Landscape Lens recommendations?
Posted 21/12/2014 - 09:12
Link
As you can see, there are as many opinions as there are lenses.
I had a Sigma 10-20, but sold it as I didn't like the results I got when shooting landscape.
Maybe the best advice for you is to use what you have now, and decide if you need an ultra wide angle such as the Sigma, or maybe need just a better quality wide angle instead of the 18-135.
I had a Sigma 10-20, but sold it as I didn't like the results I got when shooting landscape.
Maybe the best advice for you is to use what you have now, and decide if you need an ultra wide angle such as the Sigma, or maybe need just a better quality wide angle instead of the 18-135.
Posted 21/12/2014 - 11:32
Link
jeallen01 wrote:
I'm sure that my copy was just a poor one as I've seen many great shots taken by others with this lens and many owners do sing it's praises - I have been tempted to get another copy but it did put me off.
jemx99 wrote:
I did have a Sigma 10-20 for a while but found the IQ poor - maybe it was just my copy.
I think it probably was a bad copy because most of us find ours to be pretty sharp - I use my early F4.5-5.6 version indoors, pretty much wide open, when going around big NT houses and find it works well there most of the time too.I did have a Sigma 10-20 for a while but found the IQ poor - maybe it was just my copy.
Posted 21/12/2014 - 11:37
Link
Thanks everyone for your feedback. I did have a sigma 10-20 back in the days when I was shooting with Canon gear . I'll probably stick with what I have at present and invest in replacing a couple of grad filters that have seen better days.
Cheers
Pete
Cheers
Pete
K3, K50
Only doin' it for fun
Only doin' it for fun
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
1930 posts
17 years
W.London
I did have a Sigma 10-20 for a while but found the IQ poor - maybe it was just my copy.