Lapwings
Posted 22/12/2010 - 21:45
Link
I like these.
As you mentioned they are not perfect but the composition is good and you are out there giving it a go
Have you tried noise reduction software such as Neat Image (free version) that's not perfect either but it can be very effective
Regards
Stu
p.s if only perfect shots were allowed here I would have no posts
As you mentioned they are not perfect but the composition is good and you are out there giving it a go
Have you tried noise reduction software such as Neat Image (free version) that's not perfect either but it can be very effective
Regards
Stu
p.s if only perfect shots were allowed here I would have no posts
Posted 22/12/2010 - 23:33
Link
Thanks, Gareth. I thought so too!
Stuey, thanks for the tip. Duly downloaded & applied to No.2
Further thoughts?
![Comment Image]()
[IMG]http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af340/rogerhlane/Lapwings021crop_filtered.jpg[/IMG]
Coker.
Stuey, thanks for the tip. Duly downloaded & applied to No.2
Further thoughts?
[IMG]http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af340/rogerhlane/Lapwings021crop_filtered.jpg[/IMG]
Coker.
The more I look, the more there is to see!
Posted 22/12/2010 - 23:58
Link
And No.3,
![Comment Image]()
[IMG]http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af340/rogerhlane/Lapwings020cropadj_filtered.jpg[/IMG]
And No.1,
![Comment Image]()
[IMG]http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af340/rogerhlane/Lapwings043crop_filtered.jpg[/IMG]
Coker.
[IMG]http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af340/rogerhlane/Lapwings020cropadj_filtered.jpg[/IMG]
And No.1,
[IMG]http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af340/rogerhlane/Lapwings043crop_filtered.jpg[/IMG]
Coker.
The more I look, the more there is to see!
Posted 23/12/2010 - 12:28
Link
The images here are about 40% of the original frames, which were all shot at ISO800.
Coker.
Coker.
The more I look, the more there is to see!
Posted 23/12/2010 - 13:20
Link
Sorry,Will. These wern't Jpegs straight from the camera, I'd PP'd them in PSE9. The originals were pretty gloomy straight from the camera.
(edit)
Just checked the exif again & the metering was set to "spot", so read off the snow, under-exposing the birds!
Coker.
(edit)
Just checked the exif again & the metering was set to "spot", so read off the snow, under-exposing the birds!
Coker.
The more I look, the more there is to see!
Posted 23/12/2010 - 13:57
Link
Well done on capturing these images.
From personal experience I know how hard it is and my results have never been much good. The NR filter seems to work very well, so well I've just downloaded it myself. Nice tip Stuey.
From personal experience I know how hard it is and my results have never been much good. The NR filter seems to work very well, so well I've just downloaded it myself. Nice tip Stuey.
Great simplicity is only won by an intense moment or by years of intelligent effort. T.S Eliot
Gear Not enough!!
PPG
Flickr
My not so new website
Gear Not enough!!
PPG
Flickr
My not so new website
Posted 23/12/2010 - 19:17
Link
Goodness Roger, what a difference that bit of software makes! I love peewits: they're supposed to be getting rarer due to changed farming practices.
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Posted 23/12/2010 - 20:00
Link
I've just downloaded Neat Image, then took a couple of ISO 1600 shots in our dimly lit living room (actually not bad straight from the camera, considering it's a setting I'd never use). The software (at default settings) made a huge difference and, after a bit of levels and sharpening, produced a very clean image.
Thanks, Stuey! Now the K10 is, indeed, the perfect tool as I can get it to perform reasonably well in low light, if needed!
I do like this Forum...
Sorry for butting into your thread, Roger.
Thanks, Stuey! Now the K10 is, indeed, the perfect tool as I can get it to perform reasonably well in low light, if needed!
I do like this Forum...
Sorry for butting into your thread, Roger.
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Posted 23/12/2010 - 21:57
Link
I think Neat Image is trememdous and just using the default settings can yield superb results, I regularly shot at ISO800 on the K10&20D for my bird photography, I could never understand how it could clean up noise from the background yet appear not to touch feather detail.
I've not used it as much with the K5 as I'm waiting for the K5 noise profile.
I have plugged the software quite often on here, perhaps we shpuld have sticky for links to interesting software.
EDIT: Ooops Sorry I should also have commented on the pics, not perfect but far better than most of my attempts at Lapwings.
I've not used it as much with the K5 as I'm waiting for the K5 noise profile.
I have plugged the software quite often on here, perhaps we shpuld have sticky for links to interesting software.
EDIT: Ooops Sorry I should also have commented on the pics, not perfect but far better than most of my attempts at Lapwings.
Posted 23/12/2010 - 22:00
Link
It seems like at last I may have helped a few people, that makes me happy
I was introduced to Neat Image a few years ago by a computer dude who had helped with the Neat Image R&D, he was subcontracting in the same place I work.
I find it best not to have to use it but whenever there is a high ISO or underexposure then it does the trick with some loss of detail and sharpness but nothing is perfect I suppose.
Glad to pass this info on
Cheers
Stu
I was introduced to Neat Image a few years ago by a computer dude who had helped with the Neat Image R&D, he was subcontracting in the same place I work.
I find it best not to have to use it but whenever there is a high ISO or underexposure then it does the trick with some loss of detail and sharpness but nothing is perfect I suppose.
Glad to pass this info on
Cheers
Stu
Posted 23/12/2010 - 23:06
Link
That's the beauty of threads on PU, Andrew!
Just follow where they go!
Roger.
Just follow where they go!
Roger.
The more I look, the more there is to see!
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1547 posts
16 years
Wiltshire
Although far from being technically perfect, I'm pretty pleased with these images, being the first attempts at in-flight bird photography on my part.
K7, 55-300 (at 300), manual focus, overcast skies.
[IMG]http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af340/rogerhlane/Lapwings043crop.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af340/rogerhlane/Lapwings021crop.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af340/rogerhlane/Lapwings020cropadj.jpg[/IMG]
C&C welcome.
Coker.