, particularly in view of the damned near pinhead separation of specs between each model!
The whole thing smacks of pure sales orientated strategy and thinking at the expense of Pentax's former characteristic niche philosophy quite frankly!
...So what can I say beyond enjoy the photographic ride you're quite possibly being taken on by the camera industry folks.
What really would be 'cynical' is if they crippled or limited their lower end models, as Canikon tend to do (smaller viewfinders, no weather sealing etc)...
Posted 25/09/2013 - 20:52
Link
johnriley wrote:
Whichever way you look at it, the value and quality of Pentax are spot on. That really should be enough, but it may be coloured by our world-view. The everyone does everything for selfish reasons logic is a bit bleak IMHO.
Sometimes people just want to be of good service, hoping that by being so the business will come their way. If it does and they do well, that doesn't need to change into something else in our minds, does it?
And thus we circumnavigate the issue with silky aplomb and appease all with but a handful of carefully crafted words.Whichever way you look at it, the value and quality of Pentax are spot on. That really should be enough, but it may be coloured by our world-view. The everyone does everything for selfish reasons logic is a bit bleak IMHO.
Sometimes people just want to be of good service, hoping that by being so the business will come their way. If it does and they do well, that doesn't need to change into something else in our minds, does it?
Have you ever thought of being Santa's apprentice JR?
Posted 25/09/2013 - 21:23
Link
Silky aplomb? Appease all? Carefully crafted? You credit me with too much forethought, I was just speaking what I felt.
Best regards, John
Posted 25/09/2013 - 22:13
Link
Looking at the start of this subject to the end ........{sorry for the full stops } makes me smile..
Lets conclude that we all have said enough?
dave.
Lets conclude that we all have said enough?
dave.
Posted 25/09/2013 - 22:16
Link
Some of the full stops were distorting the page, so I've removed that post.
Posted 25/09/2013 - 22:19
Link
I give up {no full stop ]
Dave
Dave
Posted 26/09/2013 - 21:35
Link
johnriley wrote:
Silky aplomb? Appease all? Carefully crafted? You credit me with too much forethought, I was just speaking what I felt.
Sorry J.R, my mistake. I didn't realise that you were instead a slick and well practiced schmoozer!
Silky aplomb? Appease all? Carefully crafted? You credit me with too much forethought, I was just speaking what I felt.
Posted 26/09/2013 - 23:39
Link
At least he's not a self satisfied, oleaginous miscreant!
[link=https://500px.com/will_brealey/[/link]
Posted 02/10/2013 - 20:32
Link
Pentaxophile wrote:
At least he's not a self satisfied, oleaginous miscreant!
Well, based upon the same light hearted jibe/banter then I guess oily and smarmy (amongst other variations upon a similar theme) could have been employed within my retort, but the use of the word miscreant certainly would have overstepped the mark by a considerable margin under such circumstances don't you think?
At least he's not a self satisfied, oleaginous miscreant!
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
64 posts
12 years
wednesbury
Dave..