Limited or not

geordie01
Posted 21/09/2011 - 15:24 Link
Thinking about a 35mm prime but cannot decide between the 35mm 2.4 dal or the 35mm da 2.8 limited macro any one got any advice regarding these two lens is it really worth the extra for the limited as the dal seems to get a good write up.
ta
geordie
Pentaxophile
Posted 21/09/2011 - 15:59 - Helpful Comment Link
Very hard decision. After reading this, I went for the f2.4mm. The smoother bokeh sealed the deal (the price helped too!)

But on playing with the macro version in the shop, I was impressed with the build quality. And macro is a handy bonus. Tough call.
johnriley
Posted 21/09/2011 - 16:00 - Helpful Comment Link
Both will be excellent, buy on a balance of cost aginst required features.

So, the f2.4 version, inexpensive but no QS focusing and no macro


Or, the Macro lens for more substantial construction, closer focusing and QS. It is marginally slower, but not significantly so.
Best regards, John
sorted78
Posted 21/09/2011 - 16:04 - Helpful Comment Link
It depends what you want plan to do with it - I have the DA35/2.8 ltd and am very happy with it.

I bought it as part of my 'travel' kit as it is very sharp, I like shooting landscapes at that focal length and the macro capability is useful.

However, shallow depth-of-field and bokeh aren't its strong point - personally I'd choose the DA35/2.4 if that's your cup of tea.
japers45
Posted 21/09/2011 - 16:10 - Helpful Comment Link
Justifiably you could own both in time!
johnriley
Posted 21/09/2011 - 16:15 - Helpful Comment Link
Actually, given the low cost of the f2.4 version, why not start with that. If you're happy, then the quest is over. If not, you can sell it on at minimal loss and go for the most expensive option.
Best regards, John
japers45
Posted 21/09/2011 - 16:37 - Helpful Comment Link
You may need a lens hood with the 35 / 2.4 though- colours can be a bit muted without it. I was a bit disappointed with it outside until I got a cheap hood on ebay- made the world of difference.
geordie01
Posted 21/09/2011 - 18:32 Link
johnriley wrote:
Actually, given the low cost of the f2.4 version, why not start with that. If you're happy, then the quest is over. If not, you can sell it on at minimal loss and go for the most expensive option.
Good thinking John i think that,s the way forward. I have not really had much experience with primes i have used mostly short zooms but when i check the images i have taken with the 18-55 the vast majority are at or about 35mm fl so will give it a go.
gartmore
Posted 22/09/2011 - 10:48 - Helpful Comment Link
It really is a fantstic lens.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
geordie01
Posted 22/09/2011 - 12:07 Link
Got one on its way now from srs so we shall see on monday
Blythman
Posted 22/09/2011 - 12:16 Link
geordie01 wrote:
Got one on its way now from srs so we shall see on monday
If you don't like it I'll give you a hundred quid for it on Tuesday
Alan


PPG
Flickr
SteveF
Posted 22/09/2011 - 13:23 Link
Blythman wrote:
geordie01 wrote:
Got one on its way now from srs so we shall see on monday
If you don't like it I'll give you a hundred quid for it on Tuesday
Don't accept Alan's offer, put it on eBay, you'll make a profit! See this thread https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/e-bay-lunacy---30577
Blythman
Posted 22/09/2011 - 13:26 Link
SteveF wrote:
Blythman wrote:
geordie01 wrote:
Got one on its way now from srs so we shall see on monday
If you don't like it I'll give you a hundred quid for it on Tuesday
Don't accept Alan's offer, put it on eBay, you'll make a profit! See this thread https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/e-bay-lunacy---30577
Ahh but - no postage. And the covenience of a cash transaction
Alan


PPG
Flickr

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo