Lens Thoughts

ChrisA
Posted 14/01/2012 - 17:34 Link
gartmore wrote:
35mm f1.0
Just out of interest, why?
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Tyr
Posted 15/01/2012 - 02:06 Link
ChrisA wrote:
gartmore wrote:
35mm f1.0
Just out of interest, why?
Because then you get the DoF of a 52mm F1.5ish.

I'd want at least an f/1.4 DA* prime in the 28-35mm range. f/1 is just asking for trouble at a great cost.
gartmore
Posted 15/01/2012 - 11:10 Link
Chris, I've seen a lot of pictures recently with the Zeiss 50mm f0.95 Noctilux on the Leica M9 and I've been really knocked out by them. This guy's work is really impressive http://www.ottoschulzephotographers.com/blog/destination-wedding-photographers/l...
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Edited by gartmore: 15/01/2012 - 11:19
Pentaxophile
Posted 15/01/2012 - 11:14 Link
Would it not be cheaper and easier just to buy a D700?

Or perhaps wait for the mooted K1
Edited by Pentaxophile: 15/01/2012 - 11:16
Gwyn
Posted 15/01/2012 - 11:19 Link
john941 wrote:
A teli-converter to fit the DA 60-250mm lens
Ditto. SDM of course.

A longer lens or two would be good, but I'd be unlikely to buy them tbh.

A few more DC lenses (like the 18-135 drive) would be good too.
Posted 15/01/2012 - 12:21 Link
For me

1. DA* 28mm F1.4 (fast, giving correct FOV as the eye on APS-C)
2. DA* 135mm F2
3. DA* 200-400mm F4
Some Cameras
kingfisher
Posted 15/01/2012 - 19:14 Link
DA 85/1.8 at the price comparable to Nikon/Canon 85/1.8

DA 135/2

DA 28/2
womble
Posted 15/01/2012 - 21:06 Link
I'll second the request for a T/S lens.

K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Frogfish
Posted 16/01/2012 - 04:06 Link
gartmore wrote:
Chris, I've seen a lot of pictures recently with the Zeiss 50mm f0.95 Noctilux on the Leica M9 and I've been really knocked out by them. This guy's work is really impressive http://www.ottoschulzephotographers.com/blog/destination-wedding-photographers/l...
Most people agree that the Noctilux f0.95 is soft wide open and that by the time it sharpens up you might as well have bought a 35/1.4.
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Edited by Frogfish: 16/01/2012 - 04:06
gartmore
Posted 16/01/2012 - 08:55 Link
I wouldn't have thought many let alone 'most' people have any experience of it. The pictures I have seen are quite remarkable.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
smegg79
Posted 16/01/2012 - 12:41 Link
Long 70-100mm Platic fantastic prime, and a 12-16mm of the same. If they would make me as happy as the 35mm cheapy does I'd be made up
Frogfish
Posted 16/01/2012 - 13:00 Link
gartmore wrote:
I wouldn't have thought many let alone 'most' people have any experience of it. The pictures I have seen are quite remarkable.
OK so let me correct that to users and reviews of the f0.95.

Remarkable it probably accurate, but it still doesn't mean it's worth the price when there's so much other Zeiss glass that is also remarkable .... without costing an insane amount.
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Edited by Frogfish: 16/01/2012 - 13:03
wadna
Posted 17/01/2012 - 02:41 Link
johnriley wrote:
1. 80-400mm zoom

To be honest, I have all the other lenses I need and the range is just fine for my requirements.

Although we could argue for various longer options, even if they were made the cost would be out of my range.
Is that f2.8 John? It won't be cheap.
Don
Posted 17/01/2012 - 04:44 Link
a wr 85 1.4 macro with built in LED lights around the barrel
a wr 200-400 zoom
a wr 600mm 5.6 reflex

also a revised wr 1.7 teleconverter
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
mecrox
Posted 17/01/2012 - 11:28 Link
Reworked, improved, WR, lens motors as needed: 12-24mm, 16-50mm, 17-70mm, 50-200mm, 55-300mm.
Cheap 'n' cheerful 50mm and 70mm-ish primes.
New DA 28mm.
NEW DA 135mm.
New DA 70-200mm f4.
Bury SDM with a stake through its heart.

Make a start on adding motors to every lens in the range. This what the market mostly wants these days, right or wrong, I would guess.

Now dream on ...
Edited by mecrox: 17/01/2012 - 11:30

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo